It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Limits at Infinity, the number 1 is bigger than you may think

page: 4
7
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 01:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
The Number 1 is the accumulation of All, the Infinite.

If = 1

Each and every One of us is a finite piece of that One, as an individual One of WE the finites.


Ribbit


If God = 1
Then Satan = -1
And ? = 0




posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 03:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by IblisLucifer

If God = 1
Then Satan = -1
And ? = 0


The goddess.



posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 



OKS is right of course. One cannot use mathematics to define the infinite.

And of course one cannot bisect 1 or any other unit in such a way that they

become something else entirely. Thus all rational numbers between 0 and 1,

even if one 'create' infinite amounts of rational numbers, will all be a product

of 1 exclusively.

Naturally, 0 is infinite within, of and by itself, and can therefore never be

defined by mathematics, but must solely be explained in a spiritual sense.

Spiritually, 0 is related to the circle which also only can be defined in this

way.

To attempt initially to define the circle, a new Axiom must be used and which

simply states:

THE INTERSECTION OF TWO CURVES CAN NEVER CREATE A POINT.
ONLY WHEN TWO STRAIGHT LINES INTERSECT CAN A POINT OCCUR.

This again will prove that one cannot bisect the circle to determine the constant

by which the circle can be measured, but must use other ways to do this.

Knowing that the 'circle' is simply a product of vibrations, oscillations and

wavelengths etc., and not the other way around, the circle must be treated in

the same way as these various manifestations.

The true and correct pi is of course not irrational, but based upon a rational

number which is 22/7 or 3.14285714285714....... repeated ad infinitum.

This can now be proven beyond doubt to any free-spirited honest person

not zealously burdened down to any 'belief system' or 'dogma'!

All irrational numbers are man-made, and as such has no lasting benefit

to anyone.

Phi and all square roots are all products of natural numbers, and therefore

also those too, should be deemed rational numbers ......if any true justice

any longer exist in this world!


Cheers




edit on 19-3-2012 by djeminy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by PhysicsAdept
 


I find your post interesting and it makes me think the the possibility of an infinite number of parallel universes is certainly viable.



posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by IblisLucifer
 


0 = human.
/shrug

We are nothing but possibility.
edit on 19-3-2012 by GrimReaper86 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 10:20 AM
link   
I haven't read the entire first few posts, but here is my response from what I've gleaned from it.

An apple may have an infinite number of points along its radius, but that does not make the length of the radius infinite. And so the infinite can be considered to be contained within the finite, but it does not make the finite infinite. Does that make sense or am I just missing the whole point?

I'm probably missing the point, I don't understand 1/∞ the stuff being said on here already. :-P




top topics
 
7
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join