It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
Can I say "SELECTIVENESS"?
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
The link goes to cnn you can click to get the pdf
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
The link goes to cnn you can click to get the pdf
What else would the prosecuter say?
That does not mean thats what happen...
Thats there offense
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
The link goes to cnn you can click to get the pdf
What else would the prosecuter say?
That does not mean thats what happen...
Thats there offense
Did you read it? It's not the prosecutors words, its the words of the investigtors as to why they brought charges.
So if you admit this report means nothing, I guess you will admit the original police report that claims bloody nose and head and yelling for help also means nothing.....right? I mean you can't have it all ways.
edit on 12-4-2012 by pizzanazi75 because: (no reason given)
I edited this earlier and pasted something not directed at you pops, if you read it, sorry. I don't know how it happened, but i removed it because it was in response to another thread post.edit on 12-4-2012 by pizzanazi75 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
Florida investigators say in an affidavit that George Zimmerman profiled, confronted, then fatally shot Trayvon Martin.
The link goes to cnn you can click to get the pdf
What else would the prosecuter say?
That does not mean thats what happen...
Thats there offense
Did you read it? It's not the prosecutors words, its the words of the investigtors as to why they brought charges.
So if you admit this report means nothing, I guess you will admit the original police report that claims bloody nose and head and yelling for help also means nothing.....right? I mean you can't have it all ways.
edit on 12-4-2012 by pizzanazi75 because: (no reason given)
I edited this earlier and pasted something not directed at you pops, if you read it, sorry. I don't know how it happened, but i removed it because it was in response to another thread post.edit on 12-4-2012 by pizzanazi75 because: (no reason given)
Of course its the words of the prosecutor she was the investigator. People really dont understand law and i noticed this during this mess. The state has to make charges against him or he would not be on trial. This is nothing like a police report. A police report is nothing but officer statements of the facts as they believed at the time. The affidavit is the states story on what they believe happened and then attempt to prove in court entirely different.edit on 4/12/12 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Ok ill make this simple i get you didnt go to law school. Now the affidavit that was filed is called an affidavit of probable cause. Now in this the investigator is Angela Corey shes the states attorney. Ostien and Gilbreth the people that presented it to the states attorney for deposition work for her.There statement will be whatever she decides its going to be its her show. All this affidavit does is tell you what the state will try to prove happened.This however does not mean that is what happened a jury will decide that. Does that clear up your confusion?
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Ok ill make this simple i get you didnt go to law school. Now the affidavit that was filed is called an affidavit of probable cause. Now in this the investigator is Angela Corey shes the states attorney. Ostien and Gilbreth the people that presented it to the states attorney for deposition work for her.There statement will be whatever she decides its going to be its her show. All this affidavit does is tell you what the state will try to prove happened.This however does not mean that is what happened a jury will decide that. Does that clear up your confusion?
Ill make it simple, im not confused about anything. These investigators came to the same conclusion the lead investigator that night came up with. There statement is based on the information gathered. Unless you dispute there statements. like I said before, they had the same information the original investigators had, and they came to the same conclusion, there is probable cause to show a crime was committed. You can try and spin it anyway you want and try to belittle me in the process but that won't change a thing.
On a side note.....I just love how people get so defensive when anyone makes any sort of comment on an internet discussion board. I guess they enjoy one sided conversations only. Thats when the superiority complexes start to come out with statements like 'ill make it simple', 'i get you didn't go to law school', 'does that clear up the confusion'.......
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Ok ill make this simple i get you didnt go to law school. Now the affidavit that was filed is called an affidavit of probable cause. Now in this the investigator is Angela Corey shes the states attorney. Ostien and Gilbreth the people that presented it to the states attorney for deposition work for her.There statement will be whatever she decides its going to be its her show. All this affidavit does is tell you what the state will try to prove happened.This however does not mean that is what happened a jury will decide that. Does that clear up your confusion?
Ill make it simple, im not confused about anything. These investigators came to the same conclusion the lead investigator that night came up with. There statement is based on the information gathered. Unless you dispute there statements. like I said before, they had the same information the original investigators had, and they came to the same conclusion, there is probable cause to show a crime was committed. You can try and spin it anyway you want and try to belittle me in the process but that won't change a thing.
On a side note.....I just love how people get so defensive when anyone makes any sort of comment on an internet discussion board. I guess they enjoy one sided conversations only. Thats when the superiority complexes start to come out with statements like 'ill make it simple', 'i get you didn't go to law school', 'does that clear up the confusion'.......
Well your obviously not getting it the affidavit is nothing more then a timeline and its extremely general have you read it i have. It doesnt make accusations on anything it simply states what the prosecutor the states attorneys office will try to prove happened that night,That doesn't mean they can prove it. Charges cannot be filled against someone unless some one presses charges and that's all this document does.
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Ok ill make this simple i get you didnt go to law school. Now the affidavit that was filed is called an affidavit of probable cause. Now in this the investigator is Angela Corey shes the states attorney. Ostien and Gilbreth the people that presented it to the states attorney for deposition work for her.There statement will be whatever she decides its going to be its her show. All this affidavit does is tell you what the state will try to prove happened.This however does not mean that is what happened a jury will decide that. Does that clear up your confusion?
Ill make it simple, im not confused about anything. These investigators came to the same conclusion the lead investigator that night came up with. There statement is based on the information gathered. Unless you dispute there statements. like I said before, they had the same information the original investigators had, and they came to the same conclusion, there is probable cause to show a crime was committed. You can try and spin it anyway you want and try to belittle me in the process but that won't change a thing.
On a side note.....I just love how people get so defensive when anyone makes any sort of comment on an internet discussion board. I guess they enjoy one sided conversations only. Thats when the superiority complexes start to come out with statements like 'ill make it simple', 'i get you didn't go to law school', 'does that clear up the confusion'.......
Well your obviously not getting it the affidavit is nothing more then a timeline and its extremely general have you read it i have. It doesnt make accusations on anything it simply states what the prosecutor the states attorneys office will try to prove happened that night,That doesn't mean they can prove it. Charges cannot be filled against someone unless some one presses charges and that's all this document does.
I get it just fine. Again, you saying Im 'obviously not getting it' means nothing, except you want to some how feel superior. If you need to feel that way its ok. I understand what I am talking about I don't need you to validate my views to know that I understand what is going on.
His pictures have not yet shown a sign of a broken nose
i wont no back pedaling from you guys when the evidence comes out