It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Israel’s intelligence services agree with American intelligence assessments that there is not enough proof to determine whether Iran is building a nuclear bomb, according to a report published Sunday in the New York Times.
The newspaper said that senior American officials believe there is little disagreement between the Mossad and U.S. intelligence agencies over Iran’s nuclear program, despite the fact that Israeli political leaders have been pushing for quick action to block Iran from becoming what they describe as an existential threat.
The report further quoted one former senior American intelligence official who states that the Mossad “does not disagree with the U.S. on the weapons program,” adding that there is “not a lot of dispute between the U.S. and Israeli intelligence communities on the facts.”
WASHINGTON — Even as the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog said in a new report Friday that Iran had accelerated its uranium enrichment program, American intelligence analysts continue to believe that there is no hard evidence that Iran has decided to build a nuclear bomb.
Recent assessments by American spy agencies are broadly consistent with a 2007 intelligence finding that concluded that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons program years earlier, according to current and former American officials. The officials said that assessment was largely reaffirmed in a 2010 National Intelligence Estimate, and that it remains the consensus view of America’s 16 intelligence agencies.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Unless you can share that material, it is moot.
That's kind of why I don't believe you.
Then again, I've seen strange stuff online that disappeared soon afterward.
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
You've read Confidential or Open Source information regarding Iran and a nuclear weapons program? First of all, could you post these papers? Second of all, if the papers are still classified then you don't have access to them, unless they were classified and later deemed Unclassified, otherwise those papers are bogus. I've worked in the military intelligence field when I served in the USN and I'll tell ya, information labeled Confidential isn't all that its crack up to be, even Secret isn't all that great. The higher the classification the more information there is, usually because its so sensitive and TS reports don't usually get downgraded to Confidential.edit on 18-3-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)
I have personally read Confidential or Open Source intelligence material, as you and many others surely have, which state in ABSOLUTE terms that Iran has a program well under way.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
20% IS NOT enough to create a nuclear bomb/nuclear explosion.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
A dirty bomb, is not a nuclear explosion/nuclear bomb. You are being intentionally vague.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
A dirty bomb could be created with 1% enriched uranium. At least attempt to be credible rather than shifty for whatever agenda you hold.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Also there is no 19% wall for research grade.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
You have always said they are trying to make a bomb, you are shifting gears here.
Highly enriched uranium (HEU) has a greater than 20% concentration of 235U or 233U. The fissile uranium in nuclear weapons usually contains 85% or more of 235U known as weapon(s)-grade, though for a crude, inefficient weapon 20% is sufficient (called weapon(s)-usable);[2][3] in theory even lower enrichment is sufficient, but then the critical mass for unmoderated fast neutrons rapidly increases, approaching infinity at 6%235U.[4] For critical experiments, enrichment of uranium to over 97% has been accomplished.[5]
The controversy over Iran's nuclear programs centers in particular on Iran's failure to declare sensitive enrichment and reprocessing activities to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Originally posted by yourmaker
they don't need a nuclear weapon if they under the Chinese/Russian nuclear weapon shield as an observer of the SCO.
their nuclear capabilities are strictly civilian and the American response is strictly political so as to not look weak.
The US has never stated Iran is working on building a bomb.
The US has always acknowledged Irans right to a civilian nuclear program.