Originally posted by spoor
That would be the lawsuit that berg lost as he had no evidence at all, wouldnt it, and every appeal he made was thrown out....
en.wikipedia.org...
Berg v. Obama
On August 21, 2008, Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg, a Democrat and former deputy state attorney general, filed a complaint alleging that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii, and was therefore a citizen of Kenya or possibly Indonesia, where he lived as a child. He alleged that the "Certification of Live Birth" on Obama's website is a forgery. U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick dismissed the complaint in October 2008, finding that Berg lacked standing to bring the case and that his attempts to gain standing to pursue his claim were "frivolous and not worthy of discussion."
Bypassing the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Berg filed a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in the United States Supreme Court. On December 10, 2008, the Supreme Court denied Berg's request for an injunction against the seating of the Electoral College, scheduled for December 15. On December 15, 2008, the petitioner refiled the application for injunction. Two days later, Berg's appeal was denied without comment by Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. Berg's previously denied request for an injunction was refiled with Justice Antonin Scalia on December 18, 2008. On January 12, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari. The application for stay addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court was also summarily denied on January 21, 2009.
On November 12, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that Berg lacked standing.
Essek v. Obama
Daniel John Essek of Witney County Kentucky filed a pro se federal lawsuit in the Kentucky Eastern District Court on November 25, 2008. The suit was originally filed as a Freedom of Information Act case, but was amended to a judicial challenge to Obama's qualifications for the Office of President of the United States. Essek sought to prevent the inauguration of Barack Obama on the grounds that Obama was not a "natural born citizen" based on allegations that Obama was born in Kenya. District Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove dismissed the suit because of a lack of subject matter jurisdiction, stating that Mr. Essek's grievance was the generalized grievance of a voter, not a specific injury that would have granted him standing to sue.
Kerchner v. Obama
Attorney Mario Apuzzo, on behalf of Charles Kerchner and other plaintiffs, sued Obama, the U.S. Congress, Dick Cheney, and Nancy Pelosi in January 2009 alleging Obama was ineligible to be president, and that Congress failed to verify Obama's eligibility. A federal district court in New Jersey dismissed the suit, ruling the plaintiffs lacked standing. On July 3, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, citing Berg v. Obama, affirmed the dismissal, and ordered Apuzzo to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for initiating a frivolous lawsuit. Apuzzo's subsequent request for a hearing was denied, but the order to show cause was discharged. On November 29, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court declined, without comment, to hear the case.
Sibley v. Obama
Montgomery Sibley, a disbarred lawyer who once represented Deborah Jeane Palfrey (the so-called "D.C. Madam"), sued Obama in January 2012, alleging that he is not a natural-born citizen and that his birth certificate is a forgery.
citizenwells.wordpress.com... ent-standing-challenged/
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, >>I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court. This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does? So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned<<.
Berg at least appealed to the Supreme Court immediately, but just because the Supreme Court dismissed it, it does not necessarily disprove Obama's so-called "Hawaiian BC" as the experts determined as hoax. The experts proved and showed how this "Hawaiian BC" is forged, but that's not enough to raise a case against Obama.
You don't know wether Attorney, Democrat and former Deputy State Attorney General Philip J. Berg have evidence or not, 'spoor'.
I have another one who lost a case against George W. Bush Jr. , you see, Attorney Stanley Hilton sued George W. Bush Jr. for ordering the attacks on the Twin Towers. Hilton says he have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened, and that Bush Jr. had seen this simulated on TV many times. Stanley says that incriminating documents shows that Bush personally ordered the 911 events. Stanley said the FBI broke into his office department, harassed and threatened his staff, that the FBI took the original documents, but Stanley said that at least he is hiding the copies of these documents somewhere where the Shadow Government agents can't find them. As Stanley Hilton said >>My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file cabinets - it was obvious they had been rifled through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this particular case and particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact that the - some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll of the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents. They are spying on Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect, all this led up to the effect that al Qaeda is a creation of the George Bush administration, basically. That the entity that he called al Qaeda is directly linked to George Bush. And all this stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of the harassment. The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants and has planted a spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics are being used - and the obstruction of justice, these people are criminals. And that's what's happening under the tremendous pressure here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just go away<<.
Stanley Hilton lost his case against George W. Bush Jr. , but just because people also sued Obama, it does not necessarily make Obama a bad guy compared to for example George W. Bush Jr. (amazing informations even shows that Prescott Bush financed Hitler's war campaign)
It just seems there is a good chance that Obama is trying to cover up where he is actually born, and i think he have good reasons to try to cover it up, but like i said, Obama is a great represenative for the United States, and i mean it.
Who knows, maybe Obama discovered too late that he was actually born in Kenya? Maybe he first discovered that after he became President? We can only speculate on that, and no matter what, i really hope he shall be re-elected as President. If i should choose between Bush Jr. and Obama, i would definitely prefer Obama as President, and like i said, i can guarantee you that Obama will be re-elected as President.
edit on 29-3-2012 by
Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)
