It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama once again depicted in art by John McNaughton destroying the Constitution

page: 1
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   
Here is the painting.



Full Image


This picture represents itself. Words are lacking. I appreciate anyone who is willing to stand for truth and deny ignorance.

Website


edit on 21-3-2012 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-3-2012 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:52 PM
link   
And what has Obama done in violation of the Constitution?

This is just shock art for someone not very good at painting to make a name for himself.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:55 PM
link   
reply to post by DaTroof
 

One thing comes immediately to mind. The assassination of that Al Anwari (spelling?) guy who was a SUSPECTED terrorist. Innocent till proven guilty?
ETA He was a US citizen, just to be clear.

edit on 21/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: ETA



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaTroof
And what has Obama done in violation of the Constitution?

This is just shock art for someone not very good at painting to make a name for himself.



You can't be serious, right?

Oh wait, you are?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:00 PM
link   
Art truly is a form of truth and here's the truth.

I declare it a Masterpiece and henceforth it shall be called: "21st Century Dictator"

Peace





edit on 21-3-2012 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:15 PM
link   
"I'm putting that on my Facebook!"

No, but really, I am. This man needs to be stopped - the fire has begun and will continue to burn unless we the people extinguish it.

This picture captures it perfectly.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by LightSpeedDriver
 


So that's it? He was in office when a military strike killed a US citizen guilty of treason? That's what makes him the destroyer of the Constitution? Don't you think you're overreacting?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaTroof
And what has Obama done in violation of the Constitution?

This is just shock art for someone not very good at painting to make a name for himself.



Really? What branch of the administration do you work for?

Take a look at the latest executive order to strip you of your land, money, home and business at will. Then take a look at Obamacare and the mandate to collect mandatory payments from all Americans to fund the slaughter of innocent children (Abortion). Then take a look at the mandate in Obamacare to place a microchip under your skin if you want health insurance or treatment.



edit on 21-3-2012 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:22 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


Alex Jones? The man who has been predicting doom for 11 years straight? C'mon man, you can do better than that. Abortion is a real problem??? Since when? Only the fundamental Christian right has a problem with abortion.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:26 PM
link   
reply to post by DaTroof
 


Here you go, courtesy of: dailycaller.com...


10 — 9/11 Responders Relief Fund: Giving the 9/11 first responders money after the fact violates the Constitution. Article 1.8 gives Congress the right to expend funds for all the purposes itemized, provided it is done for the general welfare, NOT for individuals or preferred groups. The states may reward heroes if they so choose.
9 — Checks and Balances Failure: The Chairmanship of the UN Security Council: Where was Congress when President Obama became the chairman of the powerful UN Security Council in 2009? The normal monthly rotation for that chair goes to the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. because Article 1.9 of the Constitution forbids the president (and all other office-holders) from accepting any present, foreign office or title from a foreign country or a foreign potentate unless it is specifically authorized by Congress. The Founders wanted to prevent deal-making, corruption, and foreign influence from affecting America’s internal affairs.

8 — Net Neutrality: The government is trying to stop Internet providers from blocking or slowing some web traffic and prevent providers from showing favoritism. The FCC thinks it should be able to regulate the Internet like it regulates utility companies. This violates the property rights of Internet providers and interferes in the market’s free choice of which services receive funding. Article 1.8 makes it clear that the FCC is not constitutionally authorized to pass laws, especially those disguised as regulations.

7 – Czars: Article 2.2 grants the president leeway to appoint managers, but those managers may not have any regulatory, legislative or law-making powers — such powers are reserved to the legislative branch. Today’s “czars” have the power of cabinet members without having to go through a vetting process or the confirmation process prescribed for cabinet members. Czars are unelected and untouchable political decision-makers — in violation of Article 1.1.

6 — Cap and Trade: The Clean Energy and Security Act mandates greenhouse gas emissions be reduced to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, 42 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, and 84 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. By 2020, this tax will extract an estimated $160 billion from the economy, or an average $1,870 per family. Once again, had the chains of Article 1.8 not been broken, America would be spared such tomfoolery. Cap and trade masked in any disguise whatsoever cannot be justified as a general welfare activity.

5 — Cash for Clunkers: The government offered $4,500 rebates to people turning in their clunkers for more fuel-efficient vehicles. When the first program quickly ran out of the $4 billion allotted to it, another $2 billion was added. Follow-up analysis showed the program did nothing to stimulate the economy and put many people into additional debt by encouraging them to purchase cars that they otherwise would not have bought during these hard economic times. The government has zero authority to selectively give individuals tax money for purchases of vehicles, according to Articles 1.2 and 1.8 — and common sense-by-obama-and-the-111th-congress



4 — TARP Funding: The original 2008 act authorized $700 billion to bail out banks and other institutions. Article 1.8 excludes permission for Congress to grant financial aid or loans to private companies. Any use of Treasury funds must go toward the general welfare, not to specific groups.

3 — Illegal Immigration: Arizona is being invaded. When that state passed SB 1070 to stem the flow of violent illegals into its sovereign territory, a derelict federal government turned around and sued. At issue was the Feds’ failure to control the border, so Arizona took it upon itself to do just that — to uphold existing federal immigration laws. It didn’t add new laws; it simply gave local authorities the power to enforce federal responsibilities. The federal government claims the right to manage immigration, but when it refuses to carry out that obligation, thereby jeopardizing the security of border states, it is derelict in its duties. U.S. shall protect states from invasion - more than 400,000 illegal aliens in Arizona is, by definition, an invasion.

2- Economic Stimulus Bill: The $814 billion stimulus is the most backward-thinking proposition to come along since human sacrifice. Dumping borrowed money into an over-fed, bloated and out-of-control ogre doesn’t solve anything, it simply temporarily props up with blocks of melting ice cream a failed and failing government of extravagance. Not only does it illegally take money out of the economy that could be used to provide jobs, but it’s using borrowed money — with interest due.

1 - Health care reform. 'Nuf said.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:31 PM
link   
reply to post by FissionSurplus
 



Sorry, none of those are big deals at all, and some of them are just short-sighted opinions. I'm afraid the anti-Obama crowd has nothing worthwhile to say about the man.

This painting is just like the anti-Bush bumper stickers... shock art for contrarians.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaTroof
And what has Obama done in violation of the Constitution?

This is just shock art for someone not very good at painting to make a name for himself.



Obamacare
Signing statements
Intervening in Libya without congressional approval
NDAA
Extention of patriot act
.....



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaTroof
reply to post by FissionSurplus
 



Sorry, none of those are big deals at all



Hahahahaha... exposed yourself right there buddy. Get lost



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:36 PM
link   
reply to post by bacci0909
 


And how has your personal life been affected? Cash for clunkers stole your job? Or maybe the bank bailout prevented you from exercising free speech?

How is your life any different from any Obama administrative decisions?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:37 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


Love it. I have the other picture he did saved on my computer because it is really well done, and encapsulates exactly what is going wrong:





posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaTroof
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


Alex Jones? The man who has been predicting doom for 11 years straight? C'mon man, you can do better than that. Abortion is a real problem??? Since when? Only the fundamental Christian right has a problem with abortion.



Please, refer to it as it is. It is the killing of a defenseless baby. It's a problem for the baby who is denied the gift of life. It's a problem for the mother who lives with the pain all her life. It's a problem for this nation when life is no valued on equal footing with our God given freedoms of life and liberty. Can a baby, slaughtered in the womb, find life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Where is the baby's choice?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:46 PM
link   
reply to post by DaTroof
 


If your screen alias doesn't expose you as an Obama puppet, your posts sure do. Yes, it's perfectly OK that he did those things IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION because it's just small potatoes, right?

How much do you get paid to be a shill for the administration?

If you're ok that our president violates the constitution because it's no big deal to you, then you should be ashamed to call yourself an American. It is never ok, no matter who does it or what party they belong to. He took an oath to uphold the very document he is shredding. I voted for him, but NEVER AGAIN. As far as I'm concerned, he is a a traitor and a wall street puppet.

You can report back to your boss that your attempts at derailing and denigrating this anti-Obama thread have failed.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaTroof
reply to post by bacci0909
 


And how has your personal life been affected? Cash for clunkers stole your job? Or maybe the bank bailout prevented you from exercising free speech?

How is your life any different from any Obama administrative decisions?


US Code is in direct violation. If you have no rights, you have no freedoms. I was just as apposed to Bush and his UnPatriot Act. None of the leaders that violate Section 242, Title 18 of US code deserve to be defended in any way.

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being
an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed
for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or
an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned
for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to
death.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:47 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


If you read into that executive order you will find that it has been around for many years and it has been updated by quite a few presidents, democrats and republicans alike. The updates Obama made were minute. That executive order has been around for more than a half a century! Deny ignorance por favor
👍



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


This is getting off-topic, but until the child exits the womb, it is part of the mother. The mother has every right to abort her child, just like she can cut off her own finger. A child is not a US citizen until it has a SSN, and it can't get one of those without a certificate of LIVE birth.


Would you rather a child never suffer, or never have opportunity?




top topics



 
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join