It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by denver22
Isn't the earth too small in these images? If the earths diameter is 4 times larger than the moon, should'nt the earth appear 4 times larger when seen rising above the lunar horizon and when seen within the lunar sky, meaning 4 times larger than the size of the (quite large) full moon when seen from earth?
Faked Earthrise? www.davidicke.com...
Earthrise > en.wikipedia.org...
The Moon has approximately 1/4 Earth's diameter,1/50 Earth's volume and 1/80 Earth's mass > www.freemars.org...edit on 29-5-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by dragonridr
Earth and the moon are obviously the same distance apart and the earths diameter is four times larger (wider) than the moon and so whatever size the moon looks like when seen from the earths surface, the earth should look four times as large (wide) when seen from the moons surface and in the "earthrise" photos and films of nasa,it does not...Why?...Because they are faked,imo...
edit on 30-5-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by denver22
Isn't the earth too small in these images? If the earths diameter is 4 times larger than the moon, should'nt the earth appear 4 times larger when seen rising above the lunar horizon and when seen within the lunar sky, meaning 4 times larger than the size of the (quite large) full moon when seen from earth?
Faked Earthrise? www.davidicke.com...
Earthrise > en.wikipedia.org...
The Moon has approximately 1/4 Earth's diameter,1/50 Earth's volume and 1/80 Earth's mass > www.freemars.org...edit on 29-5-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
Because we are trying to see stars through the vision distorting atmosphere of earth,but on the moon, there is supposedly no atmosphere and so there should be many hundreds,perhaps thousands of clearly visible stars seen within the nasa films and photos and there are not and that,imo,is yet another in a long line of glaringly obvious moon mission hoaxes and deceptions...
Originally posted by Gibborium
Originally posted by blocula
The black sky should be full of stars, yet none are visible in any of the Apollo photographs.
This claim is one I hear frequently, and is one of the easiest to refute. The answer is very simple: they are too faint. Why are the stars too faint? We see multitudes of stars from earth and we have to view them through a vision obstructing,disruptive atmosphere and so when looking through the supposedly no atmosphere sky from the surface of the moon,the astronauts should have seen and the films and photos should have shown hundreds,perhaps thousands of vibrantly flickering and clearly visible stars and we dont...
I have a very simple experiment for you to conduct. Some morning around 8:00 am when the sky is clear of clouds, walk outside and look up and see if you can see the stars. What do you see? It will be difficult to see much of anything if you live where I do. And, you certainly will not be able to see the stars.
ven though they were trained, the “sight-and-shoot” method of course resulted in a lot of sub-optimal framing. This is apparent in the original, uncropped version of one of the most famous photos from the lunar landing (below). On other, more published versions of this photo, the horizon have been corrected and more black space added above Aldrin’s head
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by dragonridr
Earth and the moon are obviously the same distance apart and the earths diameter is four times larger (wider) than the moon and so whatever size the moon looks like when seen from the earths surface, the earth should look four times as large (wide) when seen from the moons surface and in the "earthrise" photos and films of nasa,it does not...Why?...Because they are faked,imo...
edit on 30-5-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
More lies and deceptions and delusions of grandeur that nasa and tptb spoon feed to the sheeple about outer space...edit on 30-5-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Those "japanese" photos of the earthrise are probably released "through" nasa
after nasa has thoroughly examined and altered them in their psych-ops photoshops...
Originally posted by captainpudding
Originally posted by blocula
More lies and deceptions and delusions of grandeur that nasa and tptb spoon feed to the sheeple about outer space...edit on 30-5-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
So not only have you previously claimed (without any proof I might add) that the global scientific community is federally funded but now you're claiming that Redbull is a division of NASA (again, with ZERO proof)? Am I the only one in this thread who feels like they're taking crazy pills?