Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Human_Alien
Ummmm......it is an obvious Boeing 767, I'm going to further say it is a -300 (as opposed to a -200)
Go ahead, and LOOK here:
www.boeing.com...
Look at the overhead view diagram.....then, compare (and remember to allow for the Google Earth camera distortion).
Even a broken clock is correct twice a day so you're bound to have your moment.
But once...just once I would be floored if I actually read the words "I don't know" from you! Or Phage. Or Chad.
But perhaps when you three don't comment ......it's an unspoken "I don't know"...?
And because you wholeheartedly tell us chemtrails (aerosol spraying) is a figment of our imaginations, how could you say anything OTHER than this is a regular plane?
But you might be right.
I don't have much energy on this thread. I'm saving it for something more controversial (no reflection on you OP. I S&F this anyway)
)
) explained it quite adequately. The image artifact certainly has nothing to do with
chemicals. You can see similar artifacts in other images of planes, even the ones not producing contrails. 
