It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spav5
You are simply speculating like the rest of us.
Originally posted by spav5
So if it takes bigger boosters..they simply make bigger boosters.
If you are stating it as fact...I disagree.
Originally posted by zorgon
What I want to know is how does a guy like this...
get to work for Reagan's Star Wars program, develop the concept for the NAVY Clementine satellite, work for NASA, con DARPA and the NAVY NRL and only get 13 years minus time served
Originally posted by Bedlam
Ok, ok, you got me. The real secret is...they have a Burger King on the moon.
The reason that it's a BK is that the military has a contract with BK - there's you a conspiracy! Every base of any size - there's a BK.
I just wanted you to know that yes...I keep very busy and I'm on a 'mission'! My Mission is to keep America safe through development of some very exotic technologies. And yes, as you mentioned, I've worked on/with HAARP. If you want to learn more about that see US Patent #xxxxxx.If you read the patent you'll understand the relevance to HAARP and the Stealth Bombers, etc. You're an intelligent man and I'm certain that you'll be able to make the connection. If you read US Patent xxxxx, you'll understand (a little better) my connection to/with and collaboration with these men. LOL...suffice it to say that the 'Predator' (as in the movie) is alive/living at Los Alamos!
Hi, Ron...Good Morning! Thanks for the note and you certainly touch on points of similarity and interest (proving that great minds think alike!). I am free to talk about any of my published US Patents which are in the public domain. I am, however, under an edict from DoD under the NSA to 'report any inquiries relative to the stealth patent'. I had a phone call from a person who identified himself as an 'Under Sectetary of Defense' and the person read a statement to me which I later found was excerpted from the National Security Act, as amended. I was 'ordered' to report any inquiries of any kind, by anyone, to DoD relative to that case (patent). I've only had to do that one time in 20 years when a group of Israeli's, based in Philly, contacted me relative to undertaking collaboration on some 'project' in Haifa. I reported this as instructed and the group 'disappeared' shortly thereafter.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by spav5
So if it takes bigger boosters..they simply make bigger boosters.
If you are stating it as fact...I disagree.
Ok, ok, you got me. The real secret is...they have a Burger King on the moon.
The reason that it's a BK is that the military has a contract with BK - there's you a conspiracy! Every base of any size - there's a BK. All service members are coerced into having DINNER WITH THE KING! Perhaps due to the fact that the British secretly own the US???!! And let me tell you, I don't like Whoppers all that much anyway, given a choice between the Army food and BK, I was always debating which was worse. But I digress.
So, due to the contract, the military was required to put a BK on the moon.
Now, it doesn't make sense, because it's backbreakingly expensive, no-one's there to eat them except the employees, and you have to continually resupply the thing. Cola syrup just doesn't keep well in low gravity and pressure, donchaknow. But you can't PROVE there isn't one, and they COULD do it, so it has to be there!
You see, that's the end point of your logic. You can't prove a negative, and it *could* be done, so it has to have happened! Can't be refuted!
But from the more rational side, you generally try to prove a positive. Prove they ARE there. Hell, even give some reason why it would be desirable. If you could establish motive, means, method, and circumstantial evidence it might at least make it more interesting as a conjecture. Other than nuclear shaped charges for tunneling, if you were making a secret underground lunar base, there isn't one. Why would you spend huge amounts of money to emplace nukes a quarter million miles away, then have to constantly maintain them? It doesn't provide you with a tactical advantage, having them in LEO would, although that's bad enough logistically, but not on the lunar surface.
I mean, you don't even have them in circumlunar orbit, you're postulating they're on the lunar surface. You went down into another gravity well with your putative nuclear launch site - making taking off and landing to GET to them for maintenance or launching them even more painful, bulky, and expensive. Then when they get here, they'd have to have complex reentry systems - there's another thing you didn't consider. When you do a lunar return, the entry corridor is very very small and the reentry speed is fantastically high. There's a limited number of low energy return orbits, and the transit time is in days. There's very little room for miscalculation and you have to provide a really involved ablation system. You don't have to worry much about ANY of that for LEO reentry, which is why ballistic missiles aren't covered in a foot of ceramic.
Originally posted by Vandettas
Originally posted by fedeykin
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
I observe the moon through a high quality telescope all of the time, there are no bases or military on it as far as i have seen. Good luck building something on the far side in the dark though.
Ever heard of camouflage?
So when someone says "there is nothing on the moon & nothing being hidden on the moon"
you say : Disinfo agent.
But then when someone says "the moon can be viewed all the time by anyone through high quality telescope"
you say : Camouflage on the moon.
You really said "Camouflage"?!?
I have no strong feelings one way or the other on the subject but please...
I'd believe the so called disinfo agents before I'd believe in something like that.
At least they provide "fake" evidence and opinions rather the stories of
invisibility and 7/11's on the moon.
Originally posted by spav5
My guess is that you have not been told about the latest nukes..or any top secret government operation regarding this planet or any "heavenly" body.
Miscalculations this and that..lol. You have flown a rocket to the moon..or even into space?
You KNOW diddly squat..and that is only because you learned it from Diddly Squat.
Peace
Originally posted by Bedlam
There could be BK's on every heavenly body! You can't prove there aren't!! Every. Heavenly. Body. Put there by the government.
Originally posted by ProudBird
Shame because....the photo was, well....a well-known example of a NASA-type flight.
Originally posted by zorgon
This whole spy thing doesn't smell right though, I mean after all Gary McKinnon was going to get 76 years for a simple peek into unprotected computers that shouldn't have had anything sensitive anyway... (and he still hasn't been processed 10 years later)
So do they really have a 'Spy Retirement Home' like on that British series 'he Prisoner'?
Originally posted by zorgon
Well I am glad it's BK and not that McD's stuff
Originally posted by Bedlam
Wow, you must be psycho,
Welcome to your new retirement villa, Doctor. 100 acres of gently rolling red dirt, with lichens. We'll fly in some grass seed later. Hope you like that 'rammed earth' adobe look.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by spav5
My guess is that you have not been told about the latest nukes..or any top secret government operation regarding this planet or any "heavenly" body.
Miscalculations this and that..lol. You have flown a rocket to the moon..or even into space?
You KNOW diddly squat..and that is only because you learned it from Diddly Squat.
Peace
I wonder what it takes to be a lunar BK fry cook, Spav? Have you asked yet? DO THEY HAVE WHOPPER SPECIALS!!?
I mean, how do you know they don't? Have you been there?
There could be BK's on every heavenly body! You can't prove there aren't!! Every. Heavenly. Body. Put there by the government.
Originally posted by spav5
I know that you think that you are being cute and showing how intelligent you are...although you are not being cute...you are showing your intelligence.