It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Our Entire Space Program Is A Hoax And A Massive Deception

page: 110
57
<< 107  108  109    111  112  113 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by geobro
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
 

strange when they tested the sample the dutch were given it turned out to be a piece of fossilized tree .does the moon have trees ? nasa has never explained


That rock was not part of the 135 moon rocks which were real, nice try.. next?

Mr Middendorf told how the rock came from the U.S. State Department, but couldn't recall the exact details.


There's your first clue Sherlock.
edit on 24 4 2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by geobro
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
 

strange when they tested the sample the dutch were given it turned out to be a piece of fossilized tree .does the moon have trees ? nasa has never explained


What sample? Cite?



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 08:03 PM
link   
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
 

given by 3 moon men to dutch pm .in museum in holland sent for testing after 30 years found to be a fossilized tree



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 08:19 PM
link   
reply to post by geobro
 

No.
Given by the US Ambassador to the Prime Minister who kept it in his private collection. After the PM's death it went to the museum. NASA was not involved at any time.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 6/9/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 08:23 PM
link   
reply to post by geobro
 


The sample in question was not given by the NASA astronauts, it was given by an American ambassador and was assumed to be a moon rock. There were no thousands of Dutch people that saw this rock, it was on display for the first time ever for a few hours before someone familiar with lunar samples took one look at it and without any kind of laboratory test knew it was a fake.

Case closed.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 08:36 PM
link   
reply to post by denver22
 





Case closed.

If only it were that simple but we know the disturbing, horribly frightening fact that it's most likely to be a highly probable possibility and therefore not beyond the realm of plausibility that there were trees on the Moon before the Moon was flown into its current location. This case remains open until blogula issues his ruling.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 09:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by denver22
 





Case closed.

If only it were that simple but we know the disturbing, horribly frightening fact that it's most likely to be a highly probable possibility and therefore not beyond the realm of plausibility that there were trees on the Moon before the Moon was flown into its current location. This case remains open until blogula issues his ruling.


Yeah because all we see is the moon going up and the moon going down and the sun going up and the sun going down, And the moon is a death star with acorns on it and old oak trees with blue birds whistleing dixie.
coz all we are told to believe is what the powers that be told us - ooh and me charlatan friends says so, therefor it is in the realms of possibility....According to blocular....

Is there anymore questions from any moon hoaxers here i can answer for you?
Anything at all to declare?
edit on 24 4 2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24 4 2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 09:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by blocula
 




Those who have been allowed to analyze and test those rocks receive their funds and their paychecks from the state and government

College students on the payroll huh?


NASA prepared thin sections of representative lunar rocks on rectangular 1 x 2-inch glass slides, with special safety frames, that are suitable for use in college and university courses in petrology and microscopic petrography for advanced geology students. Each set of 12 slides is accompanied by a sample disk (described above) and teaching materials. The typical loan period is two weeks.

How to Request Lunar Samples

No security clearance required blogula. Keep talking though, the more you say the better the odds that something you say will be correct.

Who prepared those slides? the college students themselves? or those who receive their funds and their paychecks from the state and government? and those slides,if the actually do contain real moon rocks? most likely contain "lunar Meteorites" that fell to earth naturally and were not physically brought back from the moon by anyone...
edit on 9-6-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 09:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by blocula
Who prepared those slides? the college students themselves? or those who receive their funds and their paychecks from the state and government? and those slides,if the actually do contain real moon rocks? most likely contain "lunar Meteorites" that fell to earth naturally and were not physically brought back from the moon by anyone...
edit on 9-6-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



You're absolutely ridiculous. Do you know how rare lunar meteorites are? Less than 1 in 1000 of all known meteorites come from the moon, and it's not like finding ANY meteorite is a simple task. You'd actually probably have a better chance at winning the lotto or being struck by lightning than you would finding a lunar meteorite, and there's about 900lbs of lunar sample collectively from all Apollo missions, and that's not even counting the Soviet samples. The first lunar meteorite found was Yamato 791197 in 1979, and it wasn't even confirmed to be of lunar origin until the discovery of ALHA 81005 in 1982. They were able to tell they were lunar meteorites BECAUSE of the lunar samples retrieved from the moon's surface by astronauts. How can they claim they are definitely lunar meteorites without known lunar properties to compare it to?

Just face it. Admit you are wrong and man has been to the moon. You keep digging yourself deeper and deeper into a hole with each new insanely ignorant theory you blab about.
edit on 6-9-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 09:53 PM
link   


Originally posted by blocula Who prepared those slides? the college students themselves? or those who receive their funds and their paychecks from the state and government? and those slides,if the actually do contain real moon rocks? most likely contain "lunar Meteorites" that fell to earth naturally and were not physically brought back from the moon by anyone...





Listen bloc

The textural and compositional variety spans, and in some ways exceeds, that of rocks collected on the six Apollo landing missions, so the meteorites must come from many locations. More importantly, it is possible to determine how long ago a rock left the Moon using cosmic-ray exposure ages. Small rocks on the surface of the Moon and in orbit around the Sun or Earth are exposed to cosmic rays. The cosmic rays are so energetic that they cause nuclear reactions in the meteoroids that change one nuclide (isotope) into another. Some of those nuclides produced are radioactive. As soon as they fall to Earth, production stops because the Earth's atmosphere absorbs nearly all cosmic rays. The radionuclides decay on Earth with no further production. The most well-know such isotope is 14C (carbon 14), which is produced from oxygen atoms in the meteoroid. Other important radionuclides produced by cosmic-ray exposure are 10Be, 26Al, 36Cl, and 41Ca. Because the various radionuclides all have different half-lives, it is often possible to tell how long a rock was exposed on or near the surface of the Moon, how long it took to travel to Earth, and how long ago it fell. For example, cosmic-ray exposure data for Kalahari 008/009 suggest that the meteorite left the Moon only a few hundred years ago. At the other extreme, Dhofar 025 took 13-20 million years to get here (Nishiizumi & Caffee, 2001). Because there is a wide range in the Earth-Moon transit times, we know that many impacts on the Moon were required to launch the lunar meteorites.


read .....................................................
edit on 24 4 2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:01 PM
link   
reply to post by blocula
 


Next question?



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by paradox

Originally posted by blocula
Who prepared those slides? the college students themselves? or those who receive their funds and their paychecks from the state and government? and those slides,if the actually do contain real moon rocks? most likely contain "lunar Meteorites" that fell to earth naturally and were not physically brought back from the moon by anyone...
edit on 9-6-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



Do you know how rare lunar meteorites are? Less than 1 in 1000 of all known meteorites come from the moon,
Says who? people paid to lie and warp the truth? people who receive their fundings and their paychecks from the state and government? and "if" they are that rare,so what? they still exist and easily could have been used as decoys,force fed to a gullible public as being real moon rocks,no doubt about it...
edit on 9-6-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:17 PM
link   
reply to post by blocula
 

R-E-A-D T-H-E -P-O-S-T-S



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by blocula

Originally posted by paradox

Originally posted by blocula
Who prepared those slides? the college students themselves? or those who receive their funds and their paychecks from the state and government? and those slides,if the actually do contain real moon rocks? most likely contain "lunar Meteorites" that fell to earth naturally and were not physically brought back from the moon by anyone...
edit on 9-6-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



Do you know how rare lunar meteorites are? Less than 1 in 1000 of all known meteorites come from the moon,
Says who? people paid to lie and warp the truth? people who receive their fundings and their paychecks from the state and government? and "if" they are that rare,so what? they still exist and easily could have been used as decoys,force fed to a gullible public as being real moon rocks,no doubt about it...
edit on 9-6-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



Yeah...they exist....and you need samples you KNOW are from the lunar surface to compare the properties to. Therefore since we know there are lunar meteorites, we also know there were lunar samples taken from the surface by the astronauts.

Next?



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:32 PM
link   
reply to post by denver22
 


thats not what the documentry on sky channel 200 was saying last night think the was the dude who prints nexus magazine



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:35 PM
link   
reply to post by geobro
 

He was wrong.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 
Lunar meteorites exist and earth bound rocks spray painted gold and silver exist,but moon rocks brought back to earth from the lunar surface by astronauts dont exist,imo...



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by geobro
reply to post by denver22
 


thats not what the documentry on sky channel 200 was saying last night think the was the dude who prints nexus magazine


You sure your not getting confused with the sci - fi channel?
Links ?



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:40 PM
link   
reply to post by blocula
 


Lunar meteorites exist

Ok. Good.
Now explain how we know they are lunar meteorites.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 10:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by paradox
 
Lunar meteorites exist and earth bound rocks spray painted gold and silver exist,but moon rocks brought back to earth from the lunar surface by astronauts dont exist,imo...



Bloc you obviously know nothing about what you are talking about do you...
edit on 24 4 2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
57
<< 107  108  109    111  112  113 >>

log in

join