It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(CNSNews.com) - A conservative civil rights group has filed a first-of-its-kind federal lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services on behalf of a Missouri business owner who says the HHS contraceptive mandate violates his constitutionally-protected religious beliefs.
The lawsuit, filed by the American Center for Law and Justice, requests a permanent injunction prohibiting the HHS from requiring those who have religious objections to abide by the mandate, which requires employers to purchase health insurance for their employees that includes coverage for contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs.
The lawsuit marks the first legal challenge to the HHS mandate from a private business owner and his company. Until now, only religious organizations or institutions have brought lawsuits challenging the mandate.
Frank R. O'Brien, a Catholic, is the chairman of St.-Louis-based O'Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC, which operates a number of businesses that explore, mine, and process refractory and ceramic raw materials.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
I don't get this at all. People who believe in an imaginary friend can dictate health issues of people they hire? Does their religion somehow say "you shall thrust upon everyone else whatever you believe"?
5. O’Brien contends that by requiring him to choose between conducting his business in
a manner consistent with his religion, or paying ruinous fines and penalties, the Mandate violates
his rights under the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and violates the
Administrative Procedure Act.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by PsykoOps
I don't get this at all. People who believe in an imaginary friend can dictate health issues of people they hire? Does their religion somehow say "you shall thrust upon everyone else whatever you believe"?
From the lawsuit:
5. O’Brien contends that by requiring him to choose between conducting his business in
a manner consistent with his religion, or paying ruinous fines and penalties, the Mandate violates
his rights under the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and violates the
Administrative Procedure Act.
This is a U.S. Constitution issue.
The "dictation" is coming from the U.S. Government.
Originally posted by David9176
So the man is suing because he is being forced to do something against his beliefs...yet in the process wants to shape the insurance he provides based on his own beliefs and force it on employees?
This entire battle isn't about religion.
It's employer rights vs. employee rights.
IMO...this entire argument only proves that we need a public option.
edit on 16-3-2012 by David9176 because: (no reason given)
This is a U.S. Constitution issue.
The "dictation" is coming from the U.S. Government.
Originally posted by LuckyLucian
reply to post by xuenchen
Hey, I'm not all for the healthcare bill, I'm just saying that this particular issue is total nonsense. You can't infringe on another persons rights just because you sign their check. That's all I'm saying. If said employer believes contraceptives are wrong, then don't use them. However, there are others that do use them. Even some that need them and this yahoo wants to deny them. It's just wrong.