It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ajay59
So you are admitting that a particle has been accelerated beyond the speed of light!
I did not realize how little you understood about these issues.
The speed of light in a vacuum is a fixed value. Light travels slower than that while passing through matter. It is possible to have a particle move faster than light can within matter. The particle brakes and gives off radiation that can be detected.
You can read the following link and learn something instead of acting foolish
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by camus154
Originally posted by JonU2
How does anyone know the truth?
Scientific research is corrupt - evidence is discarded or ignored because it doesn't fit into present theories...........
Who decides what is taught in schools and why?
Just...no, JonU2.
Science may not be perfect, it may be created and advanced by humans who are not perfect, but that doesn't null and void the entire scientific endeavor. Saying science doesn't know it all doesn't allow you to say science doesn't know anything.
Look down at the keyboard you're using right now. Look up at the screen that's showing you these words right now.
Wanna know how you can even talk to me in this manner, separated by the doubtless countless miles between us?
Because of science.
So no. Please don't hide behind the "there is no real truth anyway" cop out.
Then why don't you give up on trying to sway those who believe in possibilities?
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ajay59
Then why don't you give up on trying to sway those who believe in possibilities?
Actually we are discussing the impossibilities. No massive unknown object can be within 340AU since it would be detected.
You are completely ignoring the fact that it was impossible to move beyond the speed of light!
Why does an HMO have to be detected by our known scientific methods? I seen recently that E=MC2 is not quite right when scientists accelerated a particle beyond light speed! Our science, as we know it is not right!
Originally posted by JonU2
There is, imo, a big influence on science by those who have power (yes, I danced around the edges there), who decide what can be allowed into the the public arena or what can be kept private.
Therefore, every science that has been allowed into the public arena is not complete..............
Originally posted by ajay59
IMO, the naysayers are way to determined about an undetectable HMO! They seem to have inside info that science has everything exactly right on!
IMO, the naysayers are way to[sic] determined about an undetectable HMO! They seem to have inside info that science has everything exactly right on!
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ajay59
You are completely ignoring the fact that it was impossible to move beyond the speed of light!
False. It is impossible to move beyond the speed of light in a vacuum.
Clearly you did not read the link I posted.
Furthermore your previous claim quoted below is false.
Why does an HMO have to be detected by our known scientific methods? I seen recently that E=MC2 is not quite right when scientists accelerated a particle beyond light speed! Our science, as we know it is not right!
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ajay59
IMO, the naysayers are way to[sic] determined about an undetectable HMO! They seem to have inside info that science has everything exactly right on!
A straw man argument. No one is saying that science is correct in all things. Scientists would never be caught making such an inane statement.
What we do know with great certainty is that there is zero evidence for a planet sized mass with 320AU.
This does not make it impossible for smaller objects to be there such as asteroids.
This does not make it impossible for large objects to be far, far away.
What friggin difference does a vacuum make? BEYOND THE SPEED OF LIGHT!
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ajay59
What friggin difference does a vacuum make? BEYOND THE SPEED OF LIGHT!
You don't have to scream your ignorance.
Read the link because it is very clear you have no idea what you are talking about. I have great confidence that you can read and understand the material.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ajay59
You are saying science is correct in all things by saying this OP is impossible according to science! Now which is it?
Reading and comprehension seem to be lost on the video generation.
I never stated that science is correct in all things. I'll even quote myself for you.
No one is saying that science is correct in all things.
Not too hard to understand I hope.
It is impossible for there to be an unknown planet sized or larger mass in the solar system with 320AU. That's well worked out by science. In fact, that is based on old data - like 8 year old data. By now the constraint is probably pushed much farther out.