If it's true: an analysis of the 188 days earthquake cycle.

page: 1
3

log in

join

posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:38 PM
link   
There's just a point I'd like to make. If there really is a pattern, it will take a 9.0+ magnitude EQ to prove it. Let me explain why. This isn't a prediction, just an analysis of the prediction. And there's a different pattern I would like to point out as well.

CHILE 8.8-February 28, 2010
NEW ZEALAND 7.1- September 4th, 2010
JAPAN 9.1- March 11th, 2011
FIJI 7.3- September 15th, 2011
(Notice a pattern? I'll make it obvious in a second)

Someone claimed that this 188 day pattern is due to a massive object heading in the direction of earth. Let's imagine for a second that there was an object on it's way. The supposed claim is that whenever this object, the sun, and Earth align, there's a massive earthquake. We can assume that if this is true, then the Earthquake would be larger when the Earth is between said object, and the sun. And when the sun is between the earth and the object, the Earthquake would still occur, but it would be of diminished magnitude.

When the Earth is aligned and in between Sun and Hypothetical(I need to stress this is all hypothetical) object:
Chile 8.8-February 28, 2010
Japan 9.1-March 11th, 2011
?????????-March 22nd, 2012

When Earth is aligned with hypothetical object and the sun, but not in between:
NEW ZEALAND 7.1- September 4th, 2010
FIJI 7.3- September 15th, 2011

Do you see the pattern now?

Let's say hypothetically that there's a massive object heading towards our sun. Then tomorrow, there will be a 9.0+ Earthquake.
If there's a 7.0-9.0 Earthquake, there might be a pattern not fully understood, BUT it is NOT caused by an incoming object.

I'm trying to prevent people ahead of time from being scared if an 8.0 EQ happens tomorrow.
and to make sure people are aware of an incoming object, if that's the case and a 9.0+ EQ happens tomorrow.


edit on 21-3-2012 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:42 PM
link   
The sun started shining really bright through the clouds and now its making a really illuminated bright sunset through clouds.

I'm wondering if there is a CME I missed hearing about.

Really High Frequency all day.

I don't believe that we're on the bad timeline any longer, nor should you. Reach higher than that one! Its all around us, the whole frequency range.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99


I don't believe that we're on the bad timeline any longer, nor should you. Reach higher than that one! Its all around us, the whole frequency range.


I don't either, and I don't think any of what I wrote about will happen.
It's all just hypothetical. I'm writing it just in case.
edit on 21-3-2012 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:49 PM
link   
I agree, in order for this ''pattern'' to work, I have to believe that the Mexico earthquake, was not part of it.
It was too small.
People who think that the 7.4 was ''the 188 day earthquake" are just trying desperately to make this pattern work... by making any large earthquake fit the bill.
(Don;t get me wrong, I'm not saying 7.4 isn't significant, but if we're going to take this 188 day thing seriously, then it has to be bigger than that...)
Sorry but a prediction was made, this pattern will either produce a 9+ today, or it wont.
I'll accept tomorrow, and I'll also accept an 8.5... anything else and I'm afraid it's just straw clutching..


edit on 21-3-2012 by Deplume because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:54 PM
link   
I've already proven the 188 day thing to be crap, people are calculating the dates using the timezone where the earthquake occurred, this gives a false amount of true days from the previous quake.

If you take the Jap and Fiji earthquakes, and compare them both using Jap local time, which is the way it should be done, it is 189 days. (and 187 true days from Fiji to the one in Mexico, sticking to Jap time for comparison)
edit on 21/3/12 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by woogleuk
I've already proven the 188 day thing to be crap, people are calculating the dates using the timezone where the earthquake occurred, this gives a false amount of true days from the previous quake.

+/-1 day out of 188 days isn't statistically significant.
edit on 21-3-2012 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:30 PM
link   
Why limit yourself to one cycle when there are so many to choose from?
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:33 PM
link   
I agree with your hypothesis, and the only thing that I would add is a reminder of the two day window,, Before and After the NEW MOON,, which is on Thursday the 22nd. So,, if a 9 mag doesn't happen tomorrow,, I would still be wary for two more days. IMHO.

Good thought regardless.

Another thought would be ,,, if this were to happen close to the Middle East,, say the in the Afar region of the Rift Valley of Ethopia. It has been quiet and I have been thinking it is about time for it to wake up.

Maybe also the Strange BOOMs and sounds heard lately are connected in some way with the Earth's Core venting around the Cascades.

My personal pick is an extinct little known volcano area in Antarctica. That would really get the spin going with the whole SHTF thing... would not be good for any of us.

as so often said,,, interesting Times we are living Regardless..

Peace to all.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   
Here is a nice little video re the 188 day theory



Doesn't look to good for the theory



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 01:08 PM
link   
I think god don't make any pattern (If he existed). He is random the whole universe and we human are one of his solution.
edit on 5-9-2012 by tracetotrade because: (no reason given)





new topics




 
3

log in

join