Up to 20 US troops behind Kandahar bloodbath - Afghan probe, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 37 times
Topic started on 16-3-2012 @ 07:39 AM by purplemer

An Afghan parliamentary investigation team has implicated up to 20 US troops in the massacre of 16 civilians in Kandahar early on Sunday morning. It contradicts NATO's account that insists one rogue soldier was behind the slaughter.


2ndrevolt.com...

This story is coming out a little different to the current offical story and if it is true I cannot see the Afgan government putting up with this kind of stuff much longer.



“We are convinced that one soldier cannot kill so many people in two villages within one hour at the same time, and the 16 civilians, most of them children and women, have been killed by the two groups,” investigator Hamizai Lali told Afghan News.


Whatever happened here is sad. The cold blooded death of women and children by trained professional soldiers should not happen. Iit was stated that if that International community did not act of the information that the US collation would be declared as an occupying force..


"If the international community does not play its role in punishing the perpetrators, the Wolesi Jirga [parliament] would declare foreign troops as occupying forces,”



reply posted on 16-3-2012 @ 07:58 AM by sitchin
reply to post by MainLineThis



I certainly think one guy could have done it. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Sad that it happened. We should just get out of that country and let them go back to being toothless mud but living religious morons.


a very arrogant ,narrow minded ,uneducated comment and an insult to the afghan people ,who we are supposed to be liberating .....not terrorizing and insulting their culture


reply posted on 16-3-2012 @ 10:29 AM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Plugin



That is what we are trying to do...install walmarts and Mcdonalds and Apple stores...

-Sent from my iPhone
edit on 103131p://3America/ChicagoFri, 16 Mar 2012 10:29:45 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-3-2012 @ 11:00 AM by nake13
Originally posted by purplemer


An Afghan parliamentary investigation team has implicated up to 20 US troops in the massacre of 16 civilians in Kandahar early on Sunday morning. It contradicts NATO's account that insists one rogue soldier was behind the slaughter.


2ndrevolt.com...

This story is coming out a little different to the current offical story and if it is true I cannot see the Afgan government putting up with this kind of stuff much longer.

Whilst it is always terrible when innocent non-combatants are slaughtered in this manner,if the boot were on the other foot,that's exactly what the islamic extremists would have done,they don't differentiate between "legitimate" and non legit military targets,therfore to take a cold dispassioned view,perhaps we should adopt their tactics? it's the only way we can ever hope to come close to defeating them.

Letsa fac e it there would be celebrations throughout the Islamic world if say London were the focus of a suitcase nuke attack,perhaps we ought to pre emptively hit say Mecca to show our intent?



“We are convinced that one soldier cannot kill so many people in two villages within one hour at the same time, and the 16 civilians, most of them children and women, have been killed by the two groups,” investigator Hamizai Lali told Afghan News.


Whatever happened here is sad. The cold blooded death of women and children by trained professional soldiers should not happen. Iit was stated that if that International community did not act of the information that the US collation would be declared as an occupying force..


"If the international community does not play its role in punishing the perpetrators, the Wolesi Jirga [parliament] would declare foreign troops as occupying forces,”






reply posted on 16-3-2012 @ 11:20 AM by purplemer
Originally posted by MainLineThis
Reply to
post by purplemer


I certainly think one guy could have done it. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Sad that it happened. We should just get out of that country and let them go back to being toothless mud but living religious morons.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com



I think you should have a little more empathy under the circumstance. These are not fish in a barrel. They are people most of which were woman and children. Are these fish in a barrel..?


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^