It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by spacedog1973
Nope. There is no evidence but the witnesses and the fact that Zimmerman was underneath and had the damage done to him. You can't prove anything else, he was the one that was in danger of sustaining damage or death therefore he is justified. There is not really anything else they can investigate to come to a different conclusion. He is innocent until proven guilty and to charge him would be to risk putting an innocent man in prison which we can't do.
So case closed pretty much.
Originally posted by spacedog1973
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by spacedog1973
If TM was attacked, he has EVERY right to defend himself. So until it is known how the fight started, the injuries or otherwise to GZ are irrelevent except to prove that he was lying by saying his nose was broken.
SO they both had the right to defend themselves
and treyvon lost.
Remember men use to dual over
being calld an idiot. first with swords
then with guns..
If both idiots thought they were acting
in self defense which could be possible
then by all rights come hell or highwater
one of them was going to die did it have to be
that way? NO i think both of them stood there ground
one guy won one guy lost but dont hang the guy who won
a fight to the death for winning, either way it had turned out.
When you are attacked, you become the defender. There cannot be two defenders.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by spacedog1973
Yeah.. ok she still only spoke with the lawyer there and with questions from the lawyer. You are probably smart enough to know how it works with lawyers? Right?
Originally posted by pizzanazi75
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by spacedog1973
Yeah.. ok she still only spoke with the lawyer there and with questions from the lawyer. You are probably smart enough to know how it works with lawyers? Right?
Are we to believe Zimmermans lawyer? You are probably smart enough to know how it works with lawyers. Have you seen Zimmermans lawyer?
If I was Zimmerman I would be sh'ing my pants because his lawyer seems very underqualified.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Dude.. the video at the station was taken 4 hours after the shooting. Think of when you have something heavy on you. You don't actually roll it over, you push it up and slide it left or right and it falls same side down. Think of lifting a heavy coffin lid. You push up and then move it left or right.
Also there is no dispute that the shot was in the chest from extremely close range.edit on 30-3-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by spacedog1973
Yeah.. ok she still only spoke with the lawyer there and with questions from the lawyer. You are probably smart enough to know how it works with lawyers? Right?
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by spacedog1973
Yeah.. ok she still only spoke with the lawyer there and with questions from the lawyer. You are probably smart enough to know how it works with lawyers? Right?
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
After looking into what Martin's girlfriend said. I am actually more convinced that Martin started the fight.
She gave basically a cleaned up version of the same story the Zimmerman people gave. Zimmerman said Martin confronted him and said "do you have a problem." Martin's girlfriend said Martin confronted Zimmerman and said "why are you following me." In both stories Martin confronted Zimmerman first.
If Martin was scared of Zimmerman he wouldn't have come back and confronted him.
Also, this is just an opinion blog, but it is pretty unbiased and it does a good job of explaining.
glpiggy.net...
Martin's girlfriend said Martin confronted Zimmerman and said "why are you following me." In both stories Martin confronted Zimmerman first.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
After looking into what Martin's girlfriend said. I am actually more convinced that Martin started the fight.
She gave basically a cleaned up version of the same story the Zimmerman people gave. Zimmerman said Martin confronted him and said "do you have a problem." Martin's girlfriend said Martin confronted Zimmerman and said "why are you following me." In both stories Martin confronted Zimmerman first.
If Martin was scared of Zimmerman he wouldn't have come back and confronted him.
Also, this is just an opinion blog, but it is pretty unbiased and it does a good job of explaining.
glpiggy.net...
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Yep. I just commented on it. When she spoke, she actually hurt their case. In her story Martin contacted Zimmerman first. This kind of squashes all the people saying Zimmerman confronted Martin and tried to detain him or flashed a gun. Martin confronted Zimmerman to ask he was following. This matches Zimmerman's story except he said Martin was aggressive. Could very well be her bias showing through. She may be cleaning up the same aspect Zimmerman spoke of.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by pizzanazi75
Yep. I just commented on it. When she spoke, she actually hurt their case. In her story Martin contacted Zimmerman first. This kind of squashes all the people saying Zimmerman confronted Martin and tried to detain him or flashed a gun. Martin confronted Zimmerman to ask he was following. This matches Zimmerman's story except he said Martin was aggressive. Could very well be her bias showing through. She may be cleaning up the same aspect Zimmerman spoke of.