Fred, the late Joe Bageant and the late George Carlin have/had very insightful ways of seeing and telling the often hurtful truth, ways that I really
admire. I hope some ATSers will enjoy this piece.
A Tale of Two Tales
What Real World?
March 5, 2012
As I listen to American fury against uncoöperative Afghans, to Congress furiously denouncing Pakistan for anemic aid in conducting the current wars,
I sometimes wonder whether the US is playing with a full deck. The anger arises I suspect because the US and the rest of the world work from very
different premises. They believe in, as we say, distinct narratives.
The American narrative holds that the United States is a light to the world, the freest, richest, most productive country the world has ever seen, the
greatest military power, the most prolific producer of technology and of Nobel laureates. America is a force for freedom and democracy, a champion of
human rights, a land of universal opportunity with liberty and justice for all. The Unites States is what all countries could be if they accepted our
values. History supports this view. In a raw continent, American energy and free enterprise carved a paradise from a wilderness.
This narrative, the belief that America is special among nations, favored by God, pervades the culture. Those old enough will remember that Superman
fought for “truth, justice, and the American way.”
Underlying all of this is a profoundly moral view of America's place in the world. The United States does not fight, like the French, for glory or
like the English, for empire, or like the Russians, to steal watches from the wounded. America fights against Evil, whether in the form of communism,
terror, Islam, socialism, or the growing threat of enslavement by Chinese communism. These evils are real, Americans believe, immediate, and threaten
us with tyranny.
The narrative of the US military springs from the national narrative. American soldiers are brave, wholesome young men selflessly sacrificing to
overthrow brutal dictators, to defeat terror, and to give the oppressed peoples the benefits of democracy. This actually happened in Japan, Germany,
and Iraq, asserts the narrative. Sure, a bad apple among GIs may occasionally commit an atrocity, but these are isolated incidents and blown out of
proportion by a leftist press.
Quite different is what might be called the World Narrative, held around the globe with differing intensities and emphases. It holds the US to be an
endlessly aggressive military power that is out of control, hypocritically speaking of democracy and freedom while supporting dictators and
overthrowing elected governments. America is arrogant, crassly materialistic, crime-ridden, vulgar, racially unjust, the world's only avowed
practitioner of torture, economically exploitative, imperialistic and intolerant of other cultures.
The military form of the World Narrative holds that America savagely attacks weaker nations in pursuit of oil and empire, that it uses overwhelming
technological superiority to butcher peasants armed with rifles, that atrocities are routine, that it employs Stalinist nocturnal raids to terrorize
populations, that killing of children is common.
The World Narrative is closer to the truth. It is easy to compile a long list of dictatorships supported by the US, and anyone who has covered wars
knows that atrocities are what militaries do. America supports Saudi Arabia and Israel, both with horrible records on human rights. It would also be
easy to show that many countries that accuse the US of misbehavior commit or have committed similar crimes. This doesn't occur to these countries.
Peoples see everybody's warts but their own.
The peculiar isolation in which Americans typically live shelters the national narrative. Americans are geographically isolated in that they can go
nowhere without passports, which few have; linguistically isolated in that almost none speak a second language; and temporally isolated since few have
even a rudimentary grasp of history. Add an odd lack of curiosity, apparently based on a belief that the superiority of America is such that other
places are not worthy of study. The result is a closed system.
This might be of minor interest if it did not affect American policy. But it does. The US operates in a world that doesn't quite exist. Think of a
blind man who by error enters the wrong house. He bumps into furniture and can't find the bathroom because things are not where he thinks they
Consider the war to take over Afghanistan—which is what it is. The American Narrative, relentlessly moral, says that the US is there to fight
Terror, to defeat Al Qaida, to save the Afghan people from repressive domination by the Taliban. The government in Kabul represents the Afghan people
and is allied with the US in ridding the country of extremists. The Caspian hydrocarbons have nothing to do with it. The GIs fight to give Afghans a
stable democracy, law and order, and equal rights of women.
This is the sort of moral mission that the Narrative demands. In the real world, one might as well give art lessons to a boar hog.
By contrast, the Afghans predictably see the US as an invading army of brutal infidels—a word we see as faintly amusing but they don't—who bomb
and kill, kick in their doors at three a.m, humiliate the men in front of their families and insult their women. A very little of this, a very few
dead children, can arouse a whole lot of hatred, but the American Narrative doesn't allow of this truth.
Consequences ensue. Note that in Afghanistan, as in Iraq, as in Pakistan, as in Viet Nam, the national armies supposedly on America's side are never
ready. Despite billions of dollars spent in training them, somehow they are always years away from being able to take over. They desert, coöperate
with the enemy, sometimes murder GIs. By contrast, the enemy fights tenaciously.
The Americans are baffled and outraged. “We are here to help these people, to protect them against the evil (communists, Al Qaida, Iranians, or
whatever). Where is their gratitude? Why don't they do their share?”
When you recruit citizens of a country to kill their own people in the name of a widely hated puppet government, their enthusiasm is likely to be
exiguous. But since the American Narrative insists that the US seeks only to end the dominion of Evil, opposition to America becomes inexplicable.
In war after war, those attacked fail to act as the US expects. The Iraqis should have welcomed the American soldiers who were bringing them democracy
and defeating an evil dictator. This fits the Narrative. That people don't like being invaded, having their cities devastated, their fathers,
husbands, sons, and brothers in the army killed—this does not fit the Narative of unalloyed American virtue. It merely determines events.