It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jacobe001
reply to post by Sharpenmycleats
You have it backwards Sharp.
Sorry to be blunt.
Is it the CEO and his policies that are responsible for the companies success, or is it the assembler on line 13?
Is it the policies of the US Government and those embedded in it that are responsible for the current condition we
find ourselves in, or because citizen number 13,433,344 bought at Walmart instead of Sears?
In the 1980's, consumers bought higher priced items, than the ones today at Walmart, because that was what was available. Consumers will buy whatever is available and whatever they can afford.
They have no uniting nor controlling power like the elite at the top do.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by TKDRL
And that again reinforces my belief that what we truly need are anti-trust laws enforced, to prevent these huge mega-corporations from existing and to encourage competition, and less regulation otherwise to allow small businesses to start up and keep competition, innovation, and improvement alive and well.
TheRedneck
Originally posted by jacobe001
reply to post by AwakeinNM
If you support the status quo, then you already support wealth redistribution in this country.
Please see my post above on how it works
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by AwakeinNM
It goes back farther bro. For one example, look into the metal industry in the US. We had antitrust laws, but those mamoths subverted them. The rules are only for the little guys, it's been that way for a long time.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
In this constitutional republic, people with ambition and intellect will drive the economy for everyone, and if the government stays out of their way, everyone would benefit. So these people get wealthy - what is the problem with that? As long as they play by the rules set forth, no problem.
Originally posted by User8911
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
In this constitutional republic, people with ambition and intellect will drive the economy for everyone, and if the government stays out of their way, everyone would benefit. So these people get wealthy - what is the problem with that? As long as they play by the rules set forth, no problem.
Ok so you want rules but you don't want the government to get in the way?
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Yeah, uh, that's not at all what I said. Please stop spinning my posts to support your viewpoint. You know damn well what I mean.
Originally posted by User8911
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Yeah, uh, that's not at all what I said. Please stop spinning my posts to support your viewpoint. You know damn well what I mean.
Well no, I don't know what you mean
Explain to me clearly who sets forth the rules if the governement is out of the way.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Knock it off and stop being a troll.
Originally posted by User8911
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Knock it off and stop being a troll.
Winning
You can also just answer the question, if you can't you should go in politics.edit on 17-3-2012 by User8911 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by User8911
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
In this constitutional republic, people with ambition and intellect will drive the economy for everyone, and if the government stays out of their way, everyone would benefit. So these people get wealthy - what is the problem with that? As long as they play by the rules set forth, no problem.
Ok so you want rules but you don't want the government to get in the way?
Yeah, uh, that's not at all what I said. Please stop spinning my posts to support your viewpoint. You know damn well what I mean.