It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
First Trayvon Martin wasn't armed, he would have attacked with his fists, which is justified according the the SAME FRIGGIN LAW you guys are trying to use to say that Zimmerman was justified. Hypocrites!
Second there is no real evidence that Zimmerman received a beating, in fact the PHYSICAL evidence implies otherwise.
(Reuters) - Neighbors of George Zimmerman say he had bandages on his nose and head the day after he shot dead Trayvon Martin, supporting statements by the neighborhood watch volunteer that he was beaten in a confrontation with the black Florida teenager.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
The idea that Zimmerman could have been successfully attacked by a kid smaller, lighter, and ten years younger than him is moronic.
The fact that zimmerman refused medical treatment after he claims he had his head bashed into the ground and made him fear for his life leads one to think he is a lying piece of #.
the fact that video of zimmerman less than an hour after this alleged beating shows no signs of any wounds or even scratches further brings into question his claims.
The fact the lead officer in the case didnt believe Zimmerman either, and wanted to arrest him, but was overruled by his superiors, is yet another piece of the puzzle pointing to not only zimmermans guilt, but the fact he lied about the nature of the altercation.
The fact that there is are rcorded phone conversation between martin and his girlfreind that contradicts zimmermans account of the incident is yet another piece of data pointing to him lying.
edit on 16-4-2012 by stanguilles7 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by stanguilles7
do we actually know that Martin wasnt 6'3" and 175 of lean strong mass, what would Zimmerman weigh in same conditioning as Martin Buck 35 maybe.... come on please use common sense
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by stanguilles7
do we actually know that Martin wasnt 6'3" and 175 of lean strong mass, what would Zimmerman weigh in same conditioning as Martin Buck 35 maybe.... come on please use common sense
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by stanguilles7
do we actually know that Martin wasnt 6'3" and 175 of lean strong mass, what would Zimmerman weigh in same conditioning as Martin Buck 35 maybe.... come on please use common sense
Originally posted by mhc_70
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
First Trayvon Martin wasn't armed, he would have attacked with his fists, which is justified according the the SAME FRIGGIN LAW you guys are trying to use to say that Zimmerman was justified. Hypocrites!
Second there is no real evidence that Zimmerman received a beating, in fact the PHYSICAL evidence implies otherwise.
You really should get your facts straight...
(Reuters) - Neighbors of George Zimmerman say he had bandages on his nose and head the day after he shot dead Trayvon Martin, supporting statements by the neighborhood watch volunteer that he was beaten in a confrontation with the black Florida teenager.
(Reuters) - Neighbors of George Zimmerman say he had bandages on his nose and head the day after he shot dead Trayvon Martin, supporting statements by the neighborhood watch volunteer that he was beaten in a confrontation with the black Florida teenager.
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by stanguilles7
do we actually know that Martin wasnt 6'3" and 175 of lean strong mass, what would Zimmerman weigh in same conditioning as Martin Buck 35 maybe.... come on please use common sense
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by TinkerHaus
so your hypothetical is dead on and everybody else is all wet?
come on man, show me the money!!!
Originally posted by LErickson
reply to post by popsmayhem
Yeah I am still waiting on some sources and some answers from you myself.
Got them yet? Otherwise you are just still rambling crap that I am not going to read.
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
You guys ALL refuse to answer the question.
What kind of man are you? If someone was chasing you through the neighborhood, then when you ran the ran after you, when they caught up with you what would you do? You gonna fight him (remember, you're doing nothing wrong, just getting some candy and a drink) or are you going to let this guy do as he pleases with you?
Do you stand up for yourself when you are threatened, or do you play possum? What kind of men are you?
Answer it or avoid it, I think avoiding it makes my point just the same as if you answered it.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
You guys ALL refuse to answer the question.
What kind of man are you? If someone was chasing you through the neighborhood, then when you ran the ran after you, when they caught up with you what would you do? You gonna fight him (remember, you're doing nothing wrong, just getting some candy and a drink) or are you going to let this guy do as he pleases with you?
Do you stand up for yourself when you are threatened, or do you play possum? What kind of men are you?
Answer it or avoid it, I think avoiding it makes my point just the same as if you answered it.
It is indeed contradictory. These guys are arguing that Zimmerman had a right to defend himself because they claim Martin attacked him. But, following their own logic, since Zimmerman followed Martin, that would mean martin had the RIGHT to attack Zimmerman. Right?
But their argument goes like this: Zimmerman had a right to kill Martin because Martin attacked him. And Zimmerman had a right to follow martin because he was protecting himself. But martin apparently didnt have the right to defend himself against Zimmerman following and attacking him because.....?
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
Are you just easily led or do you have an agenda that aligns with Zimmerman's actions?