advanced pre-Sept 11th 2001 Google search..
The basic idea of explosive demolition is quite simple: If you remove the support structure of a building at a certain point, the section of the
building above that point will fall down on the part of the building below that point. If this upper section is heavy enough, it will collide with the
lower part with sufficient force to cause significant damage. The explosives are just the trigger for the demolition. It's gravity that brings the
alright, so we all have an idea of what an explosive demo is..
A Real Implosion? Strictly speaking, an implosion is an event where something collapses inward, because the external atmospheric pressure is greater
than the internal pressure. For example, if you pumped the air out of a glass tube, it might implode. A building implosion isn't truly an implosion
-- atmospheric pressure doesn't pull or push the structure inward, gravity makes it collapse. But the term implosion is in common use for this sort
of demolition. In this article, we use the word this way.
and that clearly Gravity makes it collapse..
Every time you jump, you experience gravity. It pulls you back down to the ground. Without gravity, you'd float off into the atmosphere -- along with
all of the other matter on Earth.
and Gravity Pulls..
You see gravity at work any time you drop a book, step on a scale or toss a ball up into the air. It's such a constant presence in our lives, we
seldom marvel at the mystery of it -- but even with several well-received theories out there attempting to explain why a book falls to the ground (and
at the same rate as a pebble or a couch, at that), they're still just theories. The mystery of gravity's pull is pretty much intact.
also, gravity's pull is still a mystery, yet a very much real force..
Here we have a professional company describing what is happening in an "implosion"..
Webster’s Dictionary defines implosion as "a violent collapse inward". In the demolition industry, a blaster is usually trying to pull a structure
away from adjacent exposures and towards an area large enough to contain the debris.
and in that explanation explains the technique is to use gravity's PULL to keep other surrounding buildings safe..
When this situation exists, the blaster has no choice; he must make the building collapse in on itself. This is by far the trickiest type of explosive
demolition project, and there are only a handful of blasting companies in the world that possess enough experience—and insurance—to perform these
true building implosions.
and that making the building collapse in on itself it the goal.
It is impossible for a professional demolition crew to advertise their trade without using the term "gravity" to their clients..
how could professionals not use the word gravity to imply the PULLING action that are counting on to do the very task they are being paid to do?
How then, is it so inconceivable, not being a professional, while trying to explain what a controlled demolition is, that someone would refer to this
technique as, wait for it.. to "pull it" down? ie use a slang term?
why would you be looking for a professional example using a slang term to describe their trade? that's idiotic. do you know what slang even is?
yet when Silverstein uses the term, not being a pro, but involved in the real estate market, it is correct slang properly describing the technique
involved for the actions that very much took place. In the quote he tells you this. In reality we watched it happen. In the real world buildings do
not fall as seen without careful planning.
Even if one side was damaged, the building would tip over. Not fall as described by Professionals.
furthermore, if materials in the construction of a building would cause a fire that would melt a steel frame to allow a building to collapse as fast a
gravity's pull, according the known laws of physic's, this would be deemed unsafe to use.
if buildings fell "in on themselves" naturally... why would there even be a profession to do so?
Is their secret out now? Do not hire them with expense contracts and the like.. just have your secretary lite her wastebasket on fire.. after
you've cleared out of course, because according to the new version the whole thing is going to fall.
can you provide a precedent in which a building fell in on itself naturally? you can not. you never will.
you are obviously not looking for any real discussion on this topic and have not looked honestly at the situation.
the Matrix has you. actually, you exhibit signs of being an Agent GoodOlDave. maybe the reason you started this thread was to break free from your