It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daaskapital
Accused soldier has 'no memory' of massacre
www.heraldsun.com.au< br />(visit the link for the full news article)
THE US soldier accused of massacring 16 Afghan civilians in a door-to-door rampage, has no memory of the incident, his lawyer said today.
"He has no memory," Mr Browne told CBS News. "He has an early memory of that evening and a later memory of that evening but he doesn't have any in between."
Mr Browne said Sgt Bales, 38, had not admitted to the killings. He also said Sgt Bales was "in shock".
Mr Browne also said his client was not drunk on the night of the massacre but had had a "couple of sips of something".
edit on 19-3-2012 by daaskapital because: eta
Originally posted by Urantia1111
MK Ultra possibly? But to what end? What does Afghani outrage over this extreme event lead to?
Originally posted by Azadok
reply to post by daaskapital
I was thinking about this and have a theory that involves religion , the locust army of revelation has 7000 thousand fallen angels with them and they are described to be able to sting someone . There have been lots of cops snapping and killing people and reporting not remembering or knowing why they did it . What if these inter dimensional fallen angels are stinging people and taking them over then releasing them after the carnage . Just a thought and I am not making an excuse for this guy.
Originally posted by JizzyMcButter
Sounds like a manchurian candidate for sure. When activated they will have no memory of what happened between activation and de-activation.
Maybe the 'sips of something' was the activator for this individual.
Originally posted by daaskapital
This is quite interesting. The soldier who is accused of massacring 16 civilians claims to have no memory of the shooting.
The lawyer representing the accused states that he wasn't drunk, but did "have a few sips of something." Civilians at the time and place of the shooting stated that he was drunk. Reflecting on these statements, it can be inferred that he may of been drunk, regardless of the Lawyer's stance.
However, if one were to verge onto the conspiracy side of things, perhaps the accused was brainwashed, either by the army or an intel agency, and was ordered to carry out the actions, with him having no recollected memory of the matter. If this were the case, why? To boost the pull out of Afgnanistan? What does ATS think?
www.heraldsun.com.au< br /> (visit the link for the full news article)