Obama once again depicted in art by John McNaughton destroying the Constitution

Originally posted by DaTroof
reply to post by EnochWasRight

 

This is getting off-topic, but until the child exits the womb, it is part of the mother. The mother has every right to abort her child, just like she can cut off her own finger. A child is not a US citizen until it has a SSN, and it can't get one of those without a certificate of LIVE birth.

Very shallow. So your saying that a piece of PAPER is a right to live? So if I have no SSN should I be killed? I have no certificate of "LIVE" birth much like Obama, should I be killed? Your logic is pitiful and grossly absurd.

Let me ask you this Obama loving shill, your heart beating means what to you? How about this, Would you not agree that having SEX causes a baby? If having SEX causes a baby you've already made the CHOICE to have a baby. "Can't do the time don't do the crime" Same goes with babies, don't want a baby then don't do the act that CAUSED the baby. A mother NEVER has the right to abort her child because she chose to have sex. That's why abortion is logically flawed

Originally posted by Flyzoid
reply to post by EnochWasRight

 

If you read into that executive order you will find that it has been around for many years and it has been updated by quite a few presidents, democrats and republicans alike. The updates Obama made were minute. That executive order has been around for more than a half a century! Deny ignorance por favor
👍

Not so. Minute is not saying that your wealth can be taken in peace time. Sorry. His best bet would have been to repeal the law entirely, along with the Patriot Act and NDAA. It is obvious what he is pulling. They are seeking to slowly push the protections in the constitution aside for Socialist Corporatism. It is no longer possible to hide behind lies. When the audience knows the tricks, the magician is finished.

reply to post by mosheh24



This is my last response concerning abortion, since that's not what this thread is about.

Without documentation, a baby born or unborn does not have any rights and is not protected by laws.

Are you seriously trying to suggest people stop having sex? I think you need a night away from the computer. Go clear your mind and mingle with some singles.

Originally posted by DaTroof
reply to post by mosheh24

 

This is my last response concerning abortion, since that's not what this thread is about.

Without documentation, a baby born or unborn does not have any rights and is not protected by laws.

Are you seriously trying to suggest people stop having sex? I think you need a night away from the computer. Go clear your mind and mingle with some singles.

edit on 21-3-2012 by DaTroof because: (no reason given)

That response is hugely pathetic. Sex is not an essential thing in life. It's a desire a want but not a need as in not having it you won't die. SO yes if one can't take care of a child then don't do the act that brings a baby. Wow so a paper is what gives us our right to live that's pathetic.

reply to post by EnochWasRight


The executive order does not state the president can take somebody's wealth. It is all how you interpret it. example: An executive order can state that most sheep are white. Yet somebody would interpret it as saying that the potus that signed it is racist lol

Congress shall have the power to declare war - not the President.
The attack on Libya was an impeachable offense.