It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Heavy Mass Object In-Coming?

page: 17
77
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
You think I don't realize there's a lens cover over the Sun
That is not what I was referring to...


Then what ARE you referring to? Everything else in that picture looks like a typical shot of the sun.


but hey, thanks for reminding me what some members IQ's are though!


Thanks for using insults to make your arguments have more ground, it's nice to know what kind of people I share the net with.




posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


What were you referring to then?

The image bleeding?

The low quality?



What are you referring to is more the question?
The SOHO behind/a. images?
If so, I am talking about the 'ball' above the Sun at 12:00 position.

Bleeding bests describes it.

Please play nicely with the others, okay? I'm asking nicely Chad. Thanks



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Shugo
 


I'm sorry then. But I took it as a huge insult that you don't think I know the fundamental basics of SOHO.
Who doesn't know the Sun is blocked out except an idiot!

I do apologize though.
I was talking about the image right above the (blocked out) Sun.






Are you and Chad playing with my .? Is it that un-obvious? To me it stood out like a major something (glitch).



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


I'd certainly hope you'd consider your tone, especially if you want to sway me to listen to your claims.

This image does not have anything out of the ordinary that I can see. All I see here is another image of our Sun, that was different from the last image, which was different from the image before that.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by camus154

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Let NASA analyze it?


When? In between them hiding data or airbrushing photos?

I posted it so people WOULD give me their opinions. Unlike you... because all you gave me is a hint to your vile personality!

See ya!


Well that was certainly a....strong....reaction to a mere recommendation.

Look, I can make some stuff up if that makes me a Better Contributor with a better personality (light & love?), but I don't know...that just seems kind of duplicitous.

Know what I mean?



Firstly, who asked you?
Secondly, act whichever way suits you best and
Lastly, I don't need a guidance counselor or a behavioral specialist



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


It looks to be a small prominence erupting.

Probably from the C class flare that occurred that same day (today).




edit on 21/3/12 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:48 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


It looks to be a small prominence erupting.

Probably from the C class flare that occurred that same day (today).




edit on 21/3/12 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)


Thank you Chad



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


It's not hard to predict an earthquake when you give yourself a three day window. On average there are 150 earthquakes a year that are 6.0 or greater. This means that you can expect a 6.0+ earthquake every 2.43 days. I also suggest you look into the history of Terral Croft. There are plenty of Elenin threads where he is mentioned.


This earthquake even made news though comon.... do you see a news report of a earthquake every 2.43 days? noooo



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
 

Not sure what to make of this but this person finds, what he's calling this mass object on several Internet maps.
What the hell is that round thing on Google Earth?



Uploaded by ReviewsHardware on Mar 12, 2012
I found this in 3 map programs. Also I found out that some images in google sky can also be just a couple months old some years old. I think its a couple months old because microsoft telescope uses realtime data so how can a object just be in one single place for a couple of years?

22h35m54.78s -04 25'08 Aquarius

Ahhh alien. Look at your own evidence. In the YouTube video above the hoaxer slips at 3:40 in the video. For only a moment you see the selected "object". I took a screen shot just for you:


Circled is the description of the object he has selected in the window.

This is a Nebula

Check the coordinates ( red arrows) and circle in window. At left is his cursor and high lighted selection. Goto 3:40 and watch carefully. He's quick, but not that quick. He's an intentional hoaxer because you can see he hides the window just as soon as it appears. This nebula is far from our solar system. It is not "inbound".



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
I'm a big boy. I start ALL my threads with an open mind and TOTAL respect towards others. ALWAYS.
I however, don't always get that back.


You know what? I've been riding you pretty hard tonight and when I read the above, I realize that's perfectly true, and I realize I haven't given you respect when I've disagreed with you.

In all sincerity I apologize to you for that. It's easy to get caught up in your own opinion and to forget that another human being is on the other end of the dialog.

Good night.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:55 AM
link   
reply to post by WanderingThe3rd
 


Why would you report on an earthquake every other day, especially if it happens in a less populated area, or an area not populated at all? Furthermore, why would you report if there wasn't much of a reaction by the general public in that area?

How can anyone imply that plate tetonics are impacted by other PLANETARY OBJECTS other than the Moon?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:00 AM
link   
Terral is on the money again!



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:02 AM
link   
Hey Human_Alien, What is your take on all this data? Can you give your view of what can possibly be expected on any kind of time frame? If you feel that would be painting a target on your back, it would be perfectly understandable should you choose not to answer. Just curious and it seems as though you may have put some time into researching this?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:04 AM
link   
reply to post by intrptr
 


Thank you for taking the time to break that down for me/us. I really have no idea what you're saying but I know what you're inferring and.....that could very well be (that he's a hoaxer).


Wouldn't be the first time I posted from one of them. They are just getting so good. And like you said, fast and slick!
But I can't say for sure that this was one until I figure out what you're pointing out. I will tomorrow.

Again, I really appreciate your effort and time. Thanks



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by intrptr
 

Thank you for taking the time to break that down for me/us. I really have no idea what you're saying but I know what you're inferring and.....that could very well be (that he's a hoaxer).

Wouldn't be the first time I posted from one of them. They are just getting so good. And like you said, fast and slick!
But I can't say for sure that this was one until I figure out what you're pointing out. I will tomorrow.

Again, I really appreciate your effort and time. Thanks


Sure you will,,, Do it now. Look at my pic and at 3:40 in the video you brought. Hoax.... claiming ignorance and saying you will check it tomorrow is not the ATS path, is it? Are your procreating hoaxes or what?



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:13 AM
link   
One more point I almost forgot about. Earlier in the thread a seemingly intelligent poster said something to the effect that if this object moved around the Earth that the devastation would follow an adjacent path on the Earth. It made me think that geographic information of the Earth would be relevant as well. For instance, the thickness of the Earth's crust being thinner in some areas and tectonic plates and there edges, not to mention fault lines, that sort of thing.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by Shugo
 


I'm sorry then. But I took it as a huge insult that you don't think I know the fundamental basics of SOHO.
Who doesn't know the Sun is blocked out except an idiot!

I do apologize though.
I was talking about the image right above the (blocked out) Sun.






Are you and Chad playing with my .? Is it that un-obvious? To me it stood out like a major something (glitch).



what the hell is that, i'm looking at it on the stero images right nowww... weird



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr


Sure you will,,, Do it now. Look at my pic and at 3:40 in the video you brought. Hoax.... claiming ignorance and saying you will check it tomorrow is not the ATS path, is it? Are your procreating hoaxes or what?




THIS..........is what I mean. I politely answered you and you try to antagonize me with demands then...name-calling?


My eyes are tired, the page is blurry, the print is small so I was going to wait until tomorrow seeing it's 3:30 in the AM here! But screw you. You're not worth another key...........



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 02:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by ajay59
Hey Human_Alien, What is your take on all this data? Can you give your view of what can possibly be expected on any kind of time frame? If you feel that would be painting a target on your back, it would be perfectly understandable should you choose not to answer. Just curious and it seems as though you may have put some time into researching this?



I just don't know ajay59 mainly because I haven't read data long enough to pick up alerting details. This is completely foreign to me.

Thanks for being concerned about my back. I don't let the few bother me too much. I know most people are just as inquisitive and mystified (and concerned) as I am. I suspect the debunkers are too only they show it in an aggressive offensive manner. I get it. I don't like it. But I understand.

But I tell ya what, I'm not liking what I'm seeing in California right now. Check it out the cluster of quakes!
quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

They are also on a earthquake watch. I didn't even know they had those.
www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com...

Will continue to post whatever I see.
Stay well



new topics

top topics



 
77
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join