It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Yep. I just commented on it. When she spoke, she actually hurt their case. In her story Martin contacted Zimmerman first. This kind of squashes all the people saying Zimmerman confronted Martin and tried to detain him or flashed a gun. Martin confronted Zimmerman to ask he was following. This matches Zimmerman's story except he said Martin was aggressive. Could very well be her bias showing through. She may be cleaning up the same aspect Zimmerman spoke of.
doesent this make out zimmerman to be a liar? i thought trayvon jumped out from behind a bush and cheap shotted zimmerman knocking him down and then got on top of him and repeatedly bashed zimmermans head into the ground?????????????????? lets all just stop assuming what happened until the federal investigation has rounded up all the evidence and witnesses.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Deranged74
Oh yeah.. let's hang him on the impossibility of his removing a bandage 4 hours after the incident. Or your omniscience in knowing that the paramedics even used a gauze.
Cleaned and used liquid stitches would suffice if he refused further care. He couldn't sue if he refused further care also.
And you seem unaware that it was four hours later that the video was made.edit on 30-3-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
It doesn't disprove anything. I could be in the middle of a sentence and punch you in the face. I could say "you have a problem now" and punch you in the face before you know what is up. It is possible and it disproves nothing.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Christ..pay attention.
The fact that Trayvon came back that says something. He took off running. He was gone. Why did he appear again? Why would he go back if he was afraid. That is why the contact matters. It shows that Zimmerman didn't run him down. He came back for some reason. Why do you think he would come back?
Be real. If he was the scared kid that was hunted and stalked as everyone else says he would have run all the way home. Not run into a shadow somewhere or circled back around and confronted GZ. That makes the most sense.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Or because she knew that admitting he said that would implicate he started the fight. Are you dense?
Also I said it was an opinion piece not a source for anything. It does bring up some great points.
Msnbc’s Thomas Roberts speaks with contributor and Managing Editor for the Grio, Joy-Ann Reid, and Rep. Corrine Brown about the new surveillance video showing George Zimmerman four hours after the shooting of Trayvon Martin, and what it means for Zimmerman’s side of the story.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Your source is at odds with my source. My source is MSNBC.
Msnbc’s Thomas Roberts speaks with contributor and Managing Editor for the Grio, Joy-Ann Reid, and Rep. Corrine Brown about the new surveillance video showing George Zimmerman four hours after the shooting of Trayvon Martin, and what it means for Zimmerman’s side of the story.
MSNBC
So yes, I say it again. It was four hours later. They wouldn't take him in after just 30 min it would take longer than that to get there and clear the scene and take witness reports. Sorry, 30 minutes is not a reasonable time frame.
According to the IT department of the city of Sanford, the timestamp on the video is accurate, meaning Zimmerman was at the station 36 minutes after gunshots were heard on a 911 call.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
I argued this same point on this same thread earlier. It is not supported by evidence.
Sorry. I was on your side of the argument before, but it is not backed up.
Listen to the audio tape. It is most likely he was returning to meet the police. "What if" he continued to the chase is just that a what if. Evidence does not support this. It is also unlikely he could run down a 17 year old football player who had a place to stay in that neighborhood and was already out of sight with a huge headstart (the whole time Zimmerman was on the phone).
Sorry evidence is on Zimmerman's side. I know that breaks your heart, but it's just the way it is.