For UK members. If you own a TV you must have a licence. WRONG!, page 1

We in the UK who don't do our homework (that means most of us) are led to believe that if you own a TV you must have a licence. We've always known it. Even the threatening big bro telly adverts have told us that. But it's a lie. It's confusing too, and relies on us being scared of going to court, or to jail. So we cough up our nearly £150 per year like obedient puppies. It's like paying gangsters to leave you alone. You might not need to pay them.

This thread isn't about showing anyone how to break the law. This is about pointing out why you might not need something that you're paying for religiously every year.
I think I might not need a licence. More correctly, if I tweak my lifestyle a tiny bit more then I definitely wont need one. But will I still be hassled if I'm within the law?

This is what I've found out so far.

Myth 1 - you own a TV you must have a licence.

From the TV licence website

A reminder of the law.
The law states that you need to be covered by a TV Licence if you watch or record television programmes, on any device, as they're being shown on TV. This includes TVs, computers, mobile phones, games consoles, digital boxes and Blu-ray/DVD/VHS recorders.

You don't need a licence if you don't use any of these devices to watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV - for example, if you use your TV only to watch DVDs or play video games, or you only watch ‘catch up’ services like BBC iPlayer or 4oD.

Myth 2 - the TV detector van will catch you if you watch TV without a licence.

But no evidence from a detector van has ever been used in court. Has it? Here's an example of how confusing things are for us.How do TV detector vans work? Do they know what channel you're watching, or just that you have the TV on?

TV Licensing detector vans – menace or myth?

The BBC explained that the number of detector vans in operation, the location of their deployment and the frequency is not common knowledge. It relies on the public perception that the vans could be used at any time to catch evaders. This perception has built up since the first van was launched in 1952 and has been a key cost effective method in deterring people from evading their licence fee.

The BBC state that to release information which relates to the number of detection devices and how often they are used will change the public’s perception of their effectiveness. If the deterrent effect is lost, the BBC believes that a significant number of people would decide not to pay their licence fee, knowing how the deployment and effectiveness of vans and other equipment will affect their chances of success in avoiding detection.

TV licence cheats make up a TENTH of all magistrate court cases - (and two out of three are women). Is it because there are so many cheaters that honest non-TV watching and non-TV owners are being hassled so much?

TV Licence Fee: briefing

You DO need a licence -

You need a TV Licence to watch or record TV programmes as they are being shown on television, irrespective of what channel you're watching, what device you are using (TV, computer, laptop, mobile phone or any other), and how you receive them (terrestrial, satellite, cable, via the internet or any other way).

You DON'T need a licence -

You do not need a TV Licence if you are watching TV after it has been shown on television, eg TV programmes downloaded or streamed after broadcast.

I rarely watch TV as it is being shown on TV. If it's on, it's to watch a DVD, or some odd show I've missed as it was being shown on TV, so I'll catch it on Iplayer or 4OD. You don't need a licence to watch them.
On the TV licencing website there's a form to fill in if you want to cancel your licence. Seems easy enough. But what happens after? How often do they come to the door pretending they have more rights than they do and want access into your house? That happens. People who don't even own a TV are sent letters threatening investigations, warrants, hefty fines and even jail. Has anyone on ATS given up telly and experienced this treatment?

Again - I want nothing to do with any illegality. I just want to know the facts. This is about changing a little thing in my household so I can save on the licence fee, which I disagree with because it's outdated and bad-mannered and threatening. But I want to know what I'm up against. It's not as simple as stopping watching TV "as it is being broadcast".

Letters from BBC Television Licensing

I enter my seventh year as a prisoner in my own home, but the good news is that I have saved £966 by not paying TVL/BBC and, assuming 50p a letter, cost the BBC a further £29 in postage.

Here's where a fraction of the licence fee money goes.
BBC expenses: list of salaries earned by BBC's top managers
BBC spend £13m chasing licence fee avoiders
The price of beauty: BBC to spend £100,000 of licence fee payer’s money on make-up artists for news presenters

Some youtube vids regarding TV licences, and those home visits I mentioned.

This is what happened next. The bloke with the camera admits he was a plonker to this very nice police woman but the interesting part is that the police woman does not know TV licencing laws and even she thinks if you own a telly you need a licence.

reply to post by wigit

---

I suspect many are more clued up than you give them credit for. But many just don't want the hassle. There is an excellent forum (tv licence resistance).
The thing to remember is that you don't have to give any jumped up jobsworths who come to your door access - unless they have a warrant. You don't even have to talk to them or confirm or deny anything.

reply to post by wigit

---

i havnt paid for one for years .. id like to know how much of the tv licence goes to the bbc .. as i understand it they dont show adverts so thats why we pay the tvl unlike the other channels who get there money from adverts .. and if so the bbc should take the bbc of air and charge people subs to have it on .. i dont watch the bbc so why should i have to pay get adverts like everyone else .. this is ofc depending on how much of the tv licence funds raised goes to the bbc

Originally posted by JonoEnglish
To be fair, the licence fee, over a year isn't that expensive. By finding loopholes and refusing to pay, you push the cost up for everyone else.

I find it hard to believe the majority of those who don't pay, won't watch the channels live throughout the year because they haven't paid for the licence, or use any BBC service.

hya
no
not paying the bbc will not push prices up for you or i
check out this link
look at the table
cheers
dave
www.guardian.co.uk...

reply to post by The Sword

---

Most TV networks get their funding from advertising or Product placement. The BBC has no adverts for commercial products so relies on a licence for it's funding.

More and more people are using laptops and other devices so the licence is becoming a bit of a defunct mechanism of gaining revenue.

I have never minded contributing to the license as I enjoy quite a lot of BBC content. Although it has definitely gone down hill recently.Personally, I think it would be a shame if we lost the BBC as a public broadcaster, but understand why people would not want to pay for something they don't use, with so much other choice now available.

reply to post by JonoEnglish

---

Exactly. I have no objection to paying towards a free to air and advert free service. Plus tyhe BBC is actually the best content maker around at the moment.

I would rather object to Council tax more than the TV licence, which just for a month is more than the licence is for a year and regardless of ability to pay, you must pay it or have your wages garnished or go to Prison.

reply to post by JonoEnglish

---

Believe what you will, not everyone needs to sit in front of a box to have fun or entertain themselves.

Ive not watched tv for years, i watch the occasional documentary...online, i watch AlJazeera news live online as well as some others....but i tend to stay away from the bbc news as much as possible.

BBC could have put in adverts long ago, the reason the license was introduced was because back in the day, there was no such thing as advertizing on tv. It was a way to fund the broadcasting costs. They have no reason to charge a license fee now....except for greed. Its a guaranteed income...they dont have to worry about looking for people to advertize.


Prices dont go up because people arent paying their license. It goes up because they have convinced the majority that it is a legal requirement, brainwashing.... and because of this can pretty much do what they like.

They say they dont advertize, but ive seen on numerous occasions the BBC pushing products, such as ipads, iphones, books, films....they have programs devoted to advertizing....Click is one example, that film review thing with Jonathon Woss (I know...its Ross lol)...of course they are paid to promote this stuff.

You pay more for the license because the rest of the world get the BBC for free.

It nothing but a scam

reply to post by loves a conspiricy

---

The license fee doesn't just towards the BBC News or their TV channels. In fact, it only covers around 75% of the BBC's broadcasting costs. They make 25% of their revenue selling their high value programming via the BBC World Service.

It also pays for a lot more besides, as well as a grant for Channel 4 (yes, that too is a state owned channel) and paying for the infrastructure over which the entire terrestrial TV service is broadcast (so ITV, C4, C5 etc etc). The BBC also do a lot of R&D into new technology which a "for profit" company wouldn't do.

It always strikes me that those who bleet about the licence fee rarely know what it is for. They make the assumption that it pays simply for the BBC without any thought as to what it is the BBC does.

Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags

Judge furious about undercover Police as Provocateurs in Occupy Movement in Texas
  Posted 5 days ago with 53 member flags

The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags

New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags

Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags

Civilian jet with 81 civilians shot by French Mirage instead of Qaddafi Plane over Sicily?
  Posted 17 days ago with 20 member flags

What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags

How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: