It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mythkiller
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Kiri Lee Campbell $15 Million Court Case settled in ‘Private’”
pbr2013i2e.wordpress.com...
Mythkiller
Also the OPPT (one peoples public trust) are doing some amazing work
So the fact is that no laws passed by Britain are valid in New Zealand or Australia, nor have they been since 1920 and yet we still operate under the Crown British law system,
Although it remains a matter for ongoing constitutional and legal debate, the weight of evidence suggests the Statute of Westminster did more than simply give legal form to New Zealand’s sovereign status. A number of legislative difficulties – both constitutional and in the international fields – were resolved by the Statute.
Before the Statute was passed by the British Parliament – and arguably until the New Zealand Parliament passed the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act in 1947 – the New Zealand Parliament was not a sovereign parliament. It did not have the capacity to make all law, and there were some laws that it could not unmake.
JakiusFogg
However, this includes the Magna Carta from which right of the FMOTL were derived,
cartenz
For anyone incline to go down this path, I recommend a thorough reading of the following judgement; Even tho this is a Canadian case it will still be used as persuasive for any future prosecution of similar "Free-Mans" or "Sovereign Citizen" cases occurring within common law jurisdictions:
www.albertacourts.ab.ca...
Its a long judgement, but it addresses several points of law relating to these types of cases.
Aloysius the Gaul
JakiusFogg
However, this includes the Magna Carta from which right of the FMOTL were derived,
no they were not.
they often quote section 61 of the Magna Carta as justifying "lawfull rebellion", but there's a couple of problems with that interpretation:
1/ clause 61 applied only to 25 Barons!
2/ Clause 61 was only valid for 3 months!! It was then renounced by king John and the Pope allowed him to renounce his oath to obey it. This led to the First Baron's War, during which King John died. His successor was his son Henry III. The Magna Carta was subsequently resigned in 1216 - but Clause 61 was no longer in it (nor was there any equivalent)
Myth's inability to comprehend the difference between "law" and "legal system" is also indicative of the general lack of knowledge of the ACTUAL law (as opposed to what they want it to be) FMOTL exhibit.
Rationalwiki has a sometimes amusing but mostly just sad article on Freeman-ismedit on 14-10-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)