It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There are two stories at the top of the news about people who shot other people to death. There are no obvious similarities between the two events. There are nothing but similarities between how the stories are being told to those of us trying to make sense out of the world.
You can see the enveloping ambiguity in both cases begin to soften the edges of the actual events, so as to make them easier to live with. There's a creeping paranoia at the roots of both events. For Bales, it was another trip into a war zone where the lines between friend and foe were utterly blurred, and the search for someone to blame. For Zimmerman, it was the fear of crime that seems to have seeped into that neighborhood like foul water up from the earth, its source the very real economic dislocation abroad in the land, and the search for someone to blame. Someone who "seemed" to the professionally paranoid to be on drugs. Someone who "seemed" to the professionally paranoid to be "looking at" people's houses. Bales and Zimmerman are already halfway to being, if not victims, then people just like the rest of us who simply "snapped" due to circumstances we can all understand, if not excuse. There, but for the grace of god, and all that...
...we are a people too violent with each other, too ready to reach for the gun, and all too prepared to go out hunting for the Other who steals our dreams and our futures and our barbecue grills.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by KillerQueen
The Government is not protecting Bales...they are actively prosecuting him in a court of law. How that turns out remains to be seen.
As for the Florida shooting, Florida law states that a person who feels that they are threatened are entitled to self-defense. And the law is looking into that case as well.
Once again, we'll have to wait to see how it turns out.
There are always two sides to a story.
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
reply to post by TDawgRex
In Bales case he went off base, without orders, and murdered 16 civilians in cold blood. It's not like they are mobile and he just flipped out. His crimes had nothing to do with the military, other then they're the reason he was there. Give him to the Afghans....
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
reply to post by TDawgRex
In Bales case he went off base, without orders, and murdered 16 civilians in cold blood. It's not like they are mobile and he just flipped out. His crimes had nothing to do with the military, other then they're the reason he was there. Give him to the Afghans....
Originally posted by TDawgRex
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
reply to post by TDawgRex
In Bales case he went off base, without orders, and murdered 16 civilians in cold blood. It's not like they are mobile and he just flipped out. His crimes had nothing to do with the military, other then they're the reason he was there. Give him to the Afghans....
Pure emotional and simplistic thinking, which would also set a precedent that would have unknown consequenses.
By your thinking, I could enact my own form of punishment upon OWS protesters who I believe are hurting my business, or willingly hurt police who are trying to enforce the laws upon said protesters.
It's a slippery slope when you discard rational thought in regards to justice.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
reply to post by TDawgRex
In Bales case he went off base, without orders, and murdered 16 civilians in cold blood. It's not like they are mobile and he just flipped out. His crimes had nothing to do with the military, other then they're the reason he was there. Give him to the Afghans....
Regardless of him going off base and acting on his own accord, he still belongs to the military and is still accountable for ALL actions he does while off duty and off base. Ever hear the term GI ?? "government issued" he is government property....
That is why he is in military custody and not let lose to the Afgans.....being turned over to them would cause a security nightmare....since he probably knows classified info and so on....
edit on March 20th 2012 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KillerQueen
www.esquire.com...
...we are a people too violent with each other, too ready to reach for the gun, and all too prepared to go out hunting for the Other who steals our dreams and our futures and our barbecue grills.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by KillerQueen
The Government is not protecting Bales...they are actively prosecuting him in a court of law. How that turns out remains to be seen.
Originally posted by Bullypulpit
The big difference is Zimmerman acted within the law AS IT IS WRITTEN.If you don't like it change the law.Just because tadpole was trespassing on his way home from having cookies and milk doesn't relieve him from his responsibility from what he APPEARED to Z to be.If he had of stayed on the sidewalks he'd be having more chocolate chips right now instead if being wormfood
Resorting to threats of violence as a remedy for frustration is a typical response for the weak of mind and the mentally challenged ...the dispatcher(who has no legal authority to tell anyone what to do) actually said"you don't need to do that"(get out)big difference especially on a legal argument.as for slapping me..well..
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Originally posted by Bullypulpit
The big difference is Zimmerman acted within the law AS IT IS WRITTEN.If you don't like it change the law.Just because tadpole was trespassing on his way home from having cookies and milk doesn't relieve him from his responsibility from what he APPEARED to Z to be.If he had of stayed on the sidewalks he'd be having more chocolate chips right now instead if being wormfood
You deserve to be slapped, hard as hell.......
Zimmerman was told NOT to get out of his truck and follow the teen, but he did anyway. All of this "within the law" went out the door right then...
Not to mention nobody said anything about him trespassing...