So who the heck ever said "Pull it" was slang for controlled demolitions?

reply to post by Demigodly


I asked you to post some "truth" and you refused to do so. Probably because it does not exist and you just made something up in order to provoke a response. But I guess we will never know for sure, since you are not cooperating. That makes your post kind of ironic.

reply to post by Human_Alien


500+ pieces of bad evidence does not sum up to a whole of good evidence. It sums up to a pile of bad evidence.

Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

500+ pieces of bad evidence does not sum up to a whole of good evidence. It sums up to a pile of bad evidence.

That's your opinion.
You're entitled to it.
We also clearly know where you stand.
So perhaps it's time for you to find a better suited thread for you to ambush now.
I think this thread can go on fine without you now

reply to post by Human_Alien


No, thats not really an oppinion. That is how things work in the world. You can't use bad evidence to support your position. In general people don't accept bad evidence, no matter how much you have of it. And there is a very good reason for that. It makes it possible for us to discriminate between nonsense and things that are actually true or real. Accepting bad evidence anyhow is what we call faith.

Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

No, thats not really an oppinion. That is how things work in the world. You can't use bad evidence to support your position. In general people don't accept bad evidence, no matter how much you have of it. And there is a very good reason for that. It makes it possible for us to discriminate between nonsense and things that are actually true or real. Accepting bad evidence anyhow is what we call faith.

You know what the general rule and consensuses for 'bad evidence' is?
When it's not reported on the news and agreed upon by authority.
Who by the way, are the same people!


'nuff said. Isn't it your grazing hour?

reply to post by -PLB-


infowars.net
Bashar.org

reply to post by Human_Alien


I never heard of this "general rule and consensuses for 'bad evidence'" and I completely reject it. I also do not know anyone else who accepts it.

This is what you can classify as a straw man argument.

reply to post by Demigodly


I asked specific evidence of your claims. And you just post some random sites. Well done. We are back at this post.

Originally posted by Demigodly
reply to post by -PLB-

 

infowars.net

Bashar.org

" Bashar is a multi-dimensional extra-terrestrial being who speaks through channel Darryl Anka from what we perceive as the future."




The WOO is strong with this one!

reply to post by Six Sigma


Well, the "reptile" post should have already make all alarms go off. I am glad I didn't check that site out. Wonder what Human_Alien thinks of it. It is probably a nice addition to his 500+ long list of bad evidence.

reply to post by Six Sigma


Troll alert.

You don't need to believe in the alien influence part. Listen to the messages. If it doesn't ring true for you, so be it.

reply to post by -PLB-



Do you have anything to add to the thread ?

What is your opinion on what was meant by -pull it- ? ........... dare i ask

Originally posted by Demigodly
reply to post by Six Sigma

 

Troll alert.

You don't need to believe in the alien influence part. Listen to the messages. If it doesn't ring true for you, so be it.

And the best way to listen to those messages is of course to buy one of his many many DVD's:

bashar.org...

I mean, his message is so important, it can't possibly be free.

Originally posted by Demigodly
reply to post by Six Sigma

 

Troll alert.

You don't need to believe in the alien influence part. Listen to the messages. If it doesn't ring true for you, so be it.

TROLL??? We ask for evidence regarding 9/11 CT's and this guy posts a link to a dude who claims to be possessed by an alien from the future.... Wait... who's the troll?

reply to post by -PLB-


It's all free on youtube.

reply to post by RockLobster


Of course you may ask. I think pull it is slang of plumbers for pulling the plunger in order to release stoppages.

reply to post by Six Sigma


What's CT?

reply to post by Demigodly


Yeh, those DVDs are just there for the poor souls who do not have internet access. It is in no way intended to make money.

Is there a limit to gullibility?

Originally posted by Demigodly
reply to post by Six Sigma

 

What's CT?

Current Transformer








(Conspiracy Theory)

Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by RockLobster

 

Of course you may ask. I think pull it is slang of plumbers for pulling the plunger in order to release stoppages.

So you beleive that there was plumbers in tower 7 ?

You must be on a good wage for you to be on here trolling everyone`s threads with your nonsense.

I beleive that the term "pull it" was used as an order to drop the tower , for- $$$$$$$$$$$ - , if "pull it" was an order to evacuate the building ........... which seems to be the popular lie ....... why would Larry Silverstein be in control of the fire crews ?