A Deeper Earthquake Cycle?

page: 2
37
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 04:13 PM
link   
You should know by now Phage that you need a fancy Google map with lines drawn all over it and arrows pointing to random places to be taking seriously around here right?/end sarcasm

No really, I am glad you were proactive and did some leg work instead of just de-bunking or jumping on the wagon and rolling on. Puterman also did some calculations and because of ATS we are recognizing some really neat things. Maybe not scientifically but neat all the same. While people are screaming the 188 day theory we at ATS (you) trek on and evolve it to something better.

I have a box of Girl Scout cookies calling your name if you can hit it with a location!

*Looks around for Puterman to come in and verify Phage and his prediction.*




posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage

Do I expect the cycle to hold? Not really, but if it does do I get a cookie?
edit on 3/21/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)


Crumbs Phage
...........................Hope your wrong for a change



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 04:25 PM
link   
I really didn't expect this from you Phage since you are the ATS guru in astronomy. Are your calculations in geology just as good as your ones in astronomy? This is one of those threads that came from left field...



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 04:32 PM
link   
S & F

Thanks Phage, and this appears to be very credible data.

I will certainly be on the watch for the upcoming dates.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 04:36 PM
link   
My safe little bubble world has popped
Phage for pity's sake when are the hostile aliens from Andromajuice arriving
I got get my plasma Zap gun in place



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 04:58 PM
link   
This thread reminds me of A Modest Proposal. Great work!



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:10 PM
link   
Well my little bit of code has been running long enough. It sniffed out cycles (up to 5 years in length) in the occurrence of earthquakes of 7.0 and greater since 1973. The minimum number of repetitions to "qualify" is 5. There are a whole lot (a whole lot) of cycles with repetitions less than 5.

Based on various cycles, these are the results. The last column indicates when the earthquake would fall if the cycle continues.

edit on 3/21/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:12 PM
link   
Very interesting. There is much more to the Mexican quake though, it was done by the numbers.


3/20/2012 -- ALERT! VERIFIED TRUE ! Mexico 7.9M Earthquake PRE-PLANNED = MAN MADE !!

The daughter and the Pope figure in, I have to find that info, but something to do with the 7.4, her age, and the birthday.

They always do this by the numbers.

I don't doubt this bigger cycle though. So two cycles came together.
edit on 21-3-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 
Good to know
Several cycles seem possible to me
edit on 21-3-2012 by violet because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-3-2012 by violet because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:16 PM
link   
Would be good to see locations of specific cycles
Does the location vary - I am guessing it does
edit on 21-3-2012 by artistpoet because: typo



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
Well my little bit of code has been running long enough. It sniffed out cycles (up to 5 years in length) in the occurrence of earthquakes of 7.0 and greater since 1973.

Based on various cycles, these are the results. The last column indicates when the earthquake would fall if the cycle continues.
edit on 3/21/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)


Wooohoooo! So according to the 1241 day cycle there will be a big quake on my birthday in a few years! Question....was this just a random cycle generator you wrote? It is a bit interesting that the 188 day cycle showed up in it if so. But is seems as if the original 188 Day Cycle video/post suggested that the Mexico quake was not the one he was predicting.

What if you run it for a 7.5 or 8 or higher? Any difference and does the 188 cycle even show up?

Just wondering....either way.....not a supporter of the cyclic theory. Though history repeats itself, I can't imagine that natural disasters follow that.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:25 PM
link   
Oh my, Phage has gone off the deep end! That's what happens when you can't find any sane people to talk with.

I predict there will be an earthquake everyday this year!

Party time! Serve Phage his cookies first, he's the host.

All these belong in the Predictions and Prophesies thread don't they?
edit on 21/3/2012 by Trexter Ziam because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:41 PM
link   
Ohhh man, not another one...

Watch this video.. it should explain to people why this whole "188 day" cycle is nothing but unsubstantiated bullcrud.


This Video here explains it.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Vasa Croe
 

For 7.5+ we hit the 899 day cycle. 4 repetitions.
That's the only one with 4 (or more) repetitions.
edit on 3/21/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Heh, nice! So Phage, if these cycles turn out to continually stay consistent and keep repeating on said dates, are you going to believe that these cycles accurately predict large earthquakes?
edit on 21-3-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:52 PM
link   
Phage you made me smile, you must be damn bored today


Having said all that, I wonder if there is a way to correlate all of these cycles, it would be interesting to plot the location of each earthquake in a cycle and see if they relate to a specific fault line or each plate at least. If each cycle, or some cycles were affecting only one particular tectonic plate there may actually be something in this



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 05:54 PM
link   
I will now burn my phage card.

So,you are the one behind this,you sneaky little devil.

www.earthquakesummary.info...








Just joking of course.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 06:27 PM
link   
 


Hey! How about everyone stick to the TOPIC and not members.
The topic is: A Deeper Earthquake Cycle? Debate and discuss THAT!

Mod Note: Post On Topic – Please Review This Link.

 
edit on March 21st 2012 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


That can't be right. There's nothing predicted for December 21, 2012. Shenanigans, Phage...shenanigans.

I'm sure we can also find clusters of quakes at locations with predominantly female demographics demonstrating a 28-day cycle. Of course, we could classify such a cycle as a lunar phenomenon, but I think we all know what the true cause would be.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:08 PM
link   
There are no known proven cycles and /or causes of earthquakes other then the movement of the tectonic plates in days.
Maybe in years,but not 188 days and so on.
Man,what an ATS killer,you know,now what are we going to talk about?





new topics
top topics
 
37
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join