It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by thedman
Is this one of those delusional "plane cant penetrate steel" nonsense.....?
Where is the evidence a plane can penetrate steel? If it was steel foil then yes, but massive 4" thick box columns?
But no, the OP was talking about the pentagon, if you missed that.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Oddly enough there's more pieces of the car left than there was of an airliner several hundred times the size of the car.
What's your point exactly?
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by thedman
Yawn.
We all know there was some debris thedman, we don't need reminding.
It doesn't change the PHYSICS of the impact.
Debris is not proof a Boeing hit the pentagon. Solve the problem with the physics, that has been pointed out, and you might be making a worthwhile contribution to the thread.
Originally posted by plube
Yes what was even more amazing is the guy driving the car lived....saw a documentary on it
Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by Alfie1
Wow, that's a boeing 757 hitting a wall equal to that of the pentagon! Awesome! You just convinced me!... Oh wait, what's that? It's not a 757? Oh and that is not a wall equal to that of the pentagon? What? In that video the plane does not make a hole? Oh... I see.
Also some other guy is showing images of plane parts etc! But you're saying that the plane would "atomize" (or rather the video you provided says that)... So which is it? Atomize or plane parts?
Now I'm even more confused!
My point was that no matter which way it went the engines would not disintegrate and would most definitely leave holes.
Debris is not proof a Boeing hit the pentagon. Solve the problem with the physics, that has been pointed out, and you might be making a worthwhile contribution to the thread.