Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

phantom chem trail or what?

page: 1
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:13 PM
link   
Please go to Lat. 34deg. 23`36.17" N and Long. 109deg.17`49.90" W using google earth. Please someone send in a photo of this anomaly and tell me what you think. I am computer illiterate but would like to discuss this occurrence with someone as the chemtrails are significantly different. Thankyou




posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by chardonnay
 

Here ya go.

ETA I would have cropped it by my mouse buttons aren't working too well. Use the scrollbar at the bottom to move right.
edit on 18/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: ETA



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Let me explain further, There are two planes at the end of these chemtrails. One is a ghost plane emitting a definite blue chem trail. The other is a real plane emitting a brownish chemtrail. Considering the light source the shadow plane should not be ahead of what its shadowing let alone emitting a stronger blue chemtrail. Someone please help me with this.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:30 PM
link   
reply to post by LightSpeedDriver
 


Look at the beginning of these chemtrails please.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:33 PM
link   
reply to post by chardonnay
 


Do you mean that perfectly ordinary contrail, just to the East of "Lyman Lake"?



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:35 PM
link   
reply to post by chardonnay
 


That is one airplane. The "ghost" effect seems to be a result of the satellite's camera, for some reason.

Someone out there might know the details of the sat camera, and why that occurs.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:40 PM
link   
reply to post by ProudBird
 


What bothers me is the shadows. From the camera angle and the shadows the colorful chemtrail and plane should not be ahead of what its shadowing let alone have a stronger chemtrail if its only a shadow.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:44 PM
link   
reply to post by chardonnay
 

I did but I don't really know what I'm seeing other than an interesting anomaly, possibly a processing glitch. I guess it can happen. Computers crash, sensors fail and processing glitches happen on even the best and most expensive technology, such as NASA's SOHO. Squares, triangles and other weird looking things (in SOHO) seem quite a regular occurrence which is usually corrected the next day/cycle. It's still a good find though.


(Disclosure: I am a geo-engineering "believer" but I can't say that this is definitive proof.)
ETA S n F for the trouble of finding it, regardless of the veracity.
edit on 18/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: ETA



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by LightSpeedDriver
 


Thankyoufor the photo or link by the way. It is around Lyman Lake Az.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by chardonnay
 

Thanks on ATS are usually expressed by starring the post in question.
As for the colours, I would imagine the brown is possibly due to the fact that the ground is brown which then permeates the trail or thing being viewed. I am far from a photographic expert. Just thinking along with you.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:52 PM
link   
Well that is pretty cool. Does look like a ghost plane ahead of the other plane. Weird. Never seen that before. The blue cloud seems to go over the brown cloud streak, so who knows.
edit on 18-3-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by chardonnay
 


That is one airplane. The "ghost" effect seems to be a result of the satellite's camera, for some reason.

Someone out there might know the details of the sat camera, and why that occurs.


Here is an reasonable explanation from the Google Earth groups forum...


The dual color is the result of a double exposure.

The satellite that takes many of Google Earth Satellite based (high resolution) images is QuickBird it employs linear array CCDs. One set takes panchromatic images (grey scale) and the second set takes multi spectral images (MSI). The MSI imager is mounted in different physical location on the satellite so its images are acquired later in time.

These images are time re-aligned on the ground on the assumption that there are no moving objects in the field of view. As a consequence any moving object will have a colored image that appears ahead of the moving object and at lower resolutions. These images are double exposures.

If you look on highways closely where you know vehicles are traveling at 60 plus mph you will observe the same red and blue shadows. Hope this helps.


FLying plane near Luxembourg



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by chardonnay
 


It isn't a "shadow" in the sense of a solid object in sunlight casting one.

It is a camera artifact of some sort.....a processing glitch inside the camera itself.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by LightSpeedDriver
 


Woops, I dont know how to star but Ill figure it out. Have you looked at the origin of the chemtrails? They seem to come from nowhere ,but someone explained to me that it was a different time frame. They are flying extremely low and if it is a shadow it shouldnt be sticking around longer than what its shadowing.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 12:59 PM
link   
The colours of the 'ghost plane' make me think it's some kind of refraction to do with the sat cams lens. If it has lenses in series and the sun is at the right angle I imagine that a double image like this could be produced.

Why only on the plane though is anyones guess.

EDIT. I think drunkenparrot hit the nail on the head.
edit on 18/3/2012 by Grifter81 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 01:02 PM
link   
reply to post by chardonnay
 


No, it's a Boeing 767 by the looks of it, and is NOT "flying low":


They are flying extremely low and if it is a shadow it shouldnt be sticking around longer than what its shadowing.


The jet is at a typical cruise altitude....since it's making a contrail. The perspective of the image is the problem, it is an illusion that makes it "appear to be low".

And again, it is not a shadow you are seeing. An internal reflection, from inside the camera.

Might be a focusing problem, since the jet is closer to the camera by several miles than the ground is.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 01:05 PM
link   
The other parts of the image around it are in monochrome while the bit we're looking at is in full colour,the line where they meet shows the exact same detail so at a guess both monochrome and colour images were taken at the same time.Just a guess but maybe it takes simultaneous monochrome and colour images and only the bit we're looking at was usable as colour so has been overlaid on top of the monochrome image.We are seeing both CONTRAIL images taken by two different cameras with a small amount of parallax error that have been blended into a single image,odd though that they meet up perfectly where they enter the colour part of the image.......



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 01:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Drunkenparrot
 


If MSI imager is taken later in time then why is it stronger than the original. And Ive never seen this effect on the other chemtrail to the south. I am thinking the chemical compositions of the chemtrails might have something to do with it.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 01:14 PM
link   
no thats definitely a ghost plane image of the first, do you realise how close they would have to be at the same attitude to appear like that in the photo?

Its going to be some camera lens related shadow reflection, possibly due to multiple pics with overlays for the finished pic, the ground would be in focus but a plane at height not, using a few different cameras on the same satellite and combining the images would produce this.



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Imagewerx
 


Ive been looking at this image for a while and decided to post it because I cant figure it out.It is in an extemely isolated portion of the country barely 20 miles from the New Mexico border.Im not a photographer and some of the explanations have helped but not completely.





new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join