"raise your frequency", Planetary Memeshift Resonance (PMR) theory of conscious evolution

page: 1
9

log in

join

posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 04:54 PM
link   
disclaimer: in the interest of brevity, none of the terms used in this presentation have been defined. it is anticipated that readers and responders already have (or can google) the appropriate context.

 




it is unfortunate that so often in "alternative science", those persons with the really great ideas (re: minds are still open) are without technical proficiency, and those persons with the technical knowledge (the "experts" who think they run this forum) are devoid of proper insight.

certain terms, such as "raising your frequency", present a particular problem in that the "experts" insist such a phrase is unscientific, while the "misinformed" feel quite certain that the scientific explanation is simply not yet known.

in this presentation i aim to put the concept of raising one's frequency into a proper context, both scientifically and ontologically. it is based on extending the established science of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR or MRI) Spectroscopy into the field of human conscious experience. in doing so, it is my hope that further research relevant to our understanding of the nature of consciousness may be persued.

during this OP, i will refrain from interpreting implications of this hypothesis. nevertheless, the reader should note that the contents of all drawings, to include the color-coding and spatial relationships, deliberately imply certain meanings.


thanks for reading!

////////////




posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 04:55 PM
link   
it will first be necessary to gain a general understanding of the technical aspects of NMR spectroscopy.





in NMR, a sample of the molecular species to be identified is placed into a chamber through which a magnetic field flows.

the protons within the nucleus of each atom in the molecule may occupy only one of dual quantized energy states corresponding to
1)a Clockwise (up) spin and
2)a Counter-Clockwise (down) spin

the spin states align themselves with the magnetic field in the chamber. the "up" spin protons have more internal energy than the "down" spin protons. despite the energy difference, the statistical probability of the up and down states are equivalent, or 50/50.





a beam of radiating Electromagnetic energy is fired upon the sample. at a certain frequency, depicted as "X" in the drawing, the down spin protons absorb the radiant energy, causing their polarity to reverse into the higher energy up spin state.

the EM wavelength at which this occurs is a frequency "resonance" of the molecular species.



/////////



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 04:56 PM
link   



it is my claim that we as organisms on the planet Earth exist under very nearly identical conditions as the molecular species in the NMR experiment, as can easily be seen in the following drawing.




if we consider any individual organism to be a "charged particle", we can see that any individual organism within a given species may fall into only one of the many possible spin states that are possible for this species. in this drawing, i have shown the highest energy particle as an upright figure in the "M8" spin state, and the lowest energy particle as an inverted figure in the "M1" spin state.

it is implied that there are a total of 8 spin states for the human species, numbered M1 through M8.

while it is true that the absorption of radiant energy by an organism is more complex, and the magnetic field of the Earth is significantly weaker, than the conditions of the NMR experiment, i propose that the Genetic AND Memetic evolution of all species on Earth is a function of the absorption of the ever-changing spectrum of Electromagnetic frequencies that we are exposed to as modulated by the ever-changing magnetic field of our planet.




if we plot the energetic transitions of the human species along a timeline, we can see the relationship of the resonant frequency ("X") absorbed at a given time (t1-t4).

below, this timeline is expanded to show the relative distributions of high and low spin state particles at each demarkation upon the timeline.



the reader will note that the net transition is a progression of the species through forward time from low energy spin states to high energy spin states.
/////////////



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 04:56 PM
link   
:: TL;DR ::




in summary, the radiant energy absorbed by the human organism from its environment, affected by the changing magnetic flux of the planet Earth, causes a progression of the species through certain quantized energetic states.

these quantized states ("oh dear. he is applying quantum mechanics to humans.") correspond to specific transitions of the genetic and/or memetic development of the individual organism.

each of these transitions may be characterised with certain general traits which are observed of every organism within that particular energetic state. it is not my intention to outline these characteristics herein. however, the reader is encouraged to speculate upon the possible meanings of what is given here as


genetic transition states G1 through G8
memetic transition states M1 through M8


in conclusion, when a person speaks of "raising their frequency", they are likely referring to observing within themselves the traits which are characteristic of a person (particle) who is capable of absorption of radiant energy at a resonance frequency higher than their own current state.

 


a final word about the science:

i know that many people will be tempted to reject this hypothesis based solely upon the assertion that the organism is somehow "absorbing" "radiant energy" from their environment.

it is true that under current scientific understanding, there is no known biological (nor ontological) mechanism for modification of genetic or memetic development via electromagnetic induction.

i would like to propose that it is the "ghost in the machine", and not the machine itself, which is observed to undergo these state transitions. there is much peer reviewed research on the topic of the self-organizing processes of life being the result of the sum effect of a biological chaotic attractor. it is this chaotic attractor which is the target of the electromagnetic transitions which are outlined in this presentation.


further research is available upon request.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   
interesting stuff.

Can not the up spin protons absorb the radiant energy, causing their polarity to reverse into the lower energy down spin state ?

You are plotting energetic transitions of the human species along a timeline. This development is based on the answer of the above question: up spin protons are not turning into down spin, but only vice versa, so things are going towards more energetic states ?

I'd like to know more, but I don't know what to ask



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 06:49 PM
link   
reply to post by inthemistandfog
 


that is a good question.

the up spin protons are already in the higher state, therefore they do not respond to the resonant energy.

when you apply this to the PMR concept, you might say that once a person has accomplished the first transition (from M1 to M2), they will no longer respond to the M1=X1 resonant frequency.....their resonant frequency will now be at M2=X2



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 08:02 PM
link   
reply to post by tgidkp
 


I must be spinning at the wrong frequency to understand this thread.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by boncho
 


what's funny is that I really didn't think it was all that hard to understand. I drew pictures and everything!

but now, looking at the whole thing at once, I can see that this may be intimidating.


thanks for the response, man.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by tgidkp
 


recent experiments have shown that small charge potential differences in zero g have enabled a model to show behaviour very much like a moon orbiting staturn



why is this at all like the op?
we i feel that our planets and some of their moons shows this behaviour quite easy to see,
the planet (example) is saturn and some of the moons are orbiting in unusaual orbits,

the energy from the sun and the expansive forces coming from it are stripping electrons from a cold plasma layer around saturn and the planet has a magnetic field around it,
the different sizes of the planet sturn and the moon IO and the different states of charge creates an attractive force and because of velocity an orbit.

when we can see part of the force involved with the orbital perameters of the moon is Charge potential diferential we can see that both objects have a different potential charge.

the magnetic component of the equation is that the smaller charged body is "inside" the planetary magnetic field of saturn (io) and depending on charge potentials and magneitc effects the moon would orbit at different speeds and in different orbital paths.

i see the spin state and orbital perameters as an anology to the up spin or down spin of the atom

in this way energy intro duced to the planet from the sun would play a direct role in moving the orbit of the moon of saturn either in or out in orbital distence or speed up or slow down orbital period,

or constant perameters or orbit while moving up or down away from the equator but at a mean distence.

if orbits can be effected by the energy coming from the sun,
charged body ie io
humany body and earth

xploder
edit on 17-3-2012 by XPLodER because: fix utube



posted on Mar, 18 2012 @ 11:12 PM
link   
reply to post by XPLodER
 


that was a fascinating video!

I do not think that water droplets nor moons are capable of achieving quantized energy states, and so I am not certain how to make the connection to the information in the OP.

a relationship may certainly exist.....and I am a huge fan of the words "orbit" "attractor" "spin", etc. so I really appreciate your response.



posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 12:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by tgidkp
reply to post by XPLodER
 


that was a fascinating video!

I do not think that water droplets nor moons are capable of achieving quantized energy states, and so I am not certain how to make the connection to the information in the OP.

a relationship may certainly exist.....and I am a huge fan of the words "orbit" "attractor" "spin", etc. so I really appreciate your response.


i see the atomic spin similar to a gyroscopic precession,
the spin up state is when the moon orbits Saturn above the equator,
the spin down state is when the moon orbits saturn below the equator,

in each case the amount of energy imparted from the sun to saturn is more or less but the amount of potential charge difference is unchanged

when the potential charge indiference is higher or lower
the orbital period is larger or smaller,

the saturn /moon anonlogy is to show that like an atoms spin state charge magnetic field and outside energy introduced into the system can have an effect on the electron shell (moon) and force it to move outwards (higher electron state) and also that with outside force or energy (saturn magnetic field) the spin state or orbital characteristics (above or below equator) can be used as an analogy to spin up or down states in a atom

spin up would be conservation of angular momentum at a mean distance,above the equator
nutreal spin state would be mean distance at the equator,
spin down would be conservation of velocity in angular momentum at a mean distance.

the higher magnetic field (extra energy from outside source or sun) would be an anology for electrons jumping to higher electron orbits (larger moon orbital period) while conserving the SAME angular momentum

i was trying to explain the spin up and down states of atoms using orbital mechanics of planets and moons as an analogy

i had no intention of derailing your thread

star for you and please continue without my blathering

xploder



posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 08:09 PM
link   
reply to post by XPLodER
 


i think you have a very good grasp of what is going on here, but i have to point out one thing:

i am speaking about NUCLEAR spin, not ELECTRON spin.

as such, when i use the word "spin" (or in your case "orbit"), it is unclear what, exactly is spinning WRT the proton. in common understanding, the nuclear spin is a formalization, but probably not an actuality.

interestingly, the "resonance frequency" as i have spoken of it above is properly called the "precession frequency". so there is some really interesting language there.



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 12:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by tgidkp
reply to post by XPLodER
 


i think you have a very good grasp of what is going on here, but i have to point out one thing:

i am speaking about NUCLEAR spin, not ELECTRON spin.

as such, when i use the word "spin" (or in your case "orbit"), it is unclear what, exactly is spinning WRT the proton. in common understanding, the nuclear spin is a formalization, but probably not an actuality.

interestingly, the "resonance frequency" as i have spoken of it above is properly called the "precession frequency". so there is some really interesting language there.


i am sorry if my understanding is lacking in depth,
as i am more into astrophysics than quantium physics,

that said the parables between quantum atomic spin (proton) and electron orbit (moon) would under constant conditions have a proportional relationship, the factors relating to the obital period would be,
indeiference of charge potentials (+/-) of the bodies (proton/electron)
orbital period, (magnetic field streangth) outside source (sun) / potential charge indeference,/magnetic field influence.
orbital plain, relationship between orbital period (as described above) with conservation of angular momentium,

for a fixed mean orbit period more angular momentium (potential not acual) can be stored when the electron (moon) is above the eqatorial plain,
for the same mean orbit,

when the electron (moon) is below the eqatorial plain more velocity interaction between the planet (saturn) (proton) is (potentially generated) and imparted to the moon (electron)

the direction of vetor of the sun is the deriving factor of UP or DOWN spin
ie the direction the sun travels dictated what is UP OR DOWN when dealing with spin,

now bear in mind that the electron (moon) has an effect on the planet (saturn) and causes a presesion,
the MORE the moons the MORE the precition, or the larger the charge potential indiference the higher the velocity and the larger the center of mass changes (planet saturn proton) in relation to a fixed center.

the more outside influence on the peramerters (sun) (proton) the larger the precesion,
but also the greater need for consrvation at a mean distence

i am really bad at explaining this,
please forgive my effort in explaining quantum observations using astrophysical ideas

xploder





top topics
 
9

log in

join