It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by spacedog1973
I dont have an avatar pertaining to this case.
Originally posted by andersensrm
Key words "for no good reason". THe reality of the situation is, you don't know that it was done without reason, none of us do, because we aren't privy to the information on the investigation into this matter.
Is it murder no matter what the situation is? If you kill someone, no matter what the situation is, its murder, and therefore you should be locked up in prison, is that what you are trying to say????
Originally posted by cdesigns
There is an EYE WITNESS that was very close to them when all happened, he SAW and HEARD everything He was not busy calling 911 or hidding inside his condo, he saw everything. And backs everything that Zimmerman said it happened. All the other witnesses HEARD and SAW half of what happened. I'm a big man and I have screamed out of fear like a girl before, Zimmerman was the one screaming on the 911 tape and the EYE witness confirms this.
edit on 28-3-2012 by cdesigns because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by spacedog1973
Funny because you replied to me.....rude much?
Originally posted by timetothink
I cannot believe the arrogance of some of you people...to think you should be privy to the investigation...if this ever goes to trial they can't have everything out in the public...that's how jurors get swayed.
Oh...silly me that's what Uncle Al and the left want...I keep forgetting..they don't want a fair trial the just want revenge.
Originally posted by yuppa
reply to post by spacedog1973
Glad to elaborate. Now having been beaten up before I know that A nose bleeds pretty good. So the police get there and see whats what ok? then they collect the bloody clothes for evidence and let mr Zimmerman go to his house which is close AFTER the paramedics clean him up and prolly use liquid stiches on his head to seal the cut on the back of his head,which somehow got cut open,and since there is concrete near must have hit his head against while being pummeled by the youth. Zimmerman in the police report was wearing a red shirt at the time. When he walks in the Police station its BLUE. Simple deduction leads me to beleive he HAD TO CHANGE clothes,because the clothes he had on were seized. SO many people are not observing the clothes change its pitiful.
edit on 29-3-2012 by yuppa because: sentence had no use so removed one.
Originally posted by spacedog1973
Originally posted by yuppa
reply to post by spacedog1973
edit on 29-3-2012 by yuppa because: sentence had no use so removed one.
I'm sorry you have been beaten up before. But this does not make you an expert on being beaten up. Or maybe it does if you have been beaten up extensively on numerous occasions? Have you?
Anyway, since you seem to have the paranormal eye and seem to have seen these events take place although you weren;t there, perhaps you can let us know what the verdict will be at his trial.
Originally posted by yuppa
. In the police report Zimmerman was wearing a RED SHIRT correct? Now go back to the Video. DO YOU SEE HIM IN A RED SHIRT? The shirt is BLUE! Which means he CHANGED CLOTHES! ITS A BLOODY MIRACLE! Either he is a majician or they let him change clothes. The Cops keep bloody clothes if they feel it could be evidence.
But one man's testimony could be key for the police.
"The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: 'help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911," he said.
Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by yuppa
He was not wearing a shirt. The witness claims he was wearing a sweat shirt. Look at what he is wearing. That can easily be mistaken for a sweatshirt. Also, I don't think that letting you go home, change, and take a shower is standard procedure for, what should have been at the time, an investigation into the death of a child.
Originally posted by popsmayhem
There is no reason to drag an innocent
man through that legal system..
Originally posted by libertytoall
What is wrong with the lunacy in this thread. IN FLORIDA it is perfectly legal when unable to flee an assailant to use deadly force even if the assailant is unarmed. Zimmerman was acting in self defense which can be corroborated by the police report, eye witness testimony, the 9/11 tapes, and forensic and medical examination. In other words Zimmerman COULD NOT MAKE THE STORY UP.. You can't bs forensic science.. Zimmerman had every right to defend himself and end this bullies life. How anyone can see this any differently is beyond comprehension..
Originally posted by jedi_hamster
why do you?
who says zimmerman attacked martin? you do? media do? new black panthers? martin's parents, because he was oh-so-innocent young gangsta, robbing jewelry and smoking weed?
stop trolling already, it's getting boring.
Originally posted by jedi_hamster
after loosing him, he was going back to his car. and guess what? martin attacked him. who's the psycho?