It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Voters have rejected gay marriage in 31 states.
Where is the suport for gay marriage that the pro-gay pressure groups make so much noise about?
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Some people are just lazy and don't go out and vote on the issue. It's the haters that come out to vote against it.
Originally posted by MisticRebel
I hope you right wingers are happy now, running to a judge and paying him off worked to your advantage in California.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Voters have rejected gay marriage in 31 states.
Where is the suport for gay marriage that the pro-gay pressure groups make so much noise about?
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Some people are just lazy and don't go out and vote on the issue. It's the haters that come out to vote against it.
Yet 99% of the hate on this thread has been from pro-gay activists who agressively attack anyone who disagrees with them.
The simple truth is, gay marriage has lost the vote in all 31 states where the public have been given the opportunity to vote.
Suck it up.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Yet 99% of the hate on this thread has been from pro-gay activists who agressively attack anyone who disagrees with them.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Interracial marriages were also rejected in the majority of states, until a case reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The SC ruled that it was unconstitutional to ban interracial marriage, so all states were forced to allow it. Did America come to an end after that? Nope.
Originally posted by Annee
What actually happened in California - - was a full on scare tactic media blitz - - paid for by the Mormon church - - the week before the original Prop 8 vote.
Gay rights activists are campaigning to have the words ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ erased from the statute book as part of a bill to legalise same-sex marriage.
Pressure group Stonewall yesterday released a draft bill, intended as a ‘model’ for the Marriage Bill due later this year, calling for spouses to be known as ‘parties to a marriage’ to avoid confusion for homosexual couples.
Daily Mail
Originally posted by MisticRebel
I hope Newt's little new trophy wife leaves his racist, homophobic ways after she finds out he disowned his own sister for being a lesbian. I hope you right wingers are happy now, running to a judge and paying him off worked to your advantage in california. But come november Obama will STILL be president, newt just opened his racist remarking mouth about the trayvon case, couldn't help himself, this for sure WILL cost him the nomination. I noticed Mitt had the decency to not back newts racist remarks. To think this is what becomes of the soo called Land of the free, home of the brave...... it is NOT. Not when you have racist, homophobic WRONG wingers running to pay off judges so they can have their selfish, self centered, self absorbed, homophobic, treasonous way. It just goes to show WRONG wingers bow to the "church" who helped them rig prop 8. At least JP Morgan stood its ground and TERMINATED all the "vatican's" accounts they had.
Same-sex marriages are not a human right, European judges have ruled.
Their decision shreds the claim by ministers that gay marriage is a universal human right and that same-sex couples have a right to marry because their mutual commitment is just as strong as that of husbands and wives.
Daily Mail
Originally posted by MisticRebel
California Same - Sex Marriage Ruling Upheld[/url]
How is THAT for TRUTH!!!!!
Originally posted by MisticRebel
reply to post by ollncasino
YOU are a LIAR of the HIGHEST DEGREE I saw your linked article umm... you forgot to tell EVERYONEeveryone the date on it was 2009, I'm posting the correct article from 2011 from huffingtonpost.com California Same - Sex Marriage Ruling Upheld
How is THAT for TRUTH!!!!!
Originally posted by MisticRebel
YOU are a LIAR of the HIGHEST DEGREE I saw your linked article umm... you forgot to tell EVERYONEeveryone the date on it was 2009
Originally posted by MisticRebel
, I'm posting the correct article from 2011 from huffingtonpost.com California Same - Sex Marriage Ruling Upheld
A law to allow same-sex marriages will force Christians to conduct gay weddings in church, it was claimed yesterday.
An analysis of equality law by Church of England lawyers suggests assurances from David Cameron and his ministers that no church will be compelled to provide such ceremonies are worthless.
Daily Mail
Originally posted by Annee
I really have nothing more to say to you.
You and your kind are BULLIES.
There is nothing more to it.
A government report has revealed that more than half of Britons are against gay marriage, and two thirds are against gay couples adopting children
The research by the Office for National Statistics was based on sources including the annual British Social Attitudes survey and research by the EU's Eurobarometer research arm
www.divamag.co.uk...
Originally posted by MisticRebel
ollncasino, what date is your article you just added going to list?. I hope its not from 2009 or further back, cause I'm going to look at the date on all your articles from now on & double check each articles date.
My main objection is that there is no precedent; that marriage has always been, historically, between people of the opposite sex, and linked to procreation.
The fact that, after half a century of government interference, up to a quarter of children now grow up without a father makes it seem a strange time to meddle with the institution.
If the government really wanted to consult the people, why go through this sham of a consultation – why not just have a referendum?
The Telegraph