Originally posted by stereologist
www.abovetopsecret.com...]post by truthseekr1111
actually, NO i'm not claiming the SIZE itself is validation itself alone in this case, since only the Mexico quake's size can better fit the
pattern,,,at least for NOW, until the window concludes. I'm simply pointing out that we're still within the cycle's pattern and that these could be
part of the cycle's foreshocks if not just because these quakes also hit directly on a key ley line of or part of the cycle.
So this is grasping at straws as well as cherry picking.
That's 0 for 1, again.
SO WHAT??? besides, you give no context or logic for why it invalidates anything.
It's quite obvious that an obvious baloney story such as this needs to pretend some validity by overlapping large parts of known active areas.
evasion of the evidence, issue and challenge again noted.
since if it was obvious baloney, the overwhelmingly majority let alone more than just you and 1 or two posters here, would support what you're
asserting not to mention would have already presented an intelligent counter-argument showing exactly how and where whats been validated, is false.
Originally posted by stereologist
That makes 0 for 2. I think that needs to be upgraded to 0 for 3 since this is an ongoing issue.
then I guess that makes you 0 for 4
right... they're invisible and simply represent a pattern thats going on which the human "eye" cannot PHYSICALLY detect. Or in other words, as the
presentation postulates... the map is a visual interpretation, translation of DATA within what might be described as computer language or binary
"images" so to speak.
That makes no sense at all. The ley lines are not lines. The broad, wide sweep across the globe is meant to cover areas known by science in order to
trick the gullible.
Even if what I've already explained (to which you've given no logical response refuting) wasn't valid, the fact that the 188 day pattern consistently
correlates to dates where rare and unusual 7, 8 and 9 mag quakes occur as far back as 200 years, alone refutes your claim and supports what the video
The images on the screen you're looking at, and letters you're typing, are in essence 1's & 0's.
no, its your opinion its irrelevant.
can you SEE MAGNETISM and its processes or mechanics? just because you can't visually, doesn't mean nothings there or not occurring.
More irrelevant commentary.
Now 0 for 5.
the fact you have no logical response at all, doesn't prove what I've said is irrelevant.
which means you're 0 for 6
nothing you've provided supports your wild eyed CLAIMS about the video or what i've said about the video
It's painfully obvious that it does.
Now 0 for 6.
the fact that you seem to be the only one with that OPINION and argument, suggests otherwise.
making you 0 for 7
claiming the video is simply about "curves covering much of the worlds active EQ zones" or that its cherry picking data when you haven't shown
whats being cherry picked, makes for a silly argument against the video, however lacking it is in substance and context.
yeah, and the fact everyone knows australia and the where the quake hit is such an ACTIVE fault zone!
the fact that EVERY major quake on the 188 cycle has hit on these "imaginary" ley lines is such an OBVIOUS coincidence! Nothing interesting to see
I bow to your insightful wisdom, deductive reasoning and immense knowledge O wise one! lol
I did not state that the video was cherry picking. I stated that you were cherry picking and you did.
I stated that the ley lines are not lines. They broad sweep of the lines is cover up for the fact that the features are not linear.
What exactly am I cherry picking then?
your argument is broad sweep with no specifics or examples
which puts the final tally 0 for 8
and theres the magic number 8 again
edit on 27-3-2012 by truthseekr1111 because: (no reason given)