It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So where is this false evidence? What is false about long term tracking of quakes and eruptions? What is false about whole sky surveys? What is false?
Originally posted by stereologist
I didn't make up these terms. I simply reported them. These terms come from or were derived from studies in folklore. That is what 2012 has become. It has become folklore.
Originally posted by stereologistI agree that no side is going to less prone to this. But do you know of any 2012 instances? It would be fascinating to learn about it if there were such a 2012 issue.
You have 3600 years of hard data available to you?!? Please source. For your argument "against" the 2012ers, you have maybe a century and a half of data? With really only the last 50 years being really recorded...and of that really only 10 years that is recording alot more places, which could make it "seem" like there is more happening in/to the Earth, but, maybe it really is. Like I said, you don't know, you are only using the data that you believe to be true. Didn't they believe the Earth to be flat awhile ago as well?
ETA: Iraq's WMD, Iran's nukes, 9/11 was Bin Laden, the glove didn't fit, etc.
You may be right, you may well be very, very wrong. Either way, things are neither ostensible nor are they folklore until after Dec 31, 2012.
Simple as that. You are as off-based as the ones you ridicule under your breath, the only difference is that you are predicting what will be folklore instead of [insert 2012 event(s)].
- OP makes a post saying X will happen.
- 2nd poster makes a post saying X can't possibly happen, giving no evidence or explanation why.
Sounds in the sky?
Take for example the basic claim that the Long Count ends on December 21, 2012. Not a single 2012 believer can provide an example of this being true or even where the claim originates. Now, this is in truth a false claim. Yet it is a false claim that has been absorbed into these people's beliefs and in fat drives the entire quasi-religion that is 2012. This is a clear cut example of ostension.
My point being ( do I really need to keep explaining it?) is that there is too little data right now for you to claim that the natural disasters are not increasing. (How old is the Earth compared to how long accurate records have been kept?) You might be providing false data without knowing it, much like the people who "knew" the Earth was flat.
Edit: The reason I said 3600 years of data was because of the supposed 3600 cycle of destruction. You referenced this number in a couple of posts above.
You may be right, you may well be very, very wrong. Either way, things are neither ostensible nor are they folklore until after Dec 31, 2012.
Simple as that. You are as off-based as the ones you ridicule under your breath, the only difference is that you are predicting what will be folklore instead of [insert 2012 event(s)].
Originally posted by stereologist That is not true. What we already know to be false are: [snipped events which can still come to pass or had nothing to do with 2012 related events]...
We don't need to wait any longer to know all of that is false. These are all folklore.
Spin it, lie about it, rotate the truth any way you want, the bottom line is nothing is known until after 2012. Ostensibility or predictions.
See above. I couldn't have made this any simpler for you. Why lie to continue a thread based on lies?
That is not true. What we already know to be false are:
1. An unknown mass in the solar system within the orbits of the known planets
2. A second sun
3. Mayan prophecies
4. Other cultures referring to 2012
5. Increases in quakes and volcanic eruptions
6. Increases in fireballs
7. Changes in DNA
8. Great planetary alignment
9. Giant spaceships next to the sun
10. Nibiru
11. Elenin impact
12. rocket launch failures are messages from outside of the Earth
13. 3600 year catastrophe cycle
Spin it, lie about it, rotate the truth any way you want, the bottom line is nothing is known until after 2012. Ostensibility or predictions.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by PulsusMeusGallo
Spin it, lie about it, rotate the truth any way you want, the bottom line is nothing is known until after 2012. Ostensibility or predictions.
Wrong. We know that the Maya and other ancient cultures said nothing regarding 2012. Claims to the contrary have become part of the 2012 canon and form the basis for most if not all 2012 predictions. That is a fact that is easily verifiable.
Which hasn't one thing to do with my post. Let me repeat it verbatim since you must have missed it above^
"Spin it, lie about it, rotate the truth any way you want, the bottom line is nothing is known until after 2012. Ostensibility or predictions."
With that, comment as you wish, I can't spell this out any plainer. I'm through.
Originally posted by superman2012
Ah yes, but can you provide proof it doesn't end in 2012? We don't know why they made their calendar to only last so long before it starts over. We can take an educated guess at it, but in the end, you can not say with 100% certainty that you know for sure.