It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rebellender
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by kimish
. . people don't typically wear hoodies in 80 degree weather regardless of rain or not. It'd be too damn hot IMO so a hoodie could have aroused suspicion.
.
I'm 65 and I live in a hoodie. I have about 10 of them.
I'm near the ocean. Anyone who lives near the ocean or water knows how the weather changes. I never go anywhere without a hoodie.
Throw a tank and shorts on - - tie a hoodie around your waist.
If I was walking down the street at 7pm in the rain - - I would be wearing a hoodie.
why is hoodies Anne really? still on that one, come on
Originally posted by yeti101
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Again, I never said video couldn't be used a evidence in the Supreme Court
but in a previous post you stated this
Example. Video tape is reliable but it is not allowed to used in the Supreme Court.
edit on 2-4-2012 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)
Where in that statement did I say it was not allowed to be used as EVIDENCE in the SC?
Video cameras are not allowed in the SC when it is in session....why do you think all we are getting from the healthcare debate is audio?
If you had read, and comprehended all the conversation up until that point you would realize I was making the point that video is reliable but is not allowed to be used in the SC ... i never said anything about being used as evidence in a case in front of the SC....it went to show just because something is not used in courts does not mean it isn't reliable.
Would you like to try again?
right so your talking about filming proceedings in the supreme court thanks for clarifying that . Why the hell would you be talking about that when the conversation was about EVIDENCE which is allowed to be used in court . Its a totally diffirent subject , your "point" has no relation to what we were talking about.edit on 2-4-2012 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by pizzanazi75
I don't know where the bullet exactly entered...but if it did so from the back it's pretty much over for Zimmerman.
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
You didn't read the article. Lead investigators don't just 'go to' the state attorney on a sunday night to see if its ok to charge someone.
If he got arrested what was the charge?
Give me another example of when the state attorney has overruled the lead investigators recommendation in a homicide case the very night of the crime.
And don't forget my first question....if he was arrested what was he charged with? And is he still charged with that or have those charges been dealt with, dropped, or what? Please provide your source for this information.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by pizzanazi75
well you replied to my post which questioned why the 2nd expert doesnt think the evidence should be allowed in court. I theorised he must think it not reliable enough. You replied talking about filming proceedings in court
sorry bud its not me that has a comprehension problem. Maybe you should of found an example of reliable evidence that isn't used in court that would be much better. Instead of a completely unrelated topic like allowing filming proceedings in court.edit on 2-4-2012 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by rebellender
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by kimish
. . people don't typically wear hoodies in 80 degree weather regardless of rain or not. It'd be too damn hot IMO so a hoodie could have aroused suspicion.
.
I'm 65 and I live in a hoodie. I have about 10 of them.
I'm near the ocean. Anyone who lives near the ocean or water knows how the weather changes. I never go anywhere without a hoodie.
Throw a tank and shorts on - - tie a hoodie around your waist.
If I was walking down the street at 7pm in the rain - - I would be wearing a hoodie.
why is hoodies Anne really? still on that one, come on
What is your point.
You jumped in - - - where I was responding to someone making a comment about wearing hoodies.
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by pizzanazi75
I don't know where the bullet exactly entered...but if it did so from the back it's pretty much over for Zimmerman.
One single shot wound to the chest..
Please everyone in on this case knows
that..
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by pizzanazi75
I don't know where the bullet exactly entered...but if it did so from the back it's pretty much over for Zimmerman.
One single shot wound to the chest..
Please everyone in on this case knows
that..
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by pizzanazi75
yeah but it doesn't matter i'm interested why he doesnt think it should be used.
i'll bet if it does come to court the defence will have their own experts singing a different tune.
anyway the biggest piece of evidence has not been released which is the recording of the phonecall bewteen TM & his GFedit on 2-4-2012 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
reply to post by Annee
They can detain someone for up to (I think) 24 (or is it 48?) hours without charging them with anything. After that, they need to be charged or they can go home.
Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
Yes, you can be arrested without charges. You can also be charged with a crime without being arrested.
But once you have been arrested, they have 24 hours to officially charge you with something or they have to let you go. Zimmerman wasn't arrested, he was just brought in for questioning. They can also handcuff you without arresting you.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
reply to post by Annee
They can detain someone for up to (I think) 24 (or is it 48?) hours without charging them with anything. After that, they need to be charged or they can go home.
So its not an arrest unless you are charged with something?
I'm aware of temporary detainment.