It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by Azadok
I was reading the article in your post and man how funny is the writers conclusion as stated above . The site was dismantled and covered over to protect it from the Christian hoards , talk about being biased against Christians to the point they develope a whole story to explain a dig site based on absolutely no evidence to back his claims wow.
By the looks of things, history bears out the fact that Christian Kings brutally suppressed the old faiths....and vice versa, of course, until the new God had a firm foothold on the land. Don't take it personally, but conversion to Christianity was generally a little more coercive than an invitation to tea, eh?
Originally posted by longjohnbritches
Originally posted by Malcher
Originally posted by longjohnbritches
Originally posted by Malcher
reply to post by longjohnbritches
If there was not this Christian angle would we even be talking about this? I seriously doubt we would be. Could very well be why it is in there in the first place because i am not seeing any evidence.edit on 18-3-2012 by Malcher because: (no reason given)
The evidence you should bring forward is at the end of the article.
There is a blurb about the reporter. In my opinion she is a zionist shill.
She is:
en.wikipedia.org...
She has made a whole career off of writing about Christianity. All she is doing here though is repeating what the original article states. Would have saved us all a lot of time if the OP would have linked to the original article.
I would be more willing to cut him some slack because i really dont bother reading tabloids. Even reading the original article just brings up that four letter word called fact.edit on 18-3-2012 by Malcher because: (no reason given)
What did you think I was putting you on?
Now for the kicker. While all the bashers are hiding in the corner with embaressment. Notice how they got off your back.
Go back and keep posting parts of that link so every one can read it.
These bashers won't read it, so expose them with it by posting it.
It will be cute to see what happens.
the best
Originally posted by Danbones
as the OP I am of the opinion bashing the author for his or her other books is a topic for another thread,a si basjhing the wkipedia authors as well for their historical christian bashing. also you will have to take on all the christians who are bashing each other too....
bash her for this one and maybe the archaeologists who are excavating the site..and maybe try to deal with the references stated in suport of the authors conclusion with a little class
Originally posted by Auricom
reply to post by Danbones
I'm Norwegian and have been following all the biggest newspapers for ten years. Not once have I heard the OP's story mentioned on VG, Nettavisen, Dagbladet +++. Not once.
Originally posted by Malcher
Originally posted by Danbones
as the OP I am of the opinion bashing the author for his or her other books is a topic for another thread,a si basjhing the wkipedia authors as well for their historical christian bashing. also you will have to take on all the christians who are bashing each other too....
bash her for this one and maybe the archaeologists who are excavating the site..and maybe try to deal with the references stated in suport of the authors conclusion with a little class
Um...excuse me but who is bashing?
We cannot be critical?
We cannot ask questions?
No, it seems to me you have some real bias issues and if it was not this it would be something else.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Apparently you do not like this, but you are going to have to get used to this. We are not sheep at the trough.
Originally posted by Danbones
Originally posted by Malcher
Originally posted by Danbones
as the OP I am of the opinion bashing the author for his or her other books is a topic for another thread,a si basjhing the wkipedia authors as well for their historical christian bashing. also you will have to take on all the christians who are bashing each other too....
bash her for this one and maybe the archaeologists who are excavating the site..and maybe try to deal with the references stated in suport of the authors conclusion with a little class
Um...excuse me but who is bashing?
We cannot be critical?
We cannot ask questions?
No, it seems to me you have some real bias issues and if it was not this it would be something else.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Apparently you do not like this, but you are going to have to get used to this. We are not sheep at the trough.
I asked you to back up your opinions in the spirit of ATS and you had your "Knockers in a knot" and refused but you want to wear the shoe on the other foot and then moralize
that is hypocrical no?
Originally posted by Danbones
if you want to bash the authors opinion
fine
state the opinion you disagree with
then prove its wrong
where have you done that?
SHOW ME!
Originally posted by Auricom
reply to post by Danbones
I'm Norwegian and have been following all the biggest newspapers for ten years. Not once have I heard the OP's story mentioned on VG, Nettavisen, Dagbladet +++. Not once.
Originally posted by Malcher
Originally posted by Danbones
if you want to bash the authors opinion
fine
state the opinion you disagree with
then prove its wrong
where have you done that?
SHOW ME!
That is not how things work though.
If i tell you i have a little green elf locked in a box but dont have the key to let him out. Then i demand proof that there is no green elf in the box or else we are to assume that since you cannot prove there is nor green elf then ther is a green elf in the box.
Is this normal to you?