It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
reply to post by GoodOlDave
...and you believe 3 buildings falling into their own footprint is just a coincidence?
Originally posted by ANOK
Large booms or not, it doesn't change the fact that the outer walls could not have landed on top of the rest of the collapsed building from fire and asymmetrical damage. If you don't understand that then you don't understand physics, simple as mate.
When are any of you going to actually address that, instead of trying to find irrelevant points that make no difference to the observed evidence post collapse?
Originally posted by Myendica
reply to post by AGWskeptic
this thread is about who in the cd industry ever used "pull it" as slang for bring down the building. I proved that a prominant person in the industry, uses "pull it" as slang for cd.
Originally posted by EddieCusak
But if it's the idea that the US government would be so psychopathic as to kill its own citizens in a false flag attack, to further a sociopolitical agenda, that you are struggling with, then I would familiarise yourself with Operation Northwoods.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by EddieCusak
But if it's the idea that the US government would be so psychopathic as to kill its own citizens in a false flag attack, to further a sociopolitical agenda, that you are struggling with, then I would familiarise yourself with Operation Northwoods.
en.wikipedia.org...
I don't doubt that the American government is absolutely packed full of the most dreadful sort of people. But operation Northwoods didn't envisage the killing of US citizens. And it never happened.
So it's not really the best example to illustrate your claim.
Originally posted by EddieCusak
reply to post by Varemia
I don't know how it collapsed,dude, I just know how it DIDN'T collapse. by burning office furniture and skyscrapers falling on top of it... If I was to guess how it did collapse, based on what I saw in recorded footage, then I would say it was brought down in a controlled demolition using traditional thermite explosives on the supporting girders of least 75% of its floors...
Originally posted by EddieCusak
reply to post by thedman
Good footage, but if you are offering this as evidence as to what happened to building 7 then we need a bit more information please. Did this building totally collapse at the same rate of freefall? was it built with same integrity as building 7? What I can see is that it was clearly burning much harder and for much longer. As far as I can see there as no smoke coming from building 7 at all. It is impossible to see from this footage whether the whole building came down or only the burning floors. but its good footage and good place to start. But, God, I hope you coincidence theorists are right, it would be such a relief to believe that the 9/11 commission's explanation of the events that day were the whole truth, I just don't believe it yet. convince me.
Originally posted by EddieCusak
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
It envisaged a plan to bring down US airlines. Who was going to be on those planes? Chimpanzees? And it never happened because Kennedy vetoed it, but if it reached his desk, we can only assume that the CIA sat a drafted this plan with every intention of doing it. Times change.. as do presidents.
edit on 22-3-2012 by EddieCusak because: spelling correction
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Unknown Soldier
No steel frame building collapse from fire ....?
What do we have here....?
A building (Delft University School of Architecture) on fire Collapsing from the fire
www.liveleak.com...
Originally posted by Myendica
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
you are jokin right? She doesnt come out and say.. "hey, pull it is industry terms means bring a building down.." no.. Instead she uses "pull it.." to describe how they would bring a building down to minimize damage to surrounding buildings. Case closed. "pull it" is used in the cd industry. Daves theory here is bunk. Its ok.. Doesnt matter what crazy old larry meant.. The question was.. "who the heck ever said "pull it" is industry term for controlled demolition?". I answered that. So anything else is pointless in this thread. Accept that.
Originally posted by EddieCusak
reply to post by Alfie1
thank you. Now I have seen it. there is clearly smoke and fire coming from a building I am being told is building 7, but I will believe that because I imagined there probably was in this and other buildings to be fair... Do I believe this fire could cause the building to collapse at free fall speed into its own foot print 25 minutes after the BBC reported it had collapsed... NO.edit on 22-3-2012 by EddieCusak because: spelling correction