It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Zimmerman's account of what happened is not hearsay. Do you know what that word means?
Hearsay is information gathered by one person from another person concerning some event, condition, or thing of which the first person had no direct experience.
By a guy who already has lied about killing. So yeah there's that. Not unbiased source at all.
Also poop, I figured that you wouldn't rise up to provide the evidence as requested. Noone is denying that there was a fight. Martin had just as much a right to self defense as Zimmerman. So where is the evidence that Martin started it and btw a liars word does not count.
Originally posted by itsJUSTzo
STOP bsing about a 17 year olds character when he hasnt even been given the opportunity to change and learn from his mistakes.
You pathetic people act like when you were 17 you never made mistakes and you liars act like you still dont.
I stole...I did drugs...omg my pants were even low at times and yes I wore hoodies.
Look at me now, life kept moving forward and I continued to evolve and learn from my mistakes after the age of 17.
If Trayvon was 45 years old and was doing these things, then yes....you would have a point.
But to say a 17 year old made mistakes, did drugs...stole...
and because of that was a thug and his shooting by some phsyco who was literally stalking him was justifiable...that ...is....just...sad...
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Zimmerman's account of what happened is not hearsay. Do you know what that word means?
Hearsay is information gathered by one person from another person concerning some event, condition, or thing of which the first person had no direct experience.
By a guy who already has lied about killing. So yeah there's that. Not unbiased source at all.
Also poop, I figured that you wouldn't rise up to provide the evidence as requested. Noone is denying that there was a fight. Martin had just as much a right to self defense as Zimmerman. So where is the evidence that Martin started it and btw a liars word does not count.
Originally posted by libertytoall
What is wrong with the lunacy in this thread. IN FLORIDA it is perfectly legal when unable to flee an assailant to use deadly force even if the assailant is unarmed. Zimmerman was acting in self defense which can be corroborated by the police report, eye witness testimony, the 9/11 tapes, and forensic and medical examination. In other words Zimmerman COULD NOT MAKE THE STORY UP.. You can't bs forensic science.. Zimmerman had every right to defend himself and end this bullies life. How anyone can see this any differently is beyond comprehension..
Trayvon got into fights in school, was suspended 3 times, fought with a city bus driver, and had numerous past incidents of breaking and entering.. A lot of people here are saying they stole stuff when they were younger but did you ever take a crowbar and scout out a house to break into and steal jewelry etc?? That's on a whole other level of criminal mind. It's clear Trayvon was not a morally sound individual and that gives me every reason to say BS when the media tries to paint him as their alter boy of perfection..
It's sad when a teenager dies but this particular incident was just like taking out the trash..edit on 28-3-2012 by libertytoall because: (no reason given)
''
Originally posted by popsmayhem
arrested but never convictedZimmerman has never been convicted of a crime. Having no prior convictions does not imply he should/should not be arrested in this case.
If you was never charged, your not a criminal..
Being arrested does not mean your guilty.
Zimmerman has never been charged with a crime.
Treyvon has had problems since early on in school.
ticking time bomb waiting to go off.