Hard Evidence for Simulation Hypothesis Uncovered! COMPUTER CODE Discovered Hidden in Superstring Eq

page: 5
206
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by MeesterB
Interesting, if true, but these type stories don't really excite me. Mostly because I can still die of hunger or freeze to death. He basically summed it up by saying that he could give references that no one would understand. It's sort of like saying we found a planet identical to earth, but it is 100,000 lightyears away. Neat, but trivial.


Or like saying : "We've discovered the secret to eternal life. but you wouldn't understand because you are actively denying what is in front of your face"

or: "It's possible to walk on water and raise the dead but you wouldn't understand or even seek to learn how because you deny it"

It's funny. Science is really funny. People think it's something it's not. Like somehow all these things scientists figure out will lead to an easier way to admit what has already been right in front of our faces all along.. and written about in excruciating detail for 1000's of years.




posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:12 PM
link   
reply to post by metamagic
 


brilliant. i am an artist and writer, and i research ancient peoples because i realize all art and literature is based upon ancient myths, folklore, bibles, etc.

this explains it to me in that kind of way.

its like this. picasso said he stole everything he did from looking at other artists. so right now, the only way to see an 'original' artist, would be to isolate someone, to never let them see a thing, like on a desert island or something. then, if the kid becomes an artist, to see what kind of art they could 'create.'

BUT that kids art would be influenced by the island, the ocean, clouds, sun, stars, etc.

so people forget how connected we all are. i never understood it, but there is some kind of rhythm to the sun, earth, solar system, galaxy, etc. and isn't it in tune with a heart beat or some crazy thing like that?

meaning, there is a rhythm to the universe. so then that rhythmic beat gets passed to the sun. which then creates the solar system, all having the beat in tune. then the earth, then life, all in tune with the earth's beat, which is in tune with the solar system's beat, which is in tune with the sun's beat, etc.

so your explanation is right on.

ALSO, i do not like how quantum physics can be affected by mass judgements and beliefs. its like positive thinking. if they publish an article by some quack job, and the media picks it up, and people start to 'believe' it, then thru 'thinking' it is real, it 'becomes' real in the future.

i would be amazed if we are computers, because how the hell did they come up with dreaming?

plus, i know who i am. which means i am real. if you are reading this, then you are real too. if you are not reading this, then my 'interpretation' of what i observe as 'life' is fake.

but i am real, because i am observing it.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:18 PM
link   
When computer code began to be understood, from that point on the universe began to look like a computer. Yet this has been true of all new technology - the machine age (universe looked like a machine), the gods and goddesses of ancient religions (the universe followed their lead), even Copernicus and the age of mathematics, there, again, an explanation of the entire universe. What's next on this parade?



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   
also, i believe in 'god' who created things. but the concept of god is beyond my ability to realize. so the universe is god.

so if god sets things in motion, then maybe he builds these 'error correcting codes' into things to keep things evolving.

i find it more reasonable to believe in a multiverse, than this simulation concept. but if there is a multiverse, im not so sure there are more of me out there. just lots more spaces to explore.
edit on 22-3-2012 by dantanna because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   
Dreaming could be de-fragmenting of the computer so its in better working order when it turn on ie wakes up like a quantum computer can be ON and OFF at the same time awake/asleep.
edit on 22-3-2012 by blobby because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Everything in reality is a reflection of the information provided by the nucleus, our known universe is build from the sub atomic up to the galactic by strict patterns nothing within the known universe can brake this pattern as it is dictated by the nucleus of our universe. The universe and all we know exists within a membrane we call space this membrane is connected to the information nucleus via + and - charged regions.

Energy and information is recycled from the membrane towards the nucleus via (-) black holes, this cycle then is repeated back to the surface membrane via (+)white holes all information and energy gathered in the nucleus is then converted and re distributed to the membrane in such a manner that creates an infinite universe within a finite space.

Nothing that exists within our Univercell is lost everything is transferred.
Imagine a tap filling a bath with random particles and on their journey to the plug hole (black hole) on the journey from point A to B their are many steps between our creation in an instant and slowly expanding through space to its eventual end.

I don't know why I feel this, I just do it is just the way I see things I might be wrong but something told me this and who am I to refuse the impulse of thought, the idea came to me in an instant and know its like I have never known any different.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:32 PM
link   
Without even looking at the video, which I can't watch at the moment, I absolutely guarantee this is a hoax.

If it were even remotely real, it would be all over the tech news, not leaked out in some random youtube video. And besides, I would have heard about it.

Anyhow, how can code appear in an equation? That doesn't even make sense. It is like saying that the contents of the Bible have been found written in the number 2.

And to say that it appears in a "superstring equation" betrays ignorance. String theory is not yet tied to reality. It's a mathematical theory only. Computer code doesn't appear in mathematics.

Sorry, but it's definitely a hoax.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:33 PM
link   
This is amazing! It truly is.
Super-string theory is an attempt to unify general relativity with quantum physics, which by them selves are mutually incompatible. If one is correct the other one cannot be... a true dilemma or paradox.

When trying to unify this theories you end up with a universe with something like 10 physical dimensions in addition to time. Only then is it possible to reach a set of equations that can describe or unify all of the fundamental forces of nature.

If the force of gravity was slightly different than it is, the universe might not have existed at all. Same goes for all the forces of nature. A slight deviation, and nothing would have come of this universe. Others may have existed (or do), but would probably not have produced a viable universe for life as we know it.

What this "discovery" inside this incredibly complex equations suggests, is that there is built in to the very fabric of the forces of the universe an error-correction that ensures that the universe corrects itself should these forces deviate over billions of years... because if they do...the universe will seize to exist


It's incredible beyond comprehension



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:34 PM
link   
When I did some math to "teach the son of man to read", I worked with that form of equations. The simpler form was "cascade correlation" formed "Neural Networks". Search algorithms applied to find the best solution to each node's characteristics. The "Genetic Algorithm Neural Network" was by far the best at introducing random changes (mutation) and pruning to the optimal solution (tyranny). The results I patented included things like...

1. 7,313,267 Automatic encoding of a complex system architecture in a pattern recognition classifier
3. 7,233,692 ... identifying output classes with multi-modal dispersion in feature space and incorporating multi-modal structure into a pattern recognition system
4. 7,181,062 Modular classification architecture for a pattern recognition application
...
7. 7,130,776 ... producing a pattern recognition training set
8. 7,113,636 ... generating training data for a new class in a pattern recognition classifier
9. 7,031,530 Compound classifier for pattern recognition applications
...

And yea, DNA adapts and optimizes over generations in a similar way - and shined a light on the "how" which could be emulated. Considering it applicable to the concept of space-time and string theory? Cool!



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:39 PM
link   
I don't know about you guys but i feel like im in a
Dream most of the time,maybe we really are in a simulation.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:45 PM
link   
Sorry to burst all your bubbles but this is a pile of bovine excrement. Superstring has been tweaked so much that it dosent represent the universe as it really is. Theres been no experimental data proving string theory. Back to the tweaking of the superstring theory. So much of the superstring theory has been rewritten in order for them to balance it out. They have lost sight of the real universe and made up their own universe. It is no wonder they are seeing hidden code its code thats come out through their tweaking of superstring.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by XtraTL
Without even looking at the video, which I can't watch at the moment, I absolutely guarantee this is a hoax.

If it were even remotely real, it would be all over the tech news, not leaked out in some random youtube video. And besides, I would have heard about it.

Anyhow, how can code appear in an equation? That doesn't even make sense. It is like saying that the contents of the Bible have been found written in the number 2.

And to say that it appears in a "superstring equation" betrays ignorance. String theory is not yet tied to reality. It's a mathematical theory only. Computer code doesn't appear in mathematics.

Sorry, but it's definitely a hoax.


No it's real (a real observation/hypothesis, doesn't mean it's right/true of course), I posted a link to his essay from 2010 in Physics World on the last page (here it is again)

Here is a good breakdown of Dr. Gates' (& others) ideas.

If you'd like something more technical here's a related paper from Dr. Gates:
SUSY Equation Topology, Zonohedra, and the Search for Alternate Off-Shell Adinkras

Here is Dr. gates' papers on the arXiv if you are interested.

Also see: A Universe Programmed with Strings of Qubits(.pdf)
edit on Thu Mar 22 2012 by Rren because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:01 PM
link   
I wonder if there is a quantum effect being exposed here. We know that the closer you observe events that occur on the subatomic level, the more likely you are to effect the outcome. Would it be possible that these correction codes that are being exposed are actually being injected artificially into the mathematics by some unknown mechanism or hysteresis effect at the quantum level?

Do not really understand what I am even saying, because I am not a quantum physicist, but to find our own inventions exposed when trying to decipher a string theory equation seems unbelievable.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:01 PM
link   
Emphasis mine....


Originally posted by XtraTL
Without even looking at the video, which I can't watch at the moment, I absolutely guarantee this is a hoax.


Links contained within the video description:
arxiv.org...
being.publicradio.org...

Namaste.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   
i wounder if we are compatible with the new tablet?

with this info as a leg to stand on would make the " god " theory
very probable. since information is never really lost
we would just go to the great recycle bin in the sky



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:11 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:12 PM
link   
reply to post by minor007
 


I was responding to the claim that it was a hoax, not that it was correct.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lapislazuli
IF we are all simulated programs in a hard drive of a future super computer....and that is a big IF.. then would this not mean that we are without souls or free will?
edit on 22-3-2012 by Lapislazuli because: (no reason given)


I tend to think that the limits of free will within the system only come from the competing wills within the system itself. There's no "controller" deciding which direction I walk, who I speak with, what I do with my days and weeks and years, but there is a set of rules of the system. As an example, 9.8 m/s is the force of gravity. Humans have learned to fight against gravity (effectively pitting human will against the "will" of gravity) - so you can't just decide you're going to leap into the air and fly around, free of gravity, but you can find a way to overcome the force of gravity - for example, airplanes, hot air balloons, etc.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by XtraTL
Without even looking at the video, which I can't watch at the moment, I absolutely guarantee this is a hoax.

If it were even remotely real, it would be all over the tech news, not leaked out in some random youtube video. And besides, I would have heard about it.

Anyhow, how can code appear in an equation? That doesn't even make sense. It is like saying that the contents of the Bible have been found written in the number 2.

And to say that it appears in a "superstring equation" betrays ignorance. String theory is not yet tied to reality. It's a mathematical theory only. Computer code doesn't appear in mathematics.

Sorry, but it's definitely a hoax.


I cannot blame anyone familiar with physics to make an uneducated first guess at a statement like this and scream hoax..... Even so, it appears to be legit. Too much scientific busyness in this currently, and no one (no scientist) is actively trying to debunk, just trying to understand it. It is a mind bender, and the physicists behind it, including the author are the creme on the physics of milk. What they see is probably there, but it does not belong there, so they are the best to debunk their own revelations. Fantastic as it is, it has to be reconciled.

Most of the public does not go there, so I am not surprised at the media not being in this yet.
edit on 22-3-2012 by charlyv because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 02:20 PM
link   
love the thread, thanks op

it's absolutely fascinating the way our thinking of the world is changing, the more we figure it out and investigate it. I'm much more in favour of a simulation type hypothesis than a natural, "we are the only one" system. Our world has changed amazingly in 100 years, can you even imagine what we will be doing in 1000 or 10,000 or 100,000 years!!

For a long time i've made myself more anxious and more scared the more i think about what we are "taught" about how life started with the "big bang" and the story they tell us. In my mind there are just too many unanswerable questions and the more you think about it the more uneasy you become in realising that our reality can not really be what we have been taught to understand.

My biggest scare is the whole chicken and egg thing. We are in an endless loop, you cant go from a state of nothing to a state of something, so how the hell did the universe start? how was the very first thing in the solar system created? you need ingredients to create something, you just can't go from a state of nothing to a state of something, and if we started from a state of something then where the hell did those ingredients come from? how were they made and so on and so on, it's a broken problem with no answer, an endless loop.

The whole never ending expanding universe is scary too. To think of something with no boundries, so there's no edge? so what are we expanding into? Just seems bizarre to think of something with no limit and no edge, going on forever and ever.

It's really quite mad and scary to think that really we have absolutely 0 idea about who or what we really are and how we were created, we have no idea of the solar system at all, we know what's in it, but not what the system is itself, how it was created, where it came from, and we have no idea if its all we've got or if we're in something with a boundry and once we punch a hole in it we can move to a different universe, we just have no real clue at all.

scary stuff when you really use your mind to dig deep into it

edit: had to add the South Park take on evolution

edit on 22-3-2012 by Equ1nox because: (no reason given)





top topics
 
206
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join