It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Best Swedish UFO Sighting Yet?(HD)

page: 8
53
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by NeillieN
i am going to stabilize this footage and post it soon.
why bother?




posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:35 PM
link   
reply to post by CaLyps0
 


I was just joking around. sorry my sense of humor is so bad that you took it seriously.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by greeneyedleo


you are saying that every time you research something your conclusion every time is unidentified? really? so when someone misidentifies that sparkly thing in the sky as a UFO when it really is just Venus.....you still draw the conclusion of "unidentified"


how do you know for a fact it's really Venus they have seen to call it a misident??



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by dejarmaX

Originally posted by greeneyedleo


you are saying that every time you research something your conclusion every time is unidentified? really? so when someone misidentifies that sparkly thing in the sky as a UFO when it really is just Venus.....you still draw the conclusion of "unidentified"


how do you know for a fact it's really Venus they have seen to call it a misident??


I wont get into that here. It is off topic.
There are plenty of threads around here with misidentifications that were identified as actual identifiable things. Is it a star, planet, aircraft lights, satellite or.........a UFO? Find out here!



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by greeneyedleo

Originally posted by dejarmaX

Originally posted by greeneyedleo


you are saying that every time you research something your conclusion every time is unidentified? really? so when someone misidentifies that sparkly thing in the sky as a UFO when it really is just Venus.....you still draw the conclusion of "unidentified"


how do you know for a fact it's really Venus they have seen to call it a misident??


I wont get into that here. It is off topic.
There are plenty of threads around here with misidentifications that were identified as actual identifiable things. Is it a star, planet, aircraft lights, satellite or.........a UFO? Find out here!
it's off topic is it? oh ok then... maybe you'll aswer the question somewhere else.. oh joy



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:44 PM
link   
reply to post by dejarmaX
 


The topic is:

Best Swedish UFO Sighting Yet?(HD)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:46 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 
yeah i understand.. forget it



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:50 PM
link   
reply to post by dejarmaX
 


Ok so would you rather be told what it is or is not or be told what you want to hear?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
reply to post by dejarmaX
 


Ok so would you rather be told what it is or is not or be told what you want to hear?
you've lost me... anyways, you went off topic, not me:




you are saying that every time you research something your conclusion every time is unidentified? really? so when someone misidentifies that sparkly thing in the sky as a UFO when it really is just Venus.....you still draw the conclusion of "unidentified"



peace.

dej...



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by NeillieN
i am going to stabilize this footage and post it soon.


Thank you, looking forward to it



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:46 PM
link   
wow this vid certainly fired some people up! lol Well personally looking at the vid I am at first and second and third glance very impressed. Im not one to just immediatly jump on the Bandwagon. I find the typical "mysterious light in the dark skies" vid to be totally unconvincing, Ive looked thru the scores of shamelessly obvious ufo hoaxes on YT, so I can "feel" if a ufo vid seems implausible or just fake altogether,. There have been a few that have made me really wonder and this one does just that. Ive no technical skills that allow me to analyze such vids so I leave it to the "experts" that are much more tech savvy to make an opinion then after more conjecture I make my own. . But based on vids Ive seen and the seemingly majority consensus here on ATS re. this thread I will say...this is a very interesting video!



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:57 PM
link   
reply to post by dreadphil
 


Why doesn't it get smaller when it is hundreds of yards away?

The sizing isn't right.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by NeoVain
Just got wind of this clip and this has got to be one of the best ones i have seen yet, and it seems very authentic to me. You should go to youtube and watch fullscreen and 720p for the best quality, where it is actually possible to see the craft reflect light from the sun at one point.



The guy in the sleigh is screaming in swedish to his sister, i will translate it for you non swedes: "-Carina, Carina(name of sister), shut it down got damn it! Shut it down!(Stop the vehicle)" he gets noticeably agitated and angry at the sister that does not seem to understand him and just continues driving, causing him to repeat the same saying again.

Since some people naturally came out of the woodwork soon after it was put on youtube calling it a hoax, the poster made another vid explaining what happened swearing it was not a hoax, and that it was real, along with some background info. Here is the interview.



So....?
edit on 20-3-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)



Swamp gas.... Because it's cold ( did you see the snow ) a large pocket of swamp gas froze into the shape of a flying saucer, upon being squeezed out of mother earth's behind, and a strong wind sent it careening off the top of trees...



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:11 PM
link   
reply to post by dejarmaX
 


Are you serious? That's your logical explanation? Because the uploader does post-processing CGI work, means his video is a hoax. Seriously, that's your reason for justifying it a hoax...a "blatantly obvious" hoax. Logic and reason. The fact that the uploader does work with video effects, only means that he is capable of creating something like this. It does not mean he created it. It means, the likelihood that he created it using CGI increases, it does not mean, without a doubt, that he did in fact create it. It only calls for more, closer scrutiny, but it does not automatically make it a hoax, or him a hoaxer. It only makes him a suspect, not guilty. Sure, he is suspected with good reason, but to still say "Well, because he does CGI work, everything he uploads that can be created with computer software, was in fact created with computer software by him" is an extremist and closed-minded way of thinking. I'm sure the uploader knew he'd come under heavy fire, having all his CGI videos on his page for the world to see.

We may not ever know for certain, but dismissing it entirely because the uploader is involved with a field of work that can produce these things is a bit short-sighted. Crimes aren't solved that way! If one is suspected...they investigate further. If crimes were dealt with the way you're suggesting, a lot more innocent people will be in prison, and a lot more criminals would be walking around freely.

Maybe someone with experience in video editing and post-processing effects can download the 720p version and take a closer at it. I know there are a few specialist who analyse these sorts of things daily, looking for geometric anomalies, inconsistency in lighting / shadows / reflections, artifacts that are commonly generated by computer image creating software, etc. I'm sure someone out there can help persuade or dissuade concretely, the claims of hoax or real.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by AGWskeptic
reply to post by dreadphil
 


Why doesn't it get smaller when it is hundreds of yards away?

The sizing isn't right.


It does get smaller. look again. When it is behind the large trees in the beginning it is clearly larger than at the end when it goes over the smaller trees farther away and disappears.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by loves a conspiricy
Ok....so as promised a video explaining why i think this is fake




ETA....this vid may be made private and one added with no audio.....music means i cant put adverts on lol....i think thats why i cant monitize it!!!! If so il post the new link


edit on 21-3-2012 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)


EDIT: Yup im deleting the audio....il post the new link in a min once its rendered and uploaded

edit on 21-3-2012 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)


Needs to be posted again.

It seems that some people missed it the first time.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 11:16 PM
link   
Looks like the craft out of flight of the navigator (if that's the name of the film im thinking of)

Compliance...



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 11:19 PM
link   
Can we have anyone with CGI experience check the sunlight on the ufo as it moves please? Because I don't even know CGI and I don't think it looks right at all. It's as if the sun is sometimes reflected and looks right, other times not at all. The thing I don't get is that I'd have thought keeping a consistent reflection effect on the craft would be fairly easy?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 11:51 PM
link   
I don't care what language you speak, when I hear a bad actor I know its a bad actor.
FAKE



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by loves a conspiricy


No sound.....knew it!!! no sound means i can monitize it....happy days


Best do the same with my nibiru over antartica vid....1027 views in 3 days

edit on 21-3-2012 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)


This is the one that works.....the one linked above is deleted

edit on 22-3-2012 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
53
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join