The real Trayvon Martin...take a look....what MSM won't show you., page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 27-3-2012 @ 09:17 PM by timetothink
reply to post by USarmyFL



Exactly why I posted the pictures...all we see on the news is how bad Zimmerman when was and how small and innocent Trayvon was. neither of which have been proven.

That pic on the news of Trayvon was 5years old......

Guess what...people grow up from 12 to 17.....not always mentally but physically.

Trayvon grew up to be 6'3". About 170 to 200 lbs. Size matters.


Character matters.

Zimmermans supposed character is being thrown out all over the media....

Trayvons is relevant also.....and as I said in my title....we need to show what the mms won't.

It is the same thing the laywers will do...should it go to trial.

And all this race baiting and false portrayals are leading to group gang think and violence.


reply posted on 27-3-2012 @ 09:20 PM by timetothink
Examples of what the media portrayals are perpetrating.

Spike Lee sent out a tweet telling people to go to Zimmermans house and get him....he gave out the wrong address...that is negligent and harassment...if these people are hurt it is his fault.

Higgins, pictured at right, first began disseminating the Sanford address to his Twitter followers last Wednesday, including the claim that Zimmerman “Like the fat punk he is, he still lives at home with mommie & daddy.” In a simultaneous post to his Facebook wall, Higgins told his 4000 friends, “FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT & TOUCH HIM.” He also claimed in another post that, “REAL TALK MY PEOPLE OUT THERE IN FLORIDA JUST TOLD ME GEORGE ZIMMERMAN IS NOT AT HIS HOUSE THEY OUT THERE RIGHT NOW.” Higgins’s dissemination of Zimmerman’s purported Edgewater Circle address was not, however, limited to cyberspace. At a protest rally last Thursday in an L.A. park near his Crenshaw home, Higgins held a sign containing Zimmerman’s name, address, and phone number. Except, of course, none were accurate. The man who shot Martin is George Michael Zimmerman. Higgins has repeatedly identified him as “George W. Zimmerman.” The residence on Edgewater Circle is actually the home of David McClain, 72, and his wife Elaine, 70. The McClains, both of whom work for the Seminole County school system, have lived in the 1310-square-foot lakefront home for about a decade, records show. In an interview tonight, Elaine McClain told TSG that she and her husband were “afraid” due to the online linking of her address to Zimmerman. “We're keeping everything locked,” she said. McClain added that the couple was particularly unnerved by a letter mailed to them at their home. On the envelope, she said, were printed the words “Taste The Rainbow,” the slogan for Skittles. Martin was carrying a pack of Skittles and a can of ice tea when he was gunned down by Zimmerman. McClain said her husband returned the envelope unopened to the post office. The McClains only became aware that their address was being widely circulated online two days ago, when a TV reporter arrived at their home asking for “George.” Bewildered by their sudden--and erroneous--connection to Martin’s killer, the elderly couple’s distress can only be heightened by posts made by Twitter and Facebook users who threaten to visit their residence in search of Zimmerman. Or other posts that goad followers to vigilante action. Higgins has not responded to numerous TSG messages, so it is unknown where he came up with the information tying Zimmerman to the McClains's home. A check of Zimmerman’s residential history shows no connection to the Edgewater Circle property, which is about four miles from his actual home in Sanford. So how did Higgins screw things up? Besides overlooking the different middle initial, perhaps that answer is connected to an old voter record for a “William George Zimmerman” at the Edgewater Circle property. That registration, which dates back to 1995, is for a 41-year-old man. The Zimmerman who shot Martin is 28.




reply posted on 27-3-2012 @ 10:15 PM by timetothink
reply to post by rumor21



I know right...

I asked my daughter to try to translate, she has no clue either.

My husband is familiar with it, from working on the streets.


reply posted on 27-3-2012 @ 10:45 PM by rumor21
Originally posted by UncleGreenLeaf
reply to
post by timetothink



so wut the cop told the dude to stop following him. if he would have this would just be another drug possession case. so wut tatts that he couldnt see make T a bad guy woa better be careful...............smh


Huh?


reply posted on 27-3-2012 @ 10:49 PM by timetothink
reply to post by rumor21



Originally posted by UncleGreenLeaf
reply to post by timetothink


so wut the cop told the dude to stop following him. if he would have this would just be another drug possession case. so wut tatts that he couldnt see make T a bad guy woa better be careful...............smh




so what the cop told the dude to stop following him. If he would have this would be just another drug possession case. so what, tattoos that he couldn't see make Trayvon a bad guy? whoa better be careful....

That is my interpretation....

edit on 27-3-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-3-2012 @ 10:59 PM by rumor21
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to
post by rumor21



Originally posted by UncleGreenLeaf
reply to post by timetothink


so wut the cop told the dude to stop following him. if he would have this would just be another drug possession case. so wut tatts that he couldnt see make T a bad guy woa better be careful...............smh




so what the cop told the dude to stop following him. If he would have this would be just another drug possession case. so what, tattoos that he couldn't see make Trayvon a bad guy? whoa better be careful....

That is my interpretation....

edit on 27-3-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)


I might have to go back to school and learn this language, thanks for the translation.



reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 07:22 AM by Tallone
reply to post by WeirdFuture77


The way I see it.

The perpetrator is the one committing the crime, in this case the one who pulled the trigger. The victim is not the killer. But his family, his mum and dad, his siblings, his kids if he has any, are just as surely victims as is the dead kid, and his own family - and the closer they were to him the worse they are injured. The kid is dead, the living will go on being victims of this incredibly mindless action. So lets get that straight first up.

Secondly, set aside the racial aspect. Why? Because it hides what has really happened here under a cloud of twisted innuendo, myths, stereotyping and lets not forget plain old politics. All of it highly manipulative, so much so we forget a 17 year old kid in a car just got shot to death on his way home - and for what? Stealing from a corner store? The Brits used to ship kids off to the penal colonies for stealing a loaf of bread. Now we just allow self appointed sheriffs to shoot them. Maybe that is an efficient solution.

Thirdly, even if the kid did imitate gangster signatures like wear the tattoos, do the gestures with his little brothers and sisters in a private home, how many of us would let out kids get shot for doing that? A tattoo you wear for life, could be a big mistake, but people don't usually get shot for trying to look bad.

People need to remember Trayvon Martin was not just a 17 year old black kid who liked to cultivate cool badness, who might have smoked weed, who might have worn a tattoo, who might have been one of our kids, no, he was more than all of that. He was a human being. And what he needs now is justice be done. There is no way in the world a civilised society can allow others to serve death to our kids and simply be allowed to walk away without answering to the family and friends he also killed a part of on that day.


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 07:32 AM by Bullypulpit
reply to post by Tallone



On stating "answer to...family,friends" do you mean face to face with a bounty on his head?I don't think so


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 12:17 PM by Merci
reply to post by timetothink



They keep it up and we will see exactly for whom and why those empty facilities were built with the 200 million dollar Halliburton contract since 2002.

Those that are using emotions instead of facts to develop their opinions and rage and riot to cause further descension are no better then anyone else using Trayvon as bait to inflame racial passions and exploit his death to continue the racially division of this country.

His family should be outraged that he is being used to inflame more violence but instead they instigate as well as the president of this country instigates with his comments that play right along the agenda of Obama's buddy and mentor Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals.

Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”
Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”
Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself.
Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.


Just saying dont let your emotions rule your judgement not everything is as it seems.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags
The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags
New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags
Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags