It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Originally posted by rufusdrak
It is you that obviously have no understanding of American law. It's the same for a bouncer in a club they are allowed to escort out and subdue but not beat someone to a bloody pulp, for instance use strikes to the face etc. You're really reaching and it's only exposing your ignorance on the matter.
Wrong again. A Bouncer in a club can escort someone out without touching them. If they touch the customer without provocation, it is assault by the Bouncer. If the customer attempts to assault the Bouncer, the Bouncer than has legal rights to defend himself with an appropriate level of force. The reason a Bouncer can not beat you to a bloody pulp is because at some point it no longer is a case of self defense. Self Defense (since you missed it the first time), is using the appropriate level of force to stop an imminent threat.
Also, your example also brings up the issue of property rights. Which is not applicable in the case we are discussing, but I am sure with your amazing understanding of Law, you knew that already
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by rufusdrak
He has already 'demonstrated' why he pursued him very clearly: The neighborhood had suffered from breakins recently and Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch captain os that was his duty to pursue suspicious activity and report it to the police, so I'm not sure why that is not clear to you.
What isn't clear to those of us that aren't racist is what made Trayvon look suspicious besides him being black???
Maybe your genius intellect could point this out to us.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by rufusdrak
He has already 'demonstrated' why he pursued him very clearly: The neighborhood had suffered from breakins recently and Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch captain os that was his duty to pursue suspicious activity and report it to the police, so I'm not sure why that is not clear to you.
What isn't clear to those of us that aren't racist is what made Trayvon look suspicious besides him being black???
Maybe your genius intellect could point this out to us.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Originally posted by rufusdrak
Exactly you just proved my entire argument right and disproved yourself. You are allowed to use a REASONABLE amount of force which in the court of law quickly becomes UNREASONABLE when you are wailing away at someone's face with your fists while SITTING ON TOP of them. So just as you aptly pointed out, Martin's hypothetical defense has zero possibility of using 'self defense' because at that point when Zimmerman was on the ground beneath him, already had cuts requiring stitches and a broken nose, bleeding profusely on his face, it was no longer a reasonable amount of force that Martin was doling out on him.
Problem #1. My point is that Zimmerman created the chain of events which lead to the death of Martin. Weather or not Martin attacked Zimmerman is irrelevant. Maybe you should go back to my previous post on the topic of involuntary manslaughter for more details.
Problem #2 You are assuming that Martin assaulted Zimmerman. When the truth is, all we know is what position they were in during the confrontation. We do not know what caused the physical part of the confrontation or who was at fault. And again... since you keep missing the point, it is irrelevant to my argument for a case of involuntary manslaughter.
Originally posted by rufusdrak
He has already 'demonstrated' why he pursued him very clearly: The neighborhood had suffered from breakins recently and Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch captain os that was his duty to pursue suspicious activity and report it to the police, so I'm not sure why that is not clear to you.
Chris Tutko, director of Neighborhood Watch for the National Sheriffs' Association, said Zimmerman broke some cardinal rules.
First, he approached a stranger he suspected of wrongdoing.
"If you see something suspicious, you report it, you step aside and you let law enforcement do their job," Tutko said. "This guy went way beyond the call of duty. At the least, he's overzealous."
Originally posted by rufusdrak
He has already 'demonstrated' why he pursued him very clearly: The neighborhood had suffered from breakins recently
Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch captain os that was his duty to pursue suspicious activity and report it to the police,
Originally posted by MrWendal
Originally posted by rufusdrak
He has already 'demonstrated' why he pursued him very clearly: The neighborhood had suffered from breakins recently and Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch captain os that was his duty to pursue suspicious activity and report it to the police, so I'm not sure why that is not clear to you.
Wrong again. It is not his "duty" to pursue anyone. It is his "duty" to observe. This is even explain by someone in a much better position to know that you, the audio expert.
Chris Tutko, director of Neighborhood Watch for the National Sheriffs' Association, said Zimmerman broke some cardinal rules.
First, he approached a stranger he suspected of wrongdoing.
"If you see something suspicious, you report it, you step aside and you let law enforcement do their job," Tutko said. "This guy went way beyond the call of duty. At the least, he's overzealous."
Source
Originally posted by HereAgainGoneTomorrow
You really don't know the law...well maybe if you live in Kalifornia....I used to be a bouncer and under the law we could toss their a$$ out the door....the door being the key here. Once outside of the building the bouncer has no right to do anything!
The bouncer is the security for the establishment, and has the right to stop any disturbance within said establishment with physical force if necessary. Equal Force vs Equal Aggression...Understand????
Originally posted by rufusdrak
Anyone read this article?
www.americanthinker.com...
it shows the identical situation having occurred but reversed where the shooter is black and the shooter got off scott free.
Originally posted by RSF77
I don't see any of those people protesting when a white guy ends up shot on the wrong side of town. Everyone participating in this racist witch hunt is a fear mongering hate spreader just like the media.
Why should I care? Why should white people even care? In the last five minutes, a number of people were probably murdered all over the globe. The only reason people care about this one is because they are either racist or bigots, they have a dog in this fight. That is what these two people are reduced to... dogs. Now the "losing" side lost their puppy for once and we'll never hear the end of it as long as there is a profit to be made.
Really, I don't even think this is newsworthy.edit on 24-3-2012 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rufusdrak
Yes and in observing someone he is allowed to "follow" that person. I might have misspoken with the word "pursue" because to knee jerk guys like you it has too much of a strong connotation of a "chase" which many of you have incorrectly attributed to it. But Zimmerman is fully in his rights as a citizen and as a watch captain to OBSERVE someone and when that someone is no longer stationary and walks away, Zimmerman is still fully within his rights to FOLLOW said person and question them. Walking up to someone and asking them "What are you doing here?" is legal and under no manner of law does it give justification to the other person to brutally assault you and sit on top of your chest while pounding in your face, thus my case still stands correct.
Chris Tutko, director of Neighborhood Watch for the National Sheriffs' Association, said Zimmerman broke some cardinal rules.
First, he approached a stranger he suspected of wrongdoing.
reply to post by Chalupas
Actually, from his facebook posts we can assume he was a known drug dealer.