What's ATS turning into?!

page: 6
50
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 02:38 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 


Look I found many more triangles on the sun!



Even a couple off of it
edit on 3-16-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 02:45 PM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 


That is the length of your argument? Oh well, now lets remove all the red ones, and make the background blue. Which one seem to remain?

edit on 16-3-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 


There is no freaking triangle there!

Are you high!?

Your brain is making things up and you're seeing what you want to see!
You are a completely illogical person.

Lets end this discussion before it gets even sillier.
edit on 3-16-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by paradox
reply to post by NeoVain
 


There is no freaking triangle there!

Are you high!?

Your brain is making things up and you're seeing what you want to see!
You are a completely illogical person.

Lets end this discussion before it gets even sillier.
edit on 3-16-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)


Oh i get it. you are color-blind right? Don´t feel bad about it, many people seem to be. Let me help you: convert it to greyscale. The pattern will appear clearly even in greyscale.

Why do you want to end the discussion when we are making progress at last? You don´t want to admit you are color-blind this late in the race, thus confirming why you didn´t see the triangle?
edit on 16-3-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 02:57 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 


So I am color blind because I don't see an imaginary triangle in a blue image? or a green image? or any color image?

There is no triangle.

You can live your life thinking that aliens will attack through a star portal any day now. I think you might die disappointed, though. (you might even weird out some people...but it's okay because thinking that is totally fine, right?)

I choose to be sane, logical, and deny ignorance.
Later dude!
edit on 3-16-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by paradox

I do not care about flags and stars on my posts, because I know this site is full of lunatics who spend so much time over their heads in conspiracy theories that the lines between reality and fiction become nonexistent, so by all means, do not star or flag. I think stars and flags are kind of a juvenile concept anyway.


Much, much, much better than paragraphs of "Thank you" acknowledgments below posts ala Project Avalon and Camelot forums.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 


So in the 2 minutes it took for you to reply to my previous thread, you converted the pic to grescale, inspected it, then hit reply here and typed all that and pressed post?


I think you skipped the greyscale convesion.


You choose ignorance, that is all.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 03:03 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 


Nope, I didn't bother because there is no triangle in any color. Doesn't matter if it's blue, white, pink, green, red, greyscale, (insert color here)

That is reality, my friend.
Now please stop derailing my thread and take this nonsense to your own!

Thanks



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by SonicInfinity
 


Sounds like the thread was Synergized, see here:

lyne4lyne.tripod.com...

The story of an organization, not a thread but the treatment is vaguely familiar, that
falls apart according to the views of one person that a seemingly harmless infiltration
brings into chaos and downfall by whom he calls Synergists.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 




You'll find lots of cult fodder on this site, the fact that your thread has many stars and flags does not give it validity, it only confirms that the same people who starred and flagged your thread are easliy taken in and will believe almost everything they read as long as it isn't 'mainstream'

In all honesty I have trouble believing that even you who created that thread actually believes there will be an alien attach based on dodgy, anomalous, triangular shapes in the Sun and the Sun spitting out plasma or whatever it was. That's one serious stretch of the imagination. No hard feelings though, we can agree to disagree without falling out.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by ALostAlien
 


It really is.

Creating fantasies without supporting evidence does not change reality. You create stories because you are not satisfied with your mundane life. I never said I don't believe some conspiracies where the evidence points that way. For example, I think 9/11 was an inside job because none of the evidence points to the original story. That does not, however, mean everything is a conspiracy. If you did not join ATS for truth, and intelligent discussion with supporting facts, then you are in the wrong place. Deny Ignorance has been the motto here for a reason. I do not claim to know everything, but there is nothing arrogant, nor idiotic about asking people to back up their claims. That is a logical fallacy! And a very pathetic one at that!

Sorry buddy, I didn't mean to offend your flawed thinking process. Enjoy fairy land!

Oh, and just a word of advice, new guy, ATS has terms and conditions you have to abide by.
Posts like that will get you on the fast track to a ban.
edit on 3-16-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 04:28 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 


Perhaps "followers" is the right word for you to use...followers as in Jim Jones....Charles Manson....David Koresh...and now NeoVain...is this what you want a bunch of blind followers that hang on every word you and YouTube Videos provide....stars and flags are the contributions which build your confidence to provide more dribble ?

I am all for speculation...questions...even conjecture but not FICTION...no need to provide false infromation and out right lies to have intelligent conversations about the area of intrest we all share...but drawing conclusions from videos and inventing stargates as they exist on the sun...I mean common sense must tell you that it is not likely...just read the facs about the sun as we do know them...



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 09:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by paradox
reply to post by NeoVain
 


Nope, I didn't bother because there is no triangle in any color. Doesn't matter if it's blue, white, pink, green, red, greyscale, (insert color here)

That is reality, my friend.
Now please stop derailing my thread and take this nonsense to your own!

Thanks





posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 09:44 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 


Thank you for helping to prove there is no triangle once again

If you will join me in reality for a second, here is your "triangle" in its entirety.
Not the delusion you are trying to convince people is truth. There are others on ATS smarter than that.



Do you see now how the human brain tries to find shapes and patterns in everything in order to make sense of it? Look at the facts, not mind tricks.

Also, the sun is not a 2 dimensional object like in pictures...
edit on 3-16-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:17 AM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 


I, too, used to look forward to seeing the new posts.

Now its all crap.

One place even had a dumb song embedded, upon opening!

Let's get back to far less nonsense!



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:38 AM
link   
I think you are being very silly.
You give as an example how the moon hoax theories have all been debunked.
The first and most obvious question is how could they have been debunked if they were never mentioned?
If makes no sense trying to debunk a claim that no one has made and so "if" they have been debunked then some of the credit must go to those who posted the moon hoax threads to begin with as without them there would have been no debunking. No? Obvious? Yes?
Then there is the question of who determines if the evidence debunking the claim is definitive enough. What you might find believable may seem less so to others. That these threads continue demonstrates that there are others who do not share your belief in the debunker's arguments. Should their opinions be ignored because you have decided to accept the counter-argument? Your opinion carries more weight because......because.....give me a hand here I'm having a bit of trouble finishing this line....because...?????
I concede it is only a guess but I would guess that every single item discussed on a thread here will have at least one person who believes that subject has been resolved and therefore the thread is a waste of time and should not be allowed. Should we ignore their opinions but not yours?
Yes? No? Who should we allow to determine this? And whoever you choose, why them?
Since no one is obligated to read/follow/comment or in any way even acknowledge the existence of any particular thread what harm is done if some people choose to discuss an issue "you" have deemed "resolved"?
I, personally, have never encountered any scientific proof that God exists, Still..
I, personally, have never encountered any scientific proof that God does not exist.
The same holds true for Big Foot, ghosts, UFOs, aliens sea serpents or gnomes.
Am I wrong then to assume that for me to claim to 'know' which of these are part of our reality would be the height of arrogance? To confuse one's opinion with fact, does this qualify as arrogance, or perhaps ignorance?
One thing I will admit you have right.
It is nice to let out a rant every so often.
Did I mention I have very little patience with those who pretend to intelligence yet are unable to grasp a concept as simple as objectivity?
Oooh. I like that. I have to rant more often.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:43 AM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 

Those who do not learn from history..........etc. etc.
He does not need to convert to greyscale. He knows the triangle isn't there.
Wait a minute...I've heard that argument before. Where was it?
Oh I remember
We do not need to look through your telescope Galileo
We know there is nothing to see.

It seems such wisdom is ageless



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Puck 22
 


Low and behold, there was no triangle



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 10:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Puck 22

Did I mention I have very little patience with those who pretend to intelligence yet are unable to grasp a concept as simple as objectivity?
Oooh. I like that. I have to rant more often.


Facts are objective


You obviously are having a hard time understanding the rant. What is so outlandish about asking people to back up their claims with evidence before stating something is fact?

Are you not here to learn, or are you just here to giggle at fantasies?

I am simply saying, do not state things as fact unless there is undeniable proof.
If you want to talk about big foot, that's fine. Make the thread title "Could this be bigfoot?" and let's have a discussion. Not "BIGFOOT FOUND UNDENIABLE PROOF" with a blurry youtube video.

If you want to talk about aliens/UFOs, FINE, same thing.
Do you see where I'm going with this, or is that not a simple enough concept for you to grasp?

edit on 3-17-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)





top topics
 
50
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join