It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Who is really in charge at the White House

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 10:13 AM
It seems Timothy Geithner is doing as he pleases in reguards to the economy. I wonder who is pulling Obama's strings on the rest of U.S. policy.

A new report prepared by Russian Deputy Finance Minister Tatyana Nesterenko about the Eurogroup meeting of the Informal Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) in Wroclaw Poland on the growing European debt crisis states that EU Finance Ministers were “left stunned”Friday after they were told by US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner that President Obama was “not in charge.”

We all know Obama isn't interested in running the country and now we have Geithner saying exactly that.
edit on 19-3-2012 by rlrsar because: spelling error

posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 10:48 AM
Valerie Jarrett is a main player in Obama's Den of Iniquity.

Along with the very long list of other Obamamites that clutter the landscape.

Despite the Obama administration’s desperate attempts to blame George W. Bush for the Solyndra loan scandal, House Republicans have initiated a series of high-profile investigations into whether the loan guarantee was a political payback. Company VIPs have already said they will invoke the Fifth Amendment when called to testify before Congress tomorrow.

One of the people Republicans must compel to testify about her role in the scandal is Barack Obama’s closest adviser, Valerie Jarrett.

Solyndra CEO Brian Harrison will take the Fifth when he (briefly) testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Friday. Committee chairman Fred Upton of Michigan has asked, “Who exactly are Solyndra’s executives trying to protect and what are they trying to hide?” Investigate Valerie Jarrett Over Deepening Role In Solyndra Scandal

Try to wrap your head around this one (which is actually an old argument) from White House adviser Valerie Jarrett: according to her, unemployment checks — in some round about way — are actually “good for” and “stimulate” the economy: WH Adviser Valerie Jarrett: Unemployment Checks Actually ‘Good For’ & ‘Stimulate’ Economy

Even the White House Itself has Trouble Defending "Them"

posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 10:50 AM
After I read the first line of your post, I thought it sounded extremely familiar...

Sorcha Faal

ETA: In-fact...if you read an article that starts with anything like this: "A new report prepared by Russian" you can almost assume that it's going to be a Sorcha Faal article.
edit on 3/19/2012 by freakjive because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 12:30 PM
reply to post by xuenchen

Unemployment checks are good for the economy? Thats right up there with Maxine Waters and her assinine comment that welfare amounts should be increased to pull people out of poverty.
edit on 19-3-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 12:36 PM
Who is really in charge at the White House?

The dog.

posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 04:32 PM
the OP is new, how should he know, but know now,
he/she does... always check the source OP,

edit on 20-3-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

log in