posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 06:50 PM
Originally posted by Deus_Brandon
I am just wondering ... I think that Theory of Pangea or ... basically one mass of land on thie earth .... is flawed.
And that would just be one of the many missed variables to even make it a HYPOTHESIS ....
The whole idea of a HYPOTHESIS is LUDICRIS...
You might want to understand first about rock layers and how we know that Pangaea did exist (and broke apart into Gondwanaland and Laurasia.) There
is also some evidence of a supercontinent BEFORE Pangaea (which was a combination of previous continents.)
However, to do that, you need to look at geology and deep time.