We need a one world government, whether you like it or not.

page: 27
67
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:42 PM
link   
I don't recall seeing anyone respond to my two posts outside of being criticized for no paragraph breaks so I'm going to post this:

“I cannot say whether things will get better if we change; what I can say is they must change if they are to get better.”
—Georg C. Lichtenberg




posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 01:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Annee
 





I hate these boring self-indulgent - self-righteous - - ignorant rebuttals.

If you are going to address me - - - try intelligent logic. I would NEVER use the terminology "Fantasy".


I thought I was being charitable!

Psychologists have other words to substitute for fantasies! LOL.

Seriously . . . I don't know what else to charitably call what appears to me to be wildly imaginative constructions on political, social and spiritual reality in such matters.

"Self-indulgent?" I was the one who provided more than 130 quotes of the world's leaders in their own words and publications.

I don't recall you offering an "intelligent," "logical," NON-self-righteous, NON-ignorant rebuttle

[color=66CCFF]TO A SINGLE ONE OF THEM--much less to a dozen or two.

Folks can deny the facts presented in those quotes until Jesus returns (which doesn't appear too far off)

but it won't change those facts.

And it certainly won't change the leader's dragging the whole world down the yellow brick road to hell as they are doing so well.

The fact that there could be such a thread as this shows me how utterly out of touch with 'objective' reality so many folks REALLY are.

Defending the indefensible has reached a new low.

That reminds me of globalist Jacques Cousteau's quotes . . .



129."It's terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day" Jacques-Yves Cousteau, oceanographer and humanist, The UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1991, page 13

139."The distribution of birth control devices and the imposition of mandatory abortion practices in the third world countries is now ecologically insufficient and unfairly out of world social balance. The white, upper and middle class females of modern society are too healthy and fertile to be exempted from some imposed regulation of international law or mandate. An American born child is environmentally too expensive to maintain to his or her adulthood in a world economy. American women must be subjected to some manner of regulation beyond licensing or immediate and mandatory abortion practices. Unconventional and extreme measures must be implemented and enforced by global U.N. mandate as it is deemed necessary. The bodies of these world eco-criminals should be commercially yielded for reintroduction in the world's natural systemic food and nutrient chains, in order to restore a more natural biological balance and order to our Sacred Earth." -- Jacques Cousteau, in his address to the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, 1992.


I suppose you or some of your cohorts will champion even the above assertions.

IF SO, are y'all going to volunteer to be part of the 350,000 to be exterminated tomorrow? How about Friday?

A week from Friday?

Some claim the guillotines are being readied in their warehouses.

Others claim that there are advanced weapons disintegration chambers that turn a room full of Kissinger's "useless eaters" into subatomic particles instantly. Less mess to clean up that way.

.
.
edit on 21/3/2012 by BO XIAN because: get the quote tags right



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 06:32 PM
link   
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT ! We DO need one single government over the whole earth. However, it will not be run by Man, because Mankind makes mistakes. What it WILL be, in case you haven't figured it out, yet, is the Kingdom you pray for every time you begin saying, "Our Father, who art in Heaven..." YES, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THAT IS WHAT THE BIBLE IS ACTUALLY ABOUT - THE INCOMING KINGDOM OF GOD. Oh, and by the way, before you think of considering me as a Doomsday Prophet, I am not. Before you think of considering me as Religious, I am not. What I AM, is someone who was once a devout Atheist. But, the Truth IS out there. I sought it, I found it. I asked for it, I recieved it. I know it, I am free. YOU SHOULD BE, TOO!



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 06:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Fockewulf8
 

What difference would paragraph breaks make? I've seen posts by people online wherein they misspell every other word. Now, THAT'S something to be criticized! Just keep on telling us the truth, Bro, because that's what we're REALLY on here for.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Toolman329
 



WELL PUT.

LONG LIVE THE RETURN OF THE KING.

No suffering servant role this time.

Conquering King is His role this time.

And of His Kingdom of Peace . . . no end.

With evil and evil doers wiped off the planet.

Works for me.

Whosoever will may come . . . on HIS TERMS.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 07:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Toolman329
"Our Father, who art in Heaven..." YES, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THAT IS WHAT THE BIBLE IS ACTUALLY ABOUT - THE INCOMING KINGDOM OF GOD.


You mean the off-planet beings who created humans - - - who are far more evolved then humans?

The Watchers who continue to follow their science project?

Yes - - they are in the "heavens" - - in their ships or on their planets - - - waiting for us to come together as one planet.

Word/sentence interpretation is certainly not limited to one belief in one omnipotent invisible man.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 08:56 PM
link   
Let me suggest that there is a big difference between unity from below and control from above. The latter is what got us in to this mess in the first place. I do not trust the people who got us to the verge of extinction to then "save" me with a world government.

I agree that the nation-state has to go. What should replace it is self-organization from below.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 09:21 PM
link   
reply to post by muse7
 


Religion would have to be banned globally, as well as tribalism in order for such a thing to work, and that will never happen without a huge war. Which is what you want to avoid with a one world government...



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 10:57 PM
link   
My opinion of a one world government was shaped by one or two computer games. I played the Silencer.

cyberionsystems.com...

The role seemed all too natural. I do not like the idea of even greater centralized control and a government that is so big you can not even hope to get any response for any grievances.



posted on Mar, 21 2012 @ 11:58 PM
link   
reply to post by muse7
 


You can have your New World Order. I want no part of it, so I opt out.

I presume I'm allowed to do that in your brave New World of freedom and equality. I MUST be allowed to do that - if you are lording it over me, then we are not equals, and I am not free.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by yourmaker
depends on the way it's run and with what mindset.

if as a mechanism for control, it's doomed to fail from the start.


If it is "run" at all, it is a mechanism for control.



a government lottery of the smartest and brightest in their respective fields, given the type of power the people who currently control it wield, and we'd be well on our way.


Yes. that is exactly what I mean when I say "it is a mechanism for control". You are just trading one set of masters for another.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by nenothtu
reply to post by muse7
 


You can have your New World Order. I want no part of it, so I opt out.

I presume I'm allowed to do that in your brave New World of freedom and equality. I MUST be allowed to do that - if you are lording it over me, then we are not equals, and I am not free.


INDEED.

Well put.

Of course, the Marxist satanic globalists aren't interested in freedom to the least degree for their serfs and slaves.

FREEDOM is only for the elites . . . at everyone else's expense.

If they want to rape you--your problem.

If they want to Bar-B-Q you for dinner--your problem.

If they want to sterilize you for eugenics--your problem.

Obviously, some pigs are more equal than others.








.
.
edit on 22/3/2012 by BO XIAN because: fix photos gifs



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:13 AM
link   
The bottome line is there can be no unified planet based on deception and malicious intent.

Those that encourage a one world government are naive and poorly informed of real history.

Lets start with ufo disclosure, disban taxation without representation and restore honor to politics, go after the charity embezzlers, allow cures for diseases that everyone thinks are uncurable, allow for a mixed economy with strong unions, restore space exploration based on truth, revise history to make sense...just for starters!

Then maybe more people will jump on to this "one world government" bandwagon. The people who are messing up the world today not only are incapable of running a planetary government, BUT more importantly they belong in jail.

How many people have read the secret covenant and the protocols of the learned elders of zion? You can download everything free of charge just by doing a simple internet search!



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by WatcherMan
We don't need a satanic one world govt. We need Jesus...simple.

Albert Pike and his "Pike's Plan" is in full effect right now. God is in control. Simple. Only He can save us. Not a One World Govt. To put your faith in anyone but Jesus is futile. Sorry. satan may be doing his wheeling and dealing right now, but little does he know that he's playing right into God's hand.



Bottom line, in the end, God is in control. We need to turn to Him before the S really hits the F.


Yeah.. people are doing so well letting an imaginary being take care of their problems. Look what happened to America. We do stuff that God tells us to do. Funny how the people we are blowing up also tells them God is on their side. Guess he's really a 2faces #head manipulating people into blowing themselves up for his own enjoyment.

It's actually funny how the earliest forms of government still infect the world like a zombie parasite. It infects you then you try to infect your friends. Braainns!!! Braaains!

Sounds sorta like.. Baaa.. Baaa



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:35 AM
link   
reply to post by oniraug
 


That is because mainstream religions evolved from paganism and demand sacrifices. God does not demand sacrifices....just common sense and goodwill. Satan on the other hand, masquarading as god, DOES!


Religion should not be taken seriously. Spiritualism is a much better alternative and you don't even have to go to church. Just pray to jesus and god!



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by gaurdian2012

look at the big picture how will you end all world conflicts without a one world government overseeing everything.........



We won't.

How will you end all world conflicts WITH a One World Government?

Pass a law?

That's worked great for rape and robbery, now hasn't it?

Human nature is human nature. You're not going to end conflict by passing a law, I don't care if you have a thousand governments, one government, or no government.

The only way to end human conflict is to end humans, and that's a bit extreme and counter-productive.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by g146541
 


You said the words "I" "My" and "Me" at least 6 times

Seriously, stop only thinking about yourself for a bit and for once think about the rest of the world.


Why?

Is the rest of the world incapable of thinking for itself?



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 12:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aliquandro

Communism sucks when it's forced down your throat, but its actually a fair system when it's chosen by the majority willfully (just an example).


That's not fair, either. It holds the minority in thrall against their will, with no recourse.



I'm really sick of the pessimists who are knocking this concept, they will open their minds soon enough, or start scrubbing floors in the new socialist republic of doom.


OR... we might balk, and start destroying everything in sight. I'm a big fan of the scorched Earth area denial tactics of Vercingetorix. You might think you're going to be our overlords, and you might find yourself presiding over a smoking heap of ashes.



We have choices... and once we get rewarded for your skills, intelligence and hard work, you may finally get free of this mental prison.


"Once we get rewarded for your skills, intelligence, and hard work"? I don't think you're going to appreciate my particular skill set, intelligence, and hard work at all. If you think YOU are going to reap MY rewards, you probably ought to rethink that.



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by petrus4

Here's a question. Why do we need to come together?

There are few concepts that I am instinctively more deeply suspicious of, than "unity."



In this context, "unity" is a code word. It is the distillation of an entire paragraph into a single word. That paragraph goes like this:

"You have cool stuff. We don't have cool stuff. We want cool stuff, but we don't want to put in the effort required to get our own cool stuff. Therefore, we will 'unify' with you, and then claim YOUR cool stuff. We will then order you to get more cool stuff, so that we can claim that, too."

Look at East Germany. Destroyed itself in not quite 50 years with communism. Then communism collapsed under it's own weight, leaving East Germany impoverished. They promptly "unified" with west Germany, and sucked all their substance therefrom. They still haven't full recovered.

There's "unity" in a nut shell.



edit on 2012/3/22 by nenothtu because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2012 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by badconduct

Your constitution is 200 years old, and you currently do not live under it.

You don't even know what life under a constitution is like, because human rights trump national constitutions.



No they don't.

Rights trump a Constitution, because they are the basis for it. Such a nebulous concept as human rights however do not. "Human rights" compared to what? Rock rights? Fan belt rights?

Rights are rights. calling them "human rights" is nothing less than an effort to make of them something other than rights, not rights at all.

edit on 2012/3/22 by nenothtu because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
67
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join