It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daaskapital
reply to post by SplitInfinity
You told me that Australia didn't have any significant battles with Japan, i proved you wrong. The USA came to Australia's aid after we had already defended ourselves successfully.edit on 30-3-2012 by daaskapital because: spelling
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
reply to post by SplitInfinity
While I think the Aussie's did a fine job of fighting the initial invasion events, I agree there is no way they could have kept Japan out. Way too much coastline with sparse population. They would have made landfall outside of the ports eventually, and once they had a foothold the rest would go quickly. Japan is close enough that resupply would have been easy.
Of course that doesn't speak to the readiness of today's AU military, but do they really need a big military?
Originally posted by daaskapital
reply to post by SplitInfinity
The battle in New Guinea was also classed as the battle for Australia. Yes there were Japanese Recon parties on the Australian mainland. Not to mention the 64 bombings on Darwin, and others on other main Aussie cities. Australia was directly threatened and targeted.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Garfee
We can't do everything all the time and it has cost us dearly...but you make me sick with this Anti-American...OH....we would be better off with out the U.S.A. Well...YOU WOULDN'T! Your Country would have been part of Japan for a while until we finally Retooled for War if we had lost at MIDWAY....but we WON! THUS...YOU WON!
If you think that your FREEDOM comes for FREE...ask the Thousands of Souls who lost their lives in WWII and if you take that FREEDOM for granted and do not protect it....but have the GOOD FORTUNE of a SUPER POWER that actually likes you and would be there for you....no matter what....AND YOU ALL KNOW THAT....and then even knowing that U.S. Soldiers, Airmen and Sailors...would DIE TO PROTECT YOU....without even a thought for their own lives....and you DISHONOR THEM by saying....WE DON'T NEED YOU! Well then....SHAME ON YOU! AND ALL LIKE YOU!
You have a Country that possesses NUCLEAR WEAPONS and is Launching ICBM'S in your general direction....and you think of it as NO BIG DEAL? What if...and there is a 20% Chance this could happen...North Korea...with it's New and inexperienced Leader...attemps a boarder skirmish...AGAIN...with South Korea....and the North goes a bit too far which causes the South to retaliate HARD...and a WAR breaks out...and because for examples purpose...Australia tells the U.S. to F" OFF! and tells the U.S. we don't need you! The U.S. takes exception and moves it's Carrier Groups with it's Aegis Missle/Satellite Destroying Cruisers to positions that are more advantageous to protecting Japan, Taiwan...and even ALASKA...but since Noth Korea ICBM tech has a range that can only make it to Japan, Taiwan or Australia and knows that the U.S. Carriers and Cruisers are positioned to destroy their Nuclear Tipped ICBM...so they decide...since they are going down...and Nuking the South is too close and will irradiate them...and Australia has told the U.S. to F' OFF! THEY LAUNCH A NUKE AT AUSTRALIA! They can hit it....it is in range and the ICBM could avoid the U.S. Cruisers ABM's if N.Korea launched a surprising vector.
Total propability of this scenario....ending with a HIT on Australian Land anywhere...50%...if the Carrier Groups were not in possition to defend Australia. So...GO AHEAD! FLIP A COIN! Split Infinity
Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
reply to post by daaskapital
not sure why they would aim it at the Aussies.
They are good people. they are nice. they don't really cause the world any problems, yet they aim weapons in their direction.
Makes no sense.
Pyongyang, March 29 (KCNA) -- The Hong Kong paper of China Asia Times on March 22 in an article titled "The north Korea launches satellite of love" said: The satellite launch is peaceful in every respect, and indisputably nothing to do with a missile test. It is a legitimate exercise by the DPRK of its inalienable sovereign right to peaceful exploration of outer use, universally shared by every member of the world community, including the U.S., China, Russia, Japan and France. No country, be it the US, Japan, south Korea, or any other Western nation, has any right to take issue with the satellite launch. The Korean Committee for Space Technology invited a bevy of experienced foreign experts on space science and technology and journalists to observe the satellite liftoff at the country's ultra-modern satellite launch center. The reason is to provide the promised maximum transparency for the launch. Obviously, there is nothing to conceal about the peaceful satellite launch. The reaction of the U.S., Japan and south Korea to the planned satellite launch could be called a Pavlov's dog-like conditioned response, or at best as that of a deer in the headlights.
The DPRK could neither overlook nor tolerate the U.S. gangster-like act. It was assured time and again that only nuclear weapons could curb the U.S. invasion. Nuclear dismantlement is possible only when one is absolutely sure of one's own security. To this end, the U.S. should start the work of recognizing the DPRK in a diplomatic way. It should discard the stand of regarding diplomatic acknowledgement as a great concession or as a show of good faith. The only way for it is to expand relations with the DPRK so as to lead it to dismantle nukes. The ball is in the U.S. court. -0-