It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Beezzer's Court Discussion thread

page: 2
8
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 03:33 PM
link   
reply to post by mamabeth
 


I don't want to be the foreman.
I just stated I will be on the jury or a back up if needed.




posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 04:20 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


I know that and she is welcomed aboard.
I was just letting the other ATS members know
that Mama is jury foreman.



posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 04:35 PM
link   
reply to post by mamabeth
 
Gotcha!
Tips hat.





posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 05:31 PM
link   
As I posted in your other thread, I'd be interested in being on your jury if you still have openings.

I think I qualify because I am reasonably open-minded about the situation and I don't come to the table with a for-or-against position for either side, really. No axe to grind.



posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 06:06 PM
link   
So is this going to be the thread where the prosecution will begin opening?



posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 06:12 PM
link   
I'm anxious to see what the prosecution presents and what the defence presents.
I'm sure it's going to be a tough trial.

Beezzer, you're the Judge and Mama...you're the Jury Foreman but lets not forget that I have the power.
If you don't believe me just click on the link in my signature.





posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 10:29 PM
link   
reply to post by silent thunder
 
Okay by me. Prosecution hasn't begun opening statements yet. Contact mamabeth as she is the jury foreman.



posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 10:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
So is this going to be the thread where the prosecution will begin opening?


No, we'll keep that i the other thread. This one was made to provide just general discussion. I want the relavent points to be kept in the original thread.

As to your questions made in the other thread, those issues should be kept secondary to the core issue of defining the actions that took place that caused the death of Martin.

We'll give the prosecution just a wee bit more time.



posted on Mar, 26 2012 @ 10:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dr Cosma
I'm anxious to see what the prosecution presents and what the defence presents.
I'm sure it's going to be a tough trial.

Beezzer, you're the Judge and Mama...you're the Jury Foreman but lets not forget that I have the power.
If you don't believe me just click on the link in my signature.




The court recognizes that you do have the power. Sustained.



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 09:31 AM
link   
So when do we anticipate getting this show on the road?

The suspense is killing me.



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 09:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by watchitburn
So when do we anticipate getting this show on the road?

The suspense is killing me.

Good question. If the prosecution doesn't hurry up, then I will pick the next volunteer!



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 02:48 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


A question; are we the Jury allowed to star the prosecutor or the defence posts?
I mean you wouldn't tell who's starring but are we allowed to?
Wana play this legit



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 03:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dr Cosma
reply to post by beezzer
 


A question; are we the Jury allowed to star the prosecutor or the defence posts?
I mean you wouldn't tell who's starring but are we allowed to?
Wana play this legit
Absolutely. There are no restrictions as to starring. Some jurors (in real life) may like what a prosecutor or defense council has to say.



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 03:12 PM
link   
Oohhh good question Dr.!
Yeah, we should probably know some ground rules, as the jury.
Like we probably shouldn't post in the actual thread right?
And if we have a question, should we ask you (Your Honor) here or U2U so the DA and PA don't see it? Or should they?

Just don't want a mistrial!!!



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 03:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by chiefsmom
Oohhh good question Dr.!
Yeah, we should probably know some ground rules, as the jury.
Like we probably shouldn't post in the actual thread right?
And if we have a question, should we ask you (Your Honor) here or U2U so the DA and PA don't see it? Or should they?

Just don't want a mistrial!!!


I would suggest that the jury refrain from discussion until the trial has reached it's conclusion provided by the defense and prosecution.

Aftrerwards, any deliberation can take place in this thread.

Just to keep it exciting, any final deliberation or votes cast, should be done by U2U to the foreman.

I'm making this up as I go. If there are any other suggestions that may be better. . . I'm all ears.

(bunny? ears?
)



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 03:23 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 




Absolutely. There are no restrictions as to starring. Some jurors (in real life) may like what a prosecutor or defense council has to say.


Oky doky

Good to know the ground rules that's all.



posted on Mar, 27 2012 @ 03:26 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


Thank you!

Mine are bigger! (ears)



posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 10:54 AM
link   
I'm glad the case is still active, it nearly took an unexpected turn with Abe quitting as the Prosecution, which he's in his right to do so. Better late than never they say.
Thank's Abe for contributing though to this interesting project


Niceone Dembow for taking over

I'm sure all who are involved appreciate it, I do anyway.



posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 12:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Dr Cosma
 


Yeah, I was a bit worried that it would end right there. It really is an interesting idea, so thank you all for doing this!
Great idea again, beezzer!

edit on 28-3-2012 by chiefsmom because: sp



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 07:20 AM
link   
Attention all jury members,please take the time to read
all the posts from the trial and get back to me.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join