It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NUH UHHHHHHHHHH!!! Mariah Carey Steps On Stage With Her PANTS TOO TIGHT . . . And Lets Just Say . . . Her STUFF Looked A Little LOOSE!!!
AWWW SH*T!!! NBA Superstar BLAKE GRIFFIN Is Photo'd IN BED . . . Waking Up After GAME WINNING PERFORANCE . . . And His GF Is ON TOP OF HIM!!!
OH MY!!! Reality Stars EVELYN LOZADA . . . And JIM JONES FIANCE CHRISSY Take SEXY Pics Together . . . Both Wearing LINGERIE . . . And FEELING EACH OTHER UP!!
Actress ROSARIO DAWSON Got Some NEW BREAST IMPLANTS . . . And They Look REAL FAKE . . . Like Two ORANGES Sitting On Her CHEST!!!
CUTE CHICK!!! Christina Milian Is Photo'd LEAVING THE GYM . . . And She's Got On SPANDEX!!!
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by conspiracy nut
Ok, I will type it again, nice and slow. Neither one's past matters, in a life or death spur of the moment confrontation. Neither one's past matters. Neither one's past matters.
You just suck up and spew anything that fits your preconceived notion of the evil racist vigilante Zimmerman, and act like you are making a valid point. The only thing that matters, is that Tray was on top of the man, beating him. Unless there is some witness or evidence that proves that Zimmerman attacked Tray first, it lines up with self defense. And that's called justifiable homocide. Self defense.
edit on Tue, 01 May 2012 17:14:09 -0500 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by solarjetman
I am not even really pro zimmerman, I am pro justice. I believe strongly in the natural right of self defense, and am a strong believer in our right to bear arms. If it were up to me, open carry would be legal everywhere, for everyone over 18, that hasn't been convicted of unlawful gun violence.
The other reason I got involved, I saw a guy being bullied by the MSM, plain and simple. I know how much that sucks, so I don't just let it go when I see it. I have lost like 15 facebook friends over it, I don't care. When I see some bull# hit my newsfeed, I call it out. Anyone that knows me enough to try and friend me should know that.
What does it say about our justice system, that some leftwing wingnuts can go on the idiotbox, and tell half truths and outright lies that riles up the gullible, and then make demands? Isn't that the very definition of terrorism right there? I thought the US didn't tolerate or cave to terrorists demands?
What about the flip side? If someone is being investigated, and people go on the idiotbox and riles up the masses to demand the case be dropped? Are they gonna cave to that too?
Kangaroo court indeed.
edit on Tue, 01 May 2012 08:26:58 -0500 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by solarjetman
Let me ask all of the pro-Zimmerman people this: are you guys really arguing that Zimmerman is CLEARLY innocent, or are you arguing that there simply isn't enough to prove that he is guilty? I have less of a problem with the latter-- time will tell on that-- but some of the more venomous posts I've seen here and elsewhere attacking Trayvon have led me to believe it's the former...
not Pro-Zimmerman but rather Pro Innocent until proven guilty by a court of Law. That means your judgement of poor little 12yr old Treyvon needs justice and big bad old Zimmerman should have known better than to get out of bed that day,
Zimmerman needs to go to the chair attitude that Zimmerman is guilty, the thoughts and expressions you incite through all your profiles, thats what I am arguing with you about, all the preconceived hatred generated by your side, all the lies all the media lies and scandal
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by conspiracy nut
First off there is no proof that is his.
Second, nothing there indicates he is racist. I think mexicans is more of a description there. He is complaining about a problem. Say a group of mexican guys are regularly inconveniencing you or even pulling knives on you, when you describe that does it make it racist if you say that they are mexican? Anyway he is hispanic himself haha!
You guys keep reaching into areas that are of no consequence. Maybe it comforts you and gives you SOMETHING to talk about because within the confines of the actual case and evidence you don't really have much to say.edit on 1-5-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by conspiracy nut
First off there is no proof that is his.
Second, nothing there indicates he is racist. I think mexicans is more of a description there. He is complaining about a problem. Say a group of mexican guys are regularly inconveniencing you or even pulling knives on you, when you describe that does it make it racist if you say that they are mexican? Anyway he is hispanic himself haha!
You guys keep reaching into areas that are of no consequence. Maybe it comforts you and gives you SOMETHING to talk about because within the confines of the actual case and evidence you don't really have much to say.edit on 1-5-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
just because he is half hispanic does not exonerate him from being racist, if he could generalize a group of people so easily as to say EVERY mexican """"" you start to see a pattern here. plus this isnt a court of law here. i could use other evidence that may or might not be admissible in court to help form my opinion. i have always stated these are just my opinions on the case, you and a couple others are acting like your zimmermans frickin lawyer and pulling every perry mason trick in the book to try and win the case! i am not a lawyer i am voicing my opinion.