posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 11:37 PM
Originally posted by robhines
It's not just who leads a one-world government, but also our equal vote on every choice that's made apart from emergency response, with the added
clause that if it clearly leads to more people suffering, there's a clause that diffuses all votes and does what's for the best of the all.
Unfortunately, this mentality is highly similar, if not the same as the elitists' i.e. sociopaths. If killing one thousand individuals would save the
human species, would that acceptable? If you say yes, then you need a bullet in the back of your head because the logic is the same to where one
thousand individuals killing the rest of the world population to save the human species. This is why the end never justifies the means. What makes us
human is our humanity. If we sacrifice even the slightest humanity, we've already lost.
The truth of the matter is that the extinction of the human species is imminent, if the path to globalization does not diverge.
Now, we already have a one world government. It just isn't official, which it currently will solidify and cement within the next forty years. Under no
circumstance can this be allowed to happen. The gravity of the problem is that Earth might as well be under quarantine because the result is that we
will destroy our species with transhumanist technology by sociopaths becoming demi-gods and "IT" becoming a major threat to the rest of the universe,
which includes other highly intelligent species.
Fixing the problem is and isn't easy, which we will most likely fail and go extinct. Frankly, we live in the Medieval Ages due to technology being
coveted. It is about time the game is completely changed and hands are forced to be dealt.
A temporary fix would be to jump-start the biggest corporation in the world run by men and women of all creeds, nationalities, and backgrounds. In
doing so, those in control and their pet major corporations would be forced to speed up their moves and would be more prone to slippage. It would
force corporate mergers creating super corporations in order to survive. Likewise, if such a thing were successful, people participating would
actually have a choice and say in what happens in the world by being "employees" of their created entity.
Yes, it would most likely cause a world war and also have a huge potential of being high-jacked. This is why I said it is only temporary fix. However,
it would buy time for a real fix.
edit on 25-3-2012 by voidka because: (no reason given)